The Unconstitutionality of article 10, I and § 5 of the Family Planning Law

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendes, Tess Carvalho
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Lando, Giorge Andre
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5937
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to study Law n°. 9,263/96, which regulates the constitutional right to family planning, focusing on the provisions that establish requirements for voluntary sterilization, foreseen in art. 10, I and §5th. Based on the assumption that the current rules governing voluntary sterilization in Brazil are unjustifiably restrictive, the objective is to confront the law under examination with constitutional norms-principles. The present work was based on qualitative research and literature review, and with the application of deductive method, the results of the work showed that there is incompatibility between the infraconstitutional provisions examined and the Constitution, having the fragments under analysis unconstitutional.
id UNIFEI_d336d77960fbcfcb6ec3720bf9eb8da7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5937
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling The Unconstitutionality of article 10, I and § 5 of the Family Planning LawLa inconstitucionalidad del Artículo 10, I y § 5, de la Ley de Planificación FamiliarA Inconstitucionalidade do artigo 10, I e § 5°, da Lei do Planejamento FamiliarInconstitucionalidadPlanificación familiarEsterilización voluntariaDerechos fundamentales.InconstitucionalidadePlanejamento familiarEsterilização voluntáriaDireitos fundamentais.UnconstitutionalityFamily planningVoluntary sterilisationFundamental rights.The purpose of this article is to study Law n°. 9,263/96, which regulates the constitutional right to family planning, focusing on the provisions that establish requirements for voluntary sterilization, foreseen in art. 10, I and §5th. Based on the assumption that the current rules governing voluntary sterilization in Brazil are unjustifiably restrictive, the objective is to confront the law under examination with constitutional norms-principles. The present work was based on qualitative research and literature review, and with the application of deductive method, the results of the work showed that there is incompatibility between the infraconstitutional provisions examined and the Constitution, having the fragments under analysis unconstitutional.El presente artículo tiene como objeto de estudio la Ley nº 9.263 / 96, que regula el derecho constitucional a la planificación familiar, centrándose en los dispositivos que establecen los requisitos para la realización de la esterilización voluntaria, que son su art. 10, I y §5º. Basado en el supuesto de que las normas actuales que rigen el acto de esterilización voluntaria en Brasil son injustificadamente restrictivas, el objetivo era confrontar la ley bajo examen con las normas y principios constitucionales. El presente estudio se basó en la investigación cualitativa y la revisión de la literatura, y con la aplicación de un método deductivo, los resultados del estudio demostraron que existe incompatibilidad entre las disposiciones infraconstitucionales examinadas y la Constitución, cubriendo los fragmentos bajo análisis con inconstitucionalidad.O presente artigo tem como objeto de estudo a Lei nº 9.263/96, que regula o direito constitucional ao planejamento familiar, posicionando seu enfoque nos dispositivos que estabelecem requisitos para a realização da esterilização voluntária, quais sejam o seu art. 10, I e §5º. Partindo-se da suposição de que as atuais regras que disciplinam o ato de esterilização voluntária no Brasil são injustificadamente restritivas, objetivou-se confrontar a lei em exame com normas-princípios constitucionais. O presente trabalho baseou-se em pesquisa qualitativa e revisão de literatura, e com a aplicação de método dedutivo, os resultados do trabalho demonstraram que há incompatibilidade entre as disposições infraconstitucionais examinadas e a Constituição, revestindo de inconstitucionalidade os fragmentos em análise.Research, Society and Development2020-07-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/593710.33448/rsd-v9i8.5937Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e493985937Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e493985937Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e4939859372525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5937/5078Copyright (c) 2020 Giorge Andre Lando, Tess Carvalho Mendesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMendes, Tess CarvalhoLando, Giorge Andre2020-08-20T18:00:17Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5937Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:29:16.683782Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Unconstitutionality of article 10, I and § 5 of the Family Planning Law
La inconstitucionalidad del Artículo 10, I y § 5, de la Ley de Planificación Familiar
A Inconstitucionalidade do artigo 10, I e § 5°, da Lei do Planejamento Familiar
title The Unconstitutionality of article 10, I and § 5 of the Family Planning Law
spellingShingle The Unconstitutionality of article 10, I and § 5 of the Family Planning Law
Mendes, Tess Carvalho
Inconstitucionalidad
Planificación familiar
Esterilización voluntaria
Derechos fundamentales.
Inconstitucionalidade
Planejamento familiar
Esterilização voluntária
Direitos fundamentais.
Unconstitutionality
Family planning
Voluntary sterilisation
Fundamental rights.
title_short The Unconstitutionality of article 10, I and § 5 of the Family Planning Law
title_full The Unconstitutionality of article 10, I and § 5 of the Family Planning Law
title_fullStr The Unconstitutionality of article 10, I and § 5 of the Family Planning Law
title_full_unstemmed The Unconstitutionality of article 10, I and § 5 of the Family Planning Law
title_sort The Unconstitutionality of article 10, I and § 5 of the Family Planning Law
author Mendes, Tess Carvalho
author_facet Mendes, Tess Carvalho
Lando, Giorge Andre
author_role author
author2 Lando, Giorge Andre
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendes, Tess Carvalho
Lando, Giorge Andre
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Inconstitucionalidad
Planificación familiar
Esterilización voluntaria
Derechos fundamentales.
Inconstitucionalidade
Planejamento familiar
Esterilização voluntária
Direitos fundamentais.
Unconstitutionality
Family planning
Voluntary sterilisation
Fundamental rights.
topic Inconstitucionalidad
Planificación familiar
Esterilización voluntaria
Derechos fundamentales.
Inconstitucionalidade
Planejamento familiar
Esterilização voluntária
Direitos fundamentais.
Unconstitutionality
Family planning
Voluntary sterilisation
Fundamental rights.
description The purpose of this article is to study Law n°. 9,263/96, which regulates the constitutional right to family planning, focusing on the provisions that establish requirements for voluntary sterilization, foreseen in art. 10, I and §5th. Based on the assumption that the current rules governing voluntary sterilization in Brazil are unjustifiably restrictive, the objective is to confront the law under examination with constitutional norms-principles. The present work was based on qualitative research and literature review, and with the application of deductive method, the results of the work showed that there is incompatibility between the infraconstitutional provisions examined and the Constitution, having the fragments under analysis unconstitutional.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5937
10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5937
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5937
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5937
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/5937/5078
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Giorge Andre Lando, Tess Carvalho Mendes
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Giorge Andre Lando, Tess Carvalho Mendes
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 8; e493985937
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 8; e493985937
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 8; e493985937
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052737812168704

Registros relacionados