Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Rev Rene (Online) |
DOI: | 10.15253/2175-6783.2015000500002 |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2776 |
Resumo: | Objective: to evaluate the infrastructure of basic health units, as the adaptation to the standards recommended by theMinistry of Health. Methods: descriptive study with a quantitative approach, carried in 18 basic health units. For datacollection, we used a checklist built based on Ministerial Decree 2,226/09. Data analysis was performed using the StatisticalPackage for Social Sciences and a scoring scale (0-10) was used for the classification of health facilities. Results: 16.6% of theanalyzed units received the average score of 3.5; 16.6% received 3.0; 5.5%, 2.5; 16.6% received grade 2.0; 11.1%, 1.5; 11.1%,1.0; and 22.2% received 0.5 and, therefore, all units had inadequate physical structure. Conclusion: the city does not offerthe public a service that addresses the ideals standards in its structure in most of the inspected units. |
id |
UFC-16_26fda689a7ecee2788df335d9040078d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/2776 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-16 |
network_name_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
spelling |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health UnitsHealth Services EvaluationHealth InfrastructurePrimary Health Care.Objective: to evaluate the infrastructure of basic health units, as the adaptation to the standards recommended by theMinistry of Health. Methods: descriptive study with a quantitative approach, carried in 18 basic health units. For datacollection, we used a checklist built based on Ministerial Decree 2,226/09. Data analysis was performed using the StatisticalPackage for Social Sciences and a scoring scale (0-10) was used for the classification of health facilities. Results: 16.6% of theanalyzed units received the average score of 3.5; 16.6% received 3.0; 5.5%, 2.5; 16.6% received grade 2.0; 11.1%, 1.5; 11.1%,1.0; and 22.2% received 0.5 and, therefore, all units had inadequate physical structure. Conclusion: the city does not offerthe public a service that addresses the ideals standards in its structure in most of the inspected units.Universidade Federal do Ceará2015-11-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/277610.15253/2175-6783.2015000500002Rev Rene; Vol 16 No 5 (2015); 624-630Rev Rene; v. 16 n. 5 (2015); 624-6302175-67831517-3852reponame:Rev Rene (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2776/2156Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes, Raimundo Nonato SilvaPortela, Nytale Lindsay CardosoPedrosa, Aliny de OliveiraMonte, Luma Ravena SoaresCunha, Juliane Danielly SantosSoares, Thiego Ramon2018-12-04T15:53:36Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/2776Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/renePUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/oairene@ufc.br||2175-67831517-3852opendoar:2018-12-04T15:53:36Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
title |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units Gomes, Raimundo Nonato Silva Health Services Evaluation Health Infrastructure Primary Health Care. Gomes, Raimundo Nonato Silva Health Services Evaluation Health Infrastructure Primary Health Care. |
title_short |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
title_full |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the physical structure of Basic Health Units |
author |
Gomes, Raimundo Nonato Silva |
author_facet |
Gomes, Raimundo Nonato Silva Gomes, Raimundo Nonato Silva Portela, Nytale Lindsay Cardoso Pedrosa, Aliny de Oliveira Monte, Luma Ravena Soares Cunha, Juliane Danielly Santos Soares, Thiego Ramon Portela, Nytale Lindsay Cardoso Pedrosa, Aliny de Oliveira Monte, Luma Ravena Soares Cunha, Juliane Danielly Santos Soares, Thiego Ramon |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Portela, Nytale Lindsay Cardoso Pedrosa, Aliny de Oliveira Monte, Luma Ravena Soares Cunha, Juliane Danielly Santos Soares, Thiego Ramon |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gomes, Raimundo Nonato Silva Portela, Nytale Lindsay Cardoso Pedrosa, Aliny de Oliveira Monte, Luma Ravena Soares Cunha, Juliane Danielly Santos Soares, Thiego Ramon |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Health Services Evaluation Health Infrastructure Primary Health Care. |
topic |
Health Services Evaluation Health Infrastructure Primary Health Care. |
description |
Objective: to evaluate the infrastructure of basic health units, as the adaptation to the standards recommended by theMinistry of Health. Methods: descriptive study with a quantitative approach, carried in 18 basic health units. For datacollection, we used a checklist built based on Ministerial Decree 2,226/09. Data analysis was performed using the StatisticalPackage for Social Sciences and a scoring scale (0-10) was used for the classification of health facilities. Results: 16.6% of theanalyzed units received the average score of 3.5; 16.6% received 3.0; 5.5%, 2.5; 16.6% received grade 2.0; 11.1%, 1.5; 11.1%,1.0; and 22.2% received 0.5 and, therefore, all units had inadequate physical structure. Conclusion: the city does not offerthe public a service that addresses the ideals standards in its structure in most of the inspected units. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2776 10.15253/2175-6783.2015000500002 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2776 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15253/2175-6783.2015000500002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2776/2156 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene; Vol 16 No 5 (2015); 624-630 Rev Rene; v. 16 n. 5 (2015); 624-630 2175-6783 1517-3852 reponame:Rev Rene (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
collection |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rene@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1822180316337405953 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.15253/2175-6783.2015000500002 |