Gastrointestinal nematode infection in Purunã heifers raised in conventional and integrated livestock forest systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: BAIAK,Barbara Haline Buss
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: GASPARINA,Jennifer Mayara, MOLETTA,José Luis, ROCHA,Raquel Abdallah da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402020000100701
Resumo: ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to evaluate the resistance of Purunã heifers to nematode infection in two different production systems. In this study, 29 heifers were divided into eight pickets, four in an integrated livestock forest system (ILF) and four in a conventional pasture system (CPS). Feces were collected monthly to perform the fecal egg count (FEC), evaluate the degree of infection caused by gastrointestinal nematodes in cattle, and carry out coproculture, to identify the genus of the parasites. In addition, animal body weight was determined to evaluate performance. On the same day as the measurements, forage samples were collected to determine the number of infective larvae per kilogram of dry matter (L3/kg DM) in each picket. There were no statistical differences in FECs between the treatments. Although no significant differences were observed in the recovery of L3/kg DM, the contamination was higher in the ILF compared to CPS in December (344 and 37.7 L3/kg DM, respectively) and January (312 and 0 L3/kg DM, respectively). In March, the CPS (321 L3/kg DM) presented higher contamination than the ILF (80.7 L3/kg DM), but with no statistical difference. The weight of the animals was higher for the CPS compared to the ILF treatment throughout the whole experimental period, with a significant difference in December (343.30 kg and 314.08 kg, respectively). The present study demonstrated numerically that greater numbers of L3 were recovered from pasture of the ILF, which could have resulted in higher contamination and lower performance of the animals.
id UFBA-3_0f4fe6ed6def30055c5a019434b2b6af
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1519-99402020000100701
network_acronym_str UFBA-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
repository_id_str
spelling Gastrointestinal nematode infection in Purunã heifers raised in conventional and integrated livestock forest systemsagroforestry systemscattlehelminthsABSTRACT The objective of the study was to evaluate the resistance of Purunã heifers to nematode infection in two different production systems. In this study, 29 heifers were divided into eight pickets, four in an integrated livestock forest system (ILF) and four in a conventional pasture system (CPS). Feces were collected monthly to perform the fecal egg count (FEC), evaluate the degree of infection caused by gastrointestinal nematodes in cattle, and carry out coproculture, to identify the genus of the parasites. In addition, animal body weight was determined to evaluate performance. On the same day as the measurements, forage samples were collected to determine the number of infective larvae per kilogram of dry matter (L3/kg DM) in each picket. There were no statistical differences in FECs between the treatments. Although no significant differences were observed in the recovery of L3/kg DM, the contamination was higher in the ILF compared to CPS in December (344 and 37.7 L3/kg DM, respectively) and January (312 and 0 L3/kg DM, respectively). In March, the CPS (321 L3/kg DM) presented higher contamination than the ILF (80.7 L3/kg DM), but with no statistical difference. The weight of the animals was higher for the CPS compared to the ILF treatment throughout the whole experimental period, with a significant difference in December (343.30 kg and 314.08 kg, respectively). The present study demonstrated numerically that greater numbers of L3 were recovered from pasture of the ILF, which could have resulted in higher contamination and lower performance of the animals.UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402020000100701Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal v.21 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animalinstname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBA10.1590/s1519-99402121152020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBAIAK,Barbara Haline BussGASPARINA,Jennifer MayaraMOLETTA,José LuisROCHA,Raquel Abdallah daeng2020-10-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-99402020000100701Revistahttp://www.rbspa.ufba.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbspa@ufba.br1519-99401519-9940opendoar:2020-10-28T00:00Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gastrointestinal nematode infection in Purunã heifers raised in conventional and integrated livestock forest systems
title Gastrointestinal nematode infection in Purunã heifers raised in conventional and integrated livestock forest systems
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal nematode infection in Purunã heifers raised in conventional and integrated livestock forest systems
BAIAK,Barbara Haline Buss
agroforestry systems
cattle
helminths
title_short Gastrointestinal nematode infection in Purunã heifers raised in conventional and integrated livestock forest systems
title_full Gastrointestinal nematode infection in Purunã heifers raised in conventional and integrated livestock forest systems
title_fullStr Gastrointestinal nematode infection in Purunã heifers raised in conventional and integrated livestock forest systems
title_full_unstemmed Gastrointestinal nematode infection in Purunã heifers raised in conventional and integrated livestock forest systems
title_sort Gastrointestinal nematode infection in Purunã heifers raised in conventional and integrated livestock forest systems
author BAIAK,Barbara Haline Buss
author_facet BAIAK,Barbara Haline Buss
GASPARINA,Jennifer Mayara
MOLETTA,José Luis
ROCHA,Raquel Abdallah da
author_role author
author2 GASPARINA,Jennifer Mayara
MOLETTA,José Luis
ROCHA,Raquel Abdallah da
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv BAIAK,Barbara Haline Buss
GASPARINA,Jennifer Mayara
MOLETTA,José Luis
ROCHA,Raquel Abdallah da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv agroforestry systems
cattle
helminths
topic agroforestry systems
cattle
helminths
description ABSTRACT The objective of the study was to evaluate the resistance of Purunã heifers to nematode infection in two different production systems. In this study, 29 heifers were divided into eight pickets, four in an integrated livestock forest system (ILF) and four in a conventional pasture system (CPS). Feces were collected monthly to perform the fecal egg count (FEC), evaluate the degree of infection caused by gastrointestinal nematodes in cattle, and carry out coproculture, to identify the genus of the parasites. In addition, animal body weight was determined to evaluate performance. On the same day as the measurements, forage samples were collected to determine the number of infective larvae per kilogram of dry matter (L3/kg DM) in each picket. There were no statistical differences in FECs between the treatments. Although no significant differences were observed in the recovery of L3/kg DM, the contamination was higher in the ILF compared to CPS in December (344 and 37.7 L3/kg DM, respectively) and January (312 and 0 L3/kg DM, respectively). In March, the CPS (321 L3/kg DM) presented higher contamination than the ILF (80.7 L3/kg DM), but with no statistical difference. The weight of the animals was higher for the CPS compared to the ILF treatment throughout the whole experimental period, with a significant difference in December (343.30 kg and 314.08 kg, respectively). The present study demonstrated numerically that greater numbers of L3 were recovered from pasture of the ILF, which could have resulted in higher contamination and lower performance of the animals.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402020000100701
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402020000100701
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1519-99402121152020
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal v.21 2020
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron:UFBA
instname_str Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron_str UFBA
institution UFBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
collection Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbspa@ufba.br
_version_ 1750297508747149312