Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Rev Rene (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2776 |
Resumo: | Objective: to evaluate the infrastructure of basic health units, as the adaptation to the standards recommended by theMinistry of Health. Methods: descriptive study with a quantitative approach, carried in 18 basic health units. For datacollection, we used a checklist built based on Ministerial Decree 2,226/09. Data analysis was performed using the StatisticalPackage for Social Sciences and a scoring scale (0-10) was used for the classification of health facilities. Results: 16.6% of theanalyzed units received the average score of 3.5; 16.6% received 3.0; 5.5%, 2.5; 16.6% received grade 2.0; 11.1%, 1.5; 11.1%,1.0; and 22.2% received 0.5 and, therefore, all units had inadequate physical structure. Conclusion: the city does not offerthe public a service that addresses the ideals standards in its structure in most of the inspected units. |
id |
UFC-16_26fda689a7ecee2788df335d9040078d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/2776 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-16 |
network_name_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health UnitsHealth Services EvaluationHealth InfrastructurePrimary Health Care.Objective: to evaluate the infrastructure of basic health units, as the adaptation to the standards recommended by theMinistry of Health. Methods: descriptive study with a quantitative approach, carried in 18 basic health units. For datacollection, we used a checklist built based on Ministerial Decree 2,226/09. Data analysis was performed using the StatisticalPackage for Social Sciences and a scoring scale (0-10) was used for the classification of health facilities. Results: 16.6% of theanalyzed units received the average score of 3.5; 16.6% received 3.0; 5.5%, 2.5; 16.6% received grade 2.0; 11.1%, 1.5; 11.1%,1.0; and 22.2% received 0.5 and, therefore, all units had inadequate physical structure. Conclusion: the city does not offerthe public a service that addresses the ideals standards in its structure in most of the inspected units.Universidade Federal do Ceará2015-11-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/277610.15253/2175-6783.2015000500002Rev Rene; Vol 16 No 5 (2015); 624-630Rev Rene; v. 16 n. 5 (2015); 624-6302175-67831517-3852reponame:Rev Rene (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2776/2156Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes, Raimundo Nonato SilvaPortela, Nytale Lindsay CardosoPedrosa, Aliny de OliveiraMonte, Luma Ravena SoaresCunha, Juliane Danielly SantosSoares, Thiego Ramon2018-12-04T15:53:36Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/2776Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/renePUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/oairene@ufc.br||2175-67831517-3852opendoar:2018-12-04T15:53:36Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
title |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units Gomes, Raimundo Nonato Silva Health Services Evaluation Health Infrastructure Primary Health Care. |
title_short |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
title_full |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
author |
Gomes, Raimundo Nonato Silva |
author_facet |
Gomes, Raimundo Nonato Silva Portela, Nytale Lindsay Cardoso Pedrosa, Aliny de Oliveira Monte, Luma Ravena Soares Cunha, Juliane Danielly Santos Soares, Thiego Ramon |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Portela, Nytale Lindsay Cardoso Pedrosa, Aliny de Oliveira Monte, Luma Ravena Soares Cunha, Juliane Danielly Santos Soares, Thiego Ramon |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gomes, Raimundo Nonato Silva Portela, Nytale Lindsay Cardoso Pedrosa, Aliny de Oliveira Monte, Luma Ravena Soares Cunha, Juliane Danielly Santos Soares, Thiego Ramon |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Health Services Evaluation Health Infrastructure Primary Health Care. |
topic |
Health Services Evaluation Health Infrastructure Primary Health Care. |
description |
Objective: to evaluate the infrastructure of basic health units, as the adaptation to the standards recommended by theMinistry of Health. Methods: descriptive study with a quantitative approach, carried in 18 basic health units. For datacollection, we used a checklist built based on Ministerial Decree 2,226/09. Data analysis was performed using the StatisticalPackage for Social Sciences and a scoring scale (0-10) was used for the classification of health facilities. Results: 16.6% of theanalyzed units received the average score of 3.5; 16.6% received 3.0; 5.5%, 2.5; 16.6% received grade 2.0; 11.1%, 1.5; 11.1%,1.0; and 22.2% received 0.5 and, therefore, all units had inadequate physical structure. Conclusion: the city does not offerthe public a service that addresses the ideals standards in its structure in most of the inspected units. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2776 10.15253/2175-6783.2015000500002 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2776 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15253/2175-6783.2015000500002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2776/2156 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene; Vol 16 No 5 (2015); 624-630 Rev Rene; v. 16 n. 5 (2015); 624-630 2175-6783 1517-3852 reponame:Rev Rene (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
collection |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rene@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797174725697339392 |