AFTER ALL, WHO WENT TO VOTE IN 2022

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nicolau, Jairo
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Caderno CRH
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55559
Resumo: The 2022 presidential election was the most competitive ever held in the country. In a contest with such uncertain outcomes, details that were often overlooked in past elections could make a difference in the result. Among these, voter abstention gained special attention in both rounds. The belief that voter turnout could influence the election outcome guided the campaign coordinators of Lula and Bolsonaro to act in favor of voter turnout during the final stretch of the campaign. This study analyzes the turnout rates and sociodemographic profile of the voters who went to the polls and those who abstained from voting in both rounds in 2022. We will also examine the profile of those who justified their vote. The results indicate that the voter turnout rate in the 2022 elections (79% in the first round, 80% in the second round) is similar to previous elections. The novelty is that the percentage of voters who turned out in the second round was, for the first time, higher than that of the first round.
id UFBA-7_804feb4dc3a1160adb8b4e7f4fc5360a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/55559
network_acronym_str UFBA-7
network_name_str Caderno CRH
repository_id_str
spelling AFTER ALL, WHO WENT TO VOTE IN 2022APRÈS TOUT, QUI EST ALLÉ VOTER EN 2022AFINAL, QUEM FOI VOTAR EM 2022EleiçõesComparecimentoVotoDemocraciaAbstençãoEleiçõesDemocraciaComparecimentoVotoRepresentação PolíticaElectionsTurnoutVoteDemocracyAbstentionÉlectionsParticipationVote Démocratie AbstentionThe 2022 presidential election was the most competitive ever held in the country. In a contest with such uncertain outcomes, details that were often overlooked in past elections could make a difference in the result. Among these, voter abstention gained special attention in both rounds. The belief that voter turnout could influence the election outcome guided the campaign coordinators of Lula and Bolsonaro to act in favor of voter turnout during the final stretch of the campaign. This study analyzes the turnout rates and sociodemographic profile of the voters who went to the polls and those who abstained from voting in both rounds in 2022. We will also examine the profile of those who justified their vote. The results indicate that the voter turnout rate in the 2022 elections (79% in the first round, 80% in the second round) is similar to previous elections. The novelty is that the percentage of voters who turned out in the second round was, for the first time, higher than that of the first round.L’élection présidentielle de 2022 a été la plus compétitive jamais organisée dans le pays. Dans une compétition aux résultats si incertains, des détails souvent négligés lors des élections passées pourraient faire la différence dans le résultat. Parmi ceux-ci, l’abstention des électeurs a suscité une attention particulière lors des deux tours. La conviction que la participation électorale pourrait influencer le résultat des élections a guidé les coordinateurs de campagne de Lula et Bolsonaro à agir en faveur de la participation électorale au cours de la dernière phase de la campagne. Cette étude analyse les taux de participation et le profil sociodémographique des électeurs qui se sont rendus aux urnes et de ceux qui se sont abstenus de voter lors des deux tours en 2022. Nous examinerons également le profil de ceux qui ont justifié leur vote. Les résultats indiquent que le taux de participation aux élections de 2022 (79 % au premier tour, 80 % au second tour) est similaire à celui des élections précédentes. La nouveauté réside dans le fait que le pourcentage d’électeurs ayant participé au second tour était, pour la première fois, supérieur à celui du premier tour.A eleição presidencial de 2022 foi a mais competitiva das já realizadas no país. Em uma disputa com resultados tão incertos, detalhes pouco considerados em pleitos passados poderiam fazer diferença para o resultado. Entre esses, a abstenção eleitoral ganhou um destaque especial nos dois turnos. A crença de que a taxa de comparecimento poderia influenciar o resultado da eleição orientou os coordenadores das campanhas de Lula e Bolsonaro a agir em favor do comparecimento eleitoral ao longo da reta final da campanha. Este