Construction and validation of a systematization instrument for nursing in intensive care
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Rev Rene (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2646 |
Resumo: | Objective: construction and validation of a systematization instrument for Nursing Care, characterizing the profile of patients of an intensive care unit in the north of Brazil. Methods: it was a descriptive methodological study that followed a nursing process model in five phases. Results: it was suggested that the instrument be constructed in two formats; one for admission and another for daily assessment. Some items were removed from the instrument according to content validation content by the nurses. Of the 45 patients evaluated, 60.0% were men, 44.0% were married, 40.0% had low education levels, chronic renal failure and cancer. The main nursing diagnoses were risk for infection (100.0%) and impaired physical mobility (97.8%). The main nursing interventions were: handwashing, changing intravenous access, performing aseptic techniques and moving patients every 2 hours. Conclusion: construction and content validation were carried out successfully, promoting instruments capable of providing quality nursing care for patients in intensive care. |
id |
UFC-16_41152326f0b466d5642d21afb948911d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/2646 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-16 |
network_name_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Construction and validation of a systematization instrument for nursing in intensive careNursing CareIntensive Care UnitValidation StudiesObjective: construction and validation of a systematization instrument for Nursing Care, characterizing the profile of patients of an intensive care unit in the north of Brazil. Methods: it was a descriptive methodological study that followed a nursing process model in five phases. Results: it was suggested that the instrument be constructed in two formats; one for admission and another for daily assessment. Some items were removed from the instrument according to content validation content by the nurses. Of the 45 patients evaluated, 60.0% were men, 44.0% were married, 40.0% had low education levels, chronic renal failure and cancer. The main nursing diagnoses were risk for infection (100.0%) and impaired physical mobility (97.8%). The main nursing interventions were: handwashing, changing intravenous access, performing aseptic techniques and moving patients every 2 hours. Conclusion: construction and content validation were carried out successfully, promoting instruments capable of providing quality nursing care for patients in intensive care.Universidade Federal do Ceará2015-08-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/264610.15253/2175-6783.2015000400002Rev Rene; Vol 16 No 4 (2015); 461-469Rev Rene; v. 16 n. 4 (2015); 461-4692175-67831517-3852reponame:Rev Rene (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2646/2032Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAraújo, Daniela Silva deFrança, Andreza Freire deMendonça, João Kelvin da SilvaBettencourt, Ana Rita de CássiaAmaral, Thatiana Lameira MacielPrado, Patricia Rezende do2018-12-04T15:41:02Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/2646Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/renePUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/oairene@ufc.br||2175-67831517-3852opendoar:2018-12-04T15:41:02Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Construction and validation of a systematization instrument for nursing in intensive care |
title |
Construction and validation of a systematization instrument for nursing in intensive care |
spellingShingle |
Construction and validation of a systematization instrument for nursing in intensive care Araújo, Daniela Silva de Nursing Care Intensive Care Unit Validation Studies |
title_short |
Construction and validation of a systematization instrument for nursing in intensive care |
title_full |
Construction and validation of a systematization instrument for nursing in intensive care |
title_fullStr |
Construction and validation of a systematization instrument for nursing in intensive care |
title_full_unstemmed |
Construction and validation of a systematization instrument for nursing in intensive care |
title_sort |
Construction and validation of a systematization instrument for nursing in intensive care |
author |
Araújo, Daniela Silva de |
author_facet |
Araújo, Daniela Silva de França, Andreza Freire de Mendonça, João Kelvin da Silva Bettencourt, Ana Rita de Cássia Amaral, Thatiana Lameira Maciel Prado, Patricia Rezende do |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
França, Andreza Freire de Mendonça, João Kelvin da Silva Bettencourt, Ana Rita de Cássia Amaral, Thatiana Lameira Maciel Prado, Patricia Rezende do |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Araújo, Daniela Silva de França, Andreza Freire de Mendonça, João Kelvin da Silva Bettencourt, Ana Rita de Cássia Amaral, Thatiana Lameira Maciel Prado, Patricia Rezende do |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nursing Care Intensive Care Unit Validation Studies |
topic |
Nursing Care Intensive Care Unit Validation Studies |
description |
Objective: construction and validation of a systematization instrument for Nursing Care, characterizing the profile of patients of an intensive care unit in the north of Brazil. Methods: it was a descriptive methodological study that followed a nursing process model in five phases. Results: it was suggested that the instrument be constructed in two formats; one for admission and another for daily assessment. Some items were removed from the instrument according to content validation content by the nurses. Of the 45 patients evaluated, 60.0% were men, 44.0% were married, 40.0% had low education levels, chronic renal failure and cancer. The main nursing diagnoses were risk for infection (100.0%) and impaired physical mobility (97.8%). The main nursing interventions were: handwashing, changing intravenous access, performing aseptic techniques and moving patients every 2 hours. Conclusion: construction and content validation were carried out successfully, promoting instruments capable of providing quality nursing care for patients in intensive care. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-08-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2646 10.15253/2175-6783.2015000400002 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2646 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15253/2175-6783.2015000400002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/2646/2032 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journal info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Northeast Network Nursing Journal |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene; Vol 16 No 4 (2015); 461-469 Rev Rene; v. 16 n. 4 (2015); 461-469 2175-6783 1517-3852 reponame:Rev Rene (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
collection |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rene@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797174725290491904 |