Can We Co-Construct a Field of Management / Administration Engaged with the Majority?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faria, Alexandre
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Moutinho Abdalla, Márcio, Malheiros Guedes, Ana Lúcia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Organizações & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/33339
Resumo: Dynamics contrary to the life of the majority mobilized by neo-imperial neo-liberal capitalism evolving toward neo-fascist populism has become virtually invisible to the field of Management/Administration, which is driven by dynamics of appropriation-contention focused on alternatives and transmodern epistemes of the emerging South-East. We analyze this picture of radicalization of global coloniality within the context of counterrevolutionary neoliberalism facing dynamics of dewesternization and decoloniality from a South-North dialogue between Decolonial Theory/Option and Critical Realism. By proposing a critical/decolonial transmodern framework, we unveil dynamics of invisibilization/visibilization against the life of the majority, invisibilized by market sub-theorization and dominant discourse and by the liberal university and its business/management schools. In the end, we propose to recover the expanded relevance of “administration/management” engaged with the majority, through reappropriation dynamics based on de-subalternization of non-market and ‘de-celebration’ of free market.
id UFBA-4_443899218bee7f7e75162e87724d4b4f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/33339
network_acronym_str UFBA-4
network_name_str Organizações & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Can We Co-Construct a Field of Management / Administration Engaged with the Majority?Podemos Co-Construir um Campo de Gestão/Administração Engajado com a Maioria?decolonial theorycritical realismtransmodernityneoliberalismcolonialism.pensamento decolonialrealismo críticotransmodernidadeneoliberalismocolonialismo.Dynamics contrary to the life of the majority mobilized by neo-imperial neo-liberal capitalism evolving toward neo-fascist populism has become virtually invisible to the field of Management/Administration, which is driven by dynamics of appropriation-contention focused on alternatives and transmodern epistemes of the emerging South-East. We analyze this picture of radicalization of global coloniality within the context of counterrevolutionary neoliberalism facing dynamics of dewesternization and decoloniality from a South-North dialogue between Decolonial Theory/Option and Critical Realism. By proposing a critical/decolonial transmodern framework, we unveil dynamics of invisibilization/visibilization against the life of the majority, invisibilized by market sub-theorization and dominant discourse and by the liberal university and its business/management schools. In the end, we propose to recover the expanded relevance of “administration/management” engaged with the majority, through reappropriation dynamics based on de-subalternization of non-market and ‘de-celebration’ of free market.Dinâmicas contrárias à vida da maioria, mobilizadas pelo capitalismo neoliberal neoimperial rumo ao populismo neofascista, ficaram virtualmente invisibilizadas para o campo da gestão/administração. Analisamos esse quadro de radicalização da colonialidade global em uma era de império e descolonização protagonizado pelo neoliberalismo contrarrevolucionário, enfrentando dinâmicas de desocidentalização e descolonização, a partir de um diálogo Sul-Norte entre Teoria/Opção Pensamento Decolonial e Realismo Crítico. Por meio da proposição de um framework transmoderno crítico/decolonial, desvelamos dinâmicas de invisibilização/visibilização contrárias à vida da maioria alimentadas por dinâmicas de negação e apropriação-contenção de materialidades e epistemes sulistas, lideradas e invisibilizadas pelo discurso dominante de mercado livre que vem sendo reproduzido e contestado pela universidade liberal e suas escolas de negócios/gestão. Ao final, propomos a recuperação da relevância ampliada da “administração/gestão” engajada com a maioria, por meio de dinâmicas de reapropriação para a de-subalternização do invisibilizado engajado com a práxis transmoderna de libertação-emancipação e “des-celebração” do mercado livre.Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA2021-10-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/33339Organizações & Sociedade; Vol. 28 No. 98 (2021)Organizações & Sociedade; v. 28 n. 98 (2021)1984-92301413-585Xreponame:Organizações & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAengporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/33339/25407https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/33339/25408Copyright (c) 2021 Organizações & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaria, AlexandreMoutinho Abdalla, Márcio Malheiros Guedes, Ana Lúcia 2021-10-19T20:59:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/33339Revistahttp://www.revistaoes.ufba.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcandidab@ufba.br||revistaoes@ufba.br1984-92301413-585Xopendoar:2021-10-19T20:59:06Organizações & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can We Co-Construct a Field of Management / Administration Engaged with the Majority?
Podemos Co-Construir um Campo de Gestão/Administração Engajado com a Maioria?
title Can We Co-Construct a Field of Management / Administration Engaged with the Majority?
spellingShingle Can We Co-Construct a Field of Management / Administration Engaged with the Majority?
Faria, Alexandre
decolonial theory
critical realism
transmodernity
neoliberalism
colonialism.
pensamento decolonial
realismo crítico
transmodernidade
neoliberalismo
colonialismo.
title_short Can We Co-Construct a Field of Management / Administration Engaged with the Majority?
title_full Can We Co-Construct a Field of Management / Administration Engaged with the Majority?
title_fullStr Can We Co-Construct a Field of Management / Administration Engaged with the Majority?
title_full_unstemmed Can We Co-Construct a Field of Management / Administration Engaged with the Majority?
title_sort Can We Co-Construct a Field of Management / Administration Engaged with the Majority?
author Faria, Alexandre
author_facet Faria, Alexandre
Moutinho Abdalla, Márcio
Malheiros Guedes, Ana Lúcia
author_role author
author2 Moutinho Abdalla, Márcio
Malheiros Guedes, Ana Lúcia
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faria, Alexandre
Moutinho Abdalla, Márcio
Malheiros Guedes, Ana Lúcia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv decolonial theory
critical realism
transmodernity
neoliberalism
colonialism.
pensamento decolonial
realismo crítico
transmodernidade
neoliberalismo
colonialismo.
topic decolonial theory
critical realism
transmodernity
neoliberalism
colonialism.
pensamento decolonial
realismo crítico
transmodernidade
neoliberalismo
colonialismo.
description Dynamics contrary to the life of the majority mobilized by neo-imperial neo-liberal capitalism evolving toward neo-fascist populism has become virtually invisible to the field of Management/Administration, which is driven by dynamics of appropriation-contention focused on alternatives and transmodern epistemes of the emerging South-East. We analyze this picture of radicalization of global coloniality within the context of counterrevolutionary neoliberalism facing dynamics of dewesternization and decoloniality from a South-North dialogue between Decolonial Theory/Option and Critical Realism. By proposing a critical/decolonial transmodern framework, we unveil dynamics of invisibilization/visibilization against the life of the majority, invisibilized by market sub-theorization and dominant discourse and by the liberal university and its business/management schools. In the end, we propose to recover the expanded relevance of “administration/management” engaged with the majority, through reappropriation dynamics based on de-subalternization of non-market and ‘de-celebration’ of free market.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/33339
url https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/33339
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/33339/25407
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/33339/25408
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Organizações & Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Organizações & Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Organizações & Sociedade; Vol. 28 No. 98 (2021)
Organizações & Sociedade; v. 28 n. 98 (2021)
1984-9230
1413-585X
reponame:Organizações & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron:UFBA
instname_str Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron_str UFBA
institution UFBA
reponame_str Organizações & Sociedade (Online)
collection Organizações & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Organizações & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv candidab@ufba.br||revistaoes@ufba.br
_version_ 1799698971062435840

Registros relacionados