trabalho analisa as taxas de comparecimento e o perfil sociodemográfico dos eleitores que foram às urnas e os que se abstiveram do pleito nos dois turnos em 2022. Também analisaremos o perfil daqueles que justificam o voto. Os resultados apontam que a taxa de comparecimento das eleições de 2022 (79% no primeiro turno, 80% no segundo turno) é semelhante à de eleições anteriores. A novidade é que o percentual dos eleitores que compareceram no segundo turno foi, pela primeira vez, superior aos do primeiro turno.Universidade Federal da Bahia2024-05-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextoTextArtigo avaliado pelos paresTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/5555910.9771/ccrh.v37i0.55559Caderno CRH; v. 37 (2024): Publicação Contínua; e0240071983-82390103-4979reponame:Caderno CRHinstname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55559/32675http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNicolau, Jairo2024-05-13T17:55:28Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/55559Revistahttps://portalseer.ufba.br/index.php/crh/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevcrh@ufba.br||revcrh@ufba.br1983-82390103-4979opendoar:2024-05-13T17:55:28Caderno CRH - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv AFTER ALL, WHO WENT TO VOTE IN 2022
APRÈS TOUT, QUI EST ALLÉ VOTER EN 2022
AFINAL, QUEM FOI VOTAR EM 2022
title AFTER ALL, WHO WENT TO VOTE IN 2022
spellingShingle AFTER ALL, WHO WENT TO VOTE IN 2022
Nicolau, Jairo
Eleições
Comparecimento
Voto
Democracia
Abstenção
Eleições
Democracia
Comparecimento
Voto
Representação Política
Elections
Turnout
Vote
Democracy
Abstention
Élections
Participation
Vote
Démocratie
Abstention
title_short AFTER ALL, WHO WENT TO VOTE IN 2022
title_full AFTER ALL, WHO WENT TO VOTE IN 2022
title_fullStr AFTER ALL, WHO WENT TO VOTE IN 2022
title_full_unstemmed AFTER ALL, WHO WENT TO VOTE IN 2022
title_sort AFTER ALL, WHO WENT TO VOTE IN 2022
author Nicolau, Jairo
author_facet Nicolau, Jairo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nicolau, Jairo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eleições
Comparecimento
Voto
Democracia
Abstenção
Eleições
Democracia
Comparecimento
Voto
Representação Política
Elections
Turnout
Vote
Democracy
Abstention
Élections
Participation
Vote
Démocratie
Abstention
topic Eleições
Comparecimento
Voto
Democracia
Abstenção
Eleições
Democracia
Comparecimento
Voto
Representação Política
Elections
Turnout
Vote
Democracy
Abstention
Élections
Participation
Vote
Démocratie
Abstention
description The 2022 presidential election was the most competitive ever held in the country. In a contest with such uncertain outcomes, details that were often overlooked in past elections could make a difference in the result. Among these, voter abstention gained special attention in both rounds. The belief that voter turnout could influence the election outcome guided the campaign coordinators of Lula and Bolsonaro to act in favor of voter turnout during the final stretch of the campaign. This study analyzes the turnout rates and sociodemographic profile of the voters who went to the polls and those who abstained from voting in both rounds in 2022. We will also examine the profile of those who justified their vote. The results indicate that the voter turnout rate in the 2022 elections (79% in the first round, 80% in the second round) is similar to previous elections. The novelty is that the percentage of voters who turned out in the second round was, for the first time, higher than that of the first round.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
texto
Text
Artigo avaliado pelos pares
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55559
10.9771/ccrh.v37i0.55559
url https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55559
identifier_str_mv 10.9771/ccrh.v37i0.55559
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55559/32675
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Caderno CRH; v. 37 (2024): Publicação Contínua; e024007
1983-8239
0103-4979
reponame:Caderno CRH
instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron:UFBA
instname_str Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron_str UFBA
institution UFBA
reponame_str Caderno CRH
collection Caderno CRH
repository.name.fl_str_mv Caderno CRH - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcrh@ufba.br||revcrh@ufba.br
_version_ 1799699056931373056

Registros relacionados