Criteria for selection of experts for validation studies of nursing phenomena
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Rev Rene (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/4255 |
Resumo: | The study intended to identify the criteria used for picking out experts in researches on validation of nursing diagnosis, interventions, and outcomes. This is a descriptive study, developed from searching in databases/libraries, in June 2010, through the descriptors: Validation Studies, Content Validation, and experts, in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Initially, the title and abstracts of the productions were read and 31 of them were selected. Then, this material was read in full, resulting in 3 master dissertations, 4 doctoral dissertations, and 11 articles. Of these, prevailed articles in English, from Brazil, published in nursing journals, using Fehring´s adapted Model. It was so concluded that researchers should direct their criteria to the aims of the study, consider the limitations of the subject, respect the requirements for an expert, and use clear criteria, justifying the reasons for using each of them. |
id |
UFC-16_1c91acab04bccac2044b09ab380e04e6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/4255 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-16 |
network_name_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Criteria for selection of experts for validation studies of nursing phenomenaNursingvalidation studiespeer review.The study intended to identify the criteria used for picking out experts in researches on validation of nursing diagnosis, interventions, and outcomes. This is a descriptive study, developed from searching in databases/libraries, in June 2010, through the descriptors: Validation Studies, Content Validation, and experts, in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Initially, the title and abstracts of the productions were read and 31 of them were selected. Then, this material was read in full, resulting in 3 master dissertations, 4 doctoral dissertations, and 11 articles. Of these, prevailed articles in English, from Brazil, published in nursing journals, using Fehring´s adapted Model. It was so concluded that researchers should direct their criteria to the aims of the study, consider the limitations of the subject, respect the requirements for an expert, and use clear criteria, justifying the reasons for using each of them.Universidade Federal do Ceará2011-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/4255Rev Rene; Vol 12 No 2 (2011)Rev Rene; v. 12 n. 2 (2011)2175-67831517-3852reponame:Rev Rene (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCCopyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Renata PereiraMoreira, Rafaella PessoaFontenele, Fernanda CavalcanteAguiar, Adriana Sousa Carvalho deJoventino, Emanuella SilvaCarvalho, Emília Campos deeng2019-02-25T16:59:01Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/4255Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/renePUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/oairene@ufc.br||2175-67831517-3852opendoar:2019-02-25T16:59:01Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Criteria for selection of experts for validation studies of nursing phenomena |
title |
Criteria for selection of experts for validation studies of nursing phenomena |
spellingShingle |
Criteria for selection of experts for validation studies of nursing phenomena Melo, Renata Pereira Nursing validation studies peer review. |
title_short |
Criteria for selection of experts for validation studies of nursing phenomena |
title_full |
Criteria for selection of experts for validation studies of nursing phenomena |
title_fullStr |
Criteria for selection of experts for validation studies of nursing phenomena |
title_full_unstemmed |
Criteria for selection of experts for validation studies of nursing phenomena |
title_sort |
Criteria for selection of experts for validation studies of nursing phenomena |
author |
Melo, Renata Pereira |
author_facet |
Melo, Renata Pereira Moreira, Rafaella Pessoa Fontenele, Fernanda Cavalcante Aguiar, Adriana Sousa Carvalho de Joventino, Emanuella Silva Carvalho, Emília Campos de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Moreira, Rafaella Pessoa Fontenele, Fernanda Cavalcante Aguiar, Adriana Sousa Carvalho de Joventino, Emanuella Silva Carvalho, Emília Campos de |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo, Renata Pereira Moreira, Rafaella Pessoa Fontenele, Fernanda Cavalcante Aguiar, Adriana Sousa Carvalho de Joventino, Emanuella Silva Carvalho, Emília Campos de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nursing validation studies peer review. |
topic |
Nursing validation studies peer review. |
description |
The study intended to identify the criteria used for picking out experts in researches on validation of nursing diagnosis, interventions, and outcomes. This is a descriptive study, developed from searching in databases/libraries, in June 2010, through the descriptors: Validation Studies, Content Validation, and experts, in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Initially, the title and abstracts of the productions were read and 31 of them were selected. Then, this material was read in full, resulting in 3 master dissertations, 4 doctoral dissertations, and 11 articles. Of these, prevailed articles in English, from Brazil, published in nursing journals, using Fehring´s adapted Model. It was so concluded that researchers should direct their criteria to the aims of the study, consider the limitations of the subject, respect the requirements for an expert, and use clear criteria, justifying the reasons for using each of them. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/4255 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/4255 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene; Vol 12 No 2 (2011) Rev Rene; v. 12 n. 2 (2011) 2175-6783 1517-3852 reponame:Rev Rene (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
collection |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rene@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797174724774592512 |