Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Lima, Jaqueline Costa, Ferreira, Gímerson Erick, Oliveira, João Lucas Campos de, Miraveti, Jocilene de Carvalho, Ribeiro, Mara Regina Rosa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Rev Rene (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858
Resumo: Objective: to analyze the levels of satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-efficacy in clinical simulations among health undergraduates and professionals. Methods: cross-sectional study based on Design Science Research Methodology, with 156 health professionals and 149 health undergraduates who participated in an educational session about personal protective equipment use during the COVID-19 pandemic, mediated by Rapid-Cycle Deliberate Practice. Participants responded to a social and work-related questionnaire and to validated scales. For descriptive analysis of independent samples, Chi-squared test and Student's t were used considering p<0.05 as significant. Results: we found generally high satisfaction levels (mean ± standard deviation: 4.72±0.58), self-confidence (4.44±0.78), and self-efficacy (4.03±1.17) for favorable items. There were significant statistical differences in seven items in the scale of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning in students, and in six items of the general self-efficacy scale, with p<0.05. Conclusion: undergraduates showed higher means of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning, while professionals had higher means of self-efficacy. These results can collaborate for the continuity of clinical simulation practices, increasing procedural safety and quality. Contributions to practice: the results show that the activities had a positive contribution, increasing learning opportunities and practical experiences that reflect on the excellence of the routine.
id UFC-16_64d924789ac9e5278eabec08f2656eb2
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/91858
network_acronym_str UFC-16
network_name_str Rev Rene (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionalsSatisfação, autoconfiança e autoeficácia no uso da simulação clínica: comparação entre acadêmicos e profissionais da saúdePersonal Protective Equipment; COVID-19; Simulation Training.Equipamento de Proteção Individual; COVID-19; Treinamento por Simulação.Objective: to analyze the levels of satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-efficacy in clinical simulations among health undergraduates and professionals. Methods: cross-sectional study based on Design Science Research Methodology, with 156 health professionals and 149 health undergraduates who participated in an educational session about personal protective equipment use during the COVID-19 pandemic, mediated by Rapid-Cycle Deliberate Practice. Participants responded to a social and work-related questionnaire and to validated scales. For descriptive analysis of independent samples, Chi-squared test and Student's t were used considering p<0.05 as significant. Results: we found generally high satisfaction levels (mean ± standard deviation: 4.72±0.58), self-confidence (4.44±0.78), and self-efficacy (4.03±1.17) for favorable items. There were significant statistical differences in seven items in the scale of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning in students, and in six items of the general self-efficacy scale, with p<0.05. Conclusion: undergraduates showed higher means of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning, while professionals had higher means of self-efficacy. These results can collaborate for the continuity of clinical simulation practices, increasing procedural safety and quality. Contributions to practice: the results show that the activities had a positive contribution, increasing learning opportunities and practical experiences that reflect on the excellence of the routine.Objetivo: analisar os níveis de satisfação, autoconfiança e autoeficácia no uso da simulação clínica entre acadêmicos e profissionais da saúde. Métodos: estudo transversal, baseado no Design Science Research Methodology, com 156 profissionais e 149 acadêmicos da área de saúde, que participaram da capacitação para uso de equipamentos de proteção individual na pandemia da COVID-19, mediada por Prática Deliberada em Ciclos Rápidos. Os participantes responderam ao questionário sociolaboral e escalas validadas. Utilizou-se análise descritiva, teste Qui-quadrado e t Student em amostras independentes para análise de dados, considerando-se significativo p<0,05. Resultados: verificou-se altos níveis gerais de satisfação (média ± desvio-padrão: 4,72±0,58), autoconfiança (4,44±0,78) e autoeficácia (4,03±1,17) para itens favoráveis). Na comparação, identificou-se diferenças estatísticas significativas em sete itens da escala de satisfação dos estudantes e autoconfiança com aprendizagem, e seis da escala de autoeficácia geral com p<0,05. Conclusão: os acadêmicos apresentaram maiores médias relacionadas à satisfação e autoconfiança com aprendizagem, enquanto profissionais apresentaram maiores médias relacionadas à autoeficácia, resultados que corroboram para continuidade de práticas envolvendo simulação clínica, propiciando segurança e qualidade aos procedimentos. Contribuições para a prática: os resultados apontam que as atividades contribuíram positivamente, potencializando oportunidades de aprendizagem e vivências práticas, que refletem na excelência das rotinas.Universidade Federal do Ceará2023-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/9185810.15253/2175-6783.20232491858Rev Rene; Vol. 24 (2023): Rev Rene; e91858Rev Rene; v. 24 (2023): Rev Rene; e918582175-67831517-3852reponame:Rev Rene (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858/249785http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858/249786Copyright (c) 2023 Rev Reneinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Viviane Christine dos Reis AlvesLima, Jaqueline CostaFerreira, Gímerson ErickOliveira, João Lucas Campos deMiraveti, Jocilene de CarvalhoRibeiro, Mara Regina Rosa2023-12-18T18:52:42Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/91858Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/renePUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/oairene@ufc.br||2175-67831517-3852opendoar:2023-12-18T18:52:42Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals
Satisfação, autoconfiança e autoeficácia no uso da simulação clínica: comparação entre acadêmicos e profissionais da saúde
title Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals
spellingShingle Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals
Almeida, Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves
Personal Protective Equipment; COVID-19; Simulation Training.
Equipamento de Proteção Individual; COVID-19; Treinamento por Simulação.
title_short Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals
title_full Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals
title_fullStr Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals
title_full_unstemmed Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals
title_sort Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals
author Almeida, Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves
author_facet Almeida, Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves
Lima, Jaqueline Costa
Ferreira, Gímerson Erick
Oliveira, João Lucas Campos de
Miraveti, Jocilene de Carvalho
Ribeiro, Mara Regina Rosa
author_role author
author2 Lima, Jaqueline Costa
Ferreira, Gímerson Erick
Oliveira, João Lucas Campos de
Miraveti, Jocilene de Carvalho
Ribeiro, Mara Regina Rosa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves
Lima, Jaqueline Costa
Ferreira, Gímerson Erick
Oliveira, João Lucas Campos de
Miraveti, Jocilene de Carvalho
Ribeiro, Mara Regina Rosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Personal Protective Equipment; COVID-19; Simulation Training.
Equipamento de Proteção Individual; COVID-19; Treinamento por Simulação.
topic Personal Protective Equipment; COVID-19; Simulation Training.
Equipamento de Proteção Individual; COVID-19; Treinamento por Simulação.
description Objective: to analyze the levels of satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-efficacy in clinical simulations among health undergraduates and professionals. Methods: cross-sectional study based on Design Science Research Methodology, with 156 health professionals and 149 health undergraduates who participated in an educational session about personal protective equipment use during the COVID-19 pandemic, mediated by Rapid-Cycle Deliberate Practice. Participants responded to a social and work-related questionnaire and to validated scales. For descriptive analysis of independent samples, Chi-squared test and Student's t were used considering p<0.05 as significant. Results: we found generally high satisfaction levels (mean ± standard deviation: 4.72±0.58), self-confidence (4.44±0.78), and self-efficacy (4.03±1.17) for favorable items. There were significant statistical differences in seven items in the scale of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning in students, and in six items of the general self-efficacