AUDIT OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL ARCHIVAL REPOSITORIES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Informação em Pauta |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/article/view/41787 |
Resumo: | This study discusses the implementation of archival repositories that conform to the Open Archival Information System and the need to audit them to assess their reliability. To this end, a bibliographic survey of previously published materials is carried out, with selection of: books that approach the perspectives of Archival science in the digital age and the challenge of reliable documentary custody; technical publications such as International Organization for Standardization and auditing standards; and scientific articles retrieved by the Google Scholar search tool, with thematic search related to the preservation of digital archival records, reliable digital repositories, information auditing and archival auditing. The archival repository is the prism of the discussion, since the comparison between the audit standards becomes the guiding category, thus, we obtain a no systematic review article. Thus, the audit standards are analyzed: Trustworthy Repository Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist, Catalog of Criteria for Trusted Digital Repositories from Network of Expertise in long-term STORage, Digital Repository Audit Method Based on Risk Assessment and Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories. Finally, a comparison of standards demonstrates that the Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories is best suited for auditing digital archival repositories. |
id |
UFC-15_d577e14ecc09baa99556923be5c27f5f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/41787 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-15 |
network_name_str |
Informação em Pauta |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
AUDIT OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL ARCHIVAL REPOSITORIESAuditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveisDigital preservationDigital repositoryDigital recordReliabilityAuthenticityPreservação digitalRepositório digitalArquivísticaDocumento digitalConfiabilidadeAutenticidadeRepositório Digital Confiável para Documentos ArquivísticosAuditoria de repositóriosArquivologiaThis study discusses the implementation of archival repositories that conform to the Open Archival Information System and the need to audit them to assess their reliability. To this end, a bibliographic survey of previously published materials is carried out, with selection of: books that approach the perspectives of Archival science in the digital age and the challenge of reliable documentary custody; technical publications such as International Organization for Standardization and auditing standards; and scientific articles retrieved by the Google Scholar search tool, with thematic search related to the preservation of digital archival records, reliable digital repositories, information auditing and archival auditing. The archival repository is the prism of the discussion, since the comparison between the audit standards becomes the guiding category, thus, we obtain a no systematic review article. Thus, the audit standards are analyzed: Trustworthy Repository Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist, Catalog of Criteria for Trusted Digital Repositories from Network of Expertise in long-term STORage, Digital Repository Audit Method Based on Risk Assessment and Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories. Finally, a comparison of standards demonstrates that the Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories is best suited for auditing digital archival repositories.Este estudo discute a implementação de repositórios arquivísticos em conformidade com o Sistema Aberto para Arquivamento de Informação e a necessidade de auditá-los para avaliar sua confiabilidade. Para tanto, realiza-se um levantamento bibliográfico de materiais previamente publicados, com seleção de: livros que abordam as perspectivas da Arquivística na era digital e o desafio da custódia documental confiável; publicações técnicas como as normas International Organization for Standardization e padrões de auditoria; e artigos científicos recuperados pela ferramenta de pesquisa Google Scholar, com busca temática relacionada à preservação de documentos arquivísticos digitais, repositórios digitais confiáveis, auditoria de informação e auditoria arquivística. O repositório arquivístico é o prisma da discussão, já a comparação entre os padrões de auditoria torna-se a categoria norteadora, logo, obtém-se um artigo de revisão assistemática. Dessa forma, são analisados os padrões de auditoria: Trustworthy Repository Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist, Catalogue of Criteria for Trusted Digital Repositories da Network of Expertise in long-term STORage, Digital Repository Audit Method Based on Risk Assessment e Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories. Por fim, o comparativo entre os padrões demonstra que o Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories é o mais indicado para auditar os repositórios arquivísticos digitais.Universidade Federal do Ceará2019-12-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/ziphttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/article/view/4178710.32810/2525-3468.ip.v4i2.2019.41787.156-172Informação em Pauta; Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Informação em Pauta; 156-172Informação em Pauta; v. 4 n. 2 (2019): Informação em Pauta; 156-1722525-346810.32810/2525-3468.ip.v4i2.2019reponame:Informação em Pautainstname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/article/view/41787/99880http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/article/view/41787/99921http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/article/view/41787/99922Copyright (c) 2019 Henrique Machado dos Santoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMachado dos Santos, Henrique2022-01-01T21:22:57Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/41787Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/oaiinformacaoempauta@gmail.com||2525-34682525-3468opendoar:2022-01-01T21:22:57Informação em Pauta - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
AUDIT OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL ARCHIVAL REPOSITORIES Auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis |
title |
AUDIT OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL ARCHIVAL REPOSITORIES |
spellingShingle |
AUDIT OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL ARCHIVAL REPOSITORIES Machado dos Santos, Henrique Digital preservation Digital repository Digital record Reliability Authenticity Preservação digital Repositório digital Arquivística Documento digital Confiabilidade Autenticidade Repositório Digital Confiável para Documentos Arquivísticos Auditoria de repositórios Arquivologia |
title_short |
AUDIT OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL ARCHIVAL REPOSITORIES |
title_full |
AUDIT OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL ARCHIVAL REPOSITORIES |
title_fullStr |
AUDIT OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL ARCHIVAL REPOSITORIES |
title_full_unstemmed |
AUDIT OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL ARCHIVAL REPOSITORIES |
title_sort |
AUDIT OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL ARCHIVAL REPOSITORIES |
author |
Machado dos Santos, Henrique |
author_facet |
Machado dos Santos, Henrique |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Machado dos Santos, Henrique |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Digital preservation Digital repository Digital record Reliability Authenticity Preservação digital Repositório digital Arquivística Documento digital Confiabilidade Autenticidade Repositório Digital Confiável para Documentos Arquivísticos Auditoria de repositórios Arquivologia |
topic |
Digital preservation Digital repository Digital record Reliability Authenticity Preservação digital Repositório digital Arquivística Documento digital Confiabilidade Autenticidade Repositório Digital Confiável para Documentos Arquivísticos Auditoria de repositórios Arquivologia |
description |
This study discusses the implementation of archival repositories that conform to the Open Archival Information System and the need to audit them to assess their reliability. To this end, a bibliographic survey of previously published materials is carried out, with selection of: books that approach the perspectives of Archival science in the digital age and the challenge of reliable documentary custody; technical publications such as International Organization for Standardization and auditing standards; and scientific articles retrieved by the Google Scholar search tool, with thematic search related to the preservation of digital archival records, reliable digital repositories, information auditing and archival auditing. The archival repository is the prism of the discussion, since the comparison between the audit standards becomes the guiding category, thus, we obtain a no systematic review article. Thus, the audit standards are analyzed: Trustworthy Repository Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist, Catalog of Criteria for Trusted Digital Repositories from Network of Expertise in long-term STORage, Digital Repository Audit Method Based on Risk Assessment and Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories. Finally, a comparison of standards demonstrates that the Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories is best suited for auditing digital archival repositories. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/article/view/41787 10.32810/2525-3468.ip.v4i2.2019.41787.156-172 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/article/view/41787 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.32810/2525-3468.ip.v4i2.2019.41787.156-172 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/article/view/41787/99880 http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/article/view/41787/99921 http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/informacaoempauta/article/view/41787/99922 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Henrique Machado dos Santos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Henrique Machado dos Santos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/zip |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Informação em Pauta; Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Informação em Pauta; 156-172 Informação em Pauta; v. 4 n. 2 (2019): Informação em Pauta; 156-172 2525-3468 10.32810/2525-3468.ip.v4i2.2019 reponame:Informação em Pauta instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Informação em Pauta |
collection |
Informação em Pauta |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Informação em Pauta - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
informacaoempauta@gmail.com|| |
_version_ |
1797231542788947968 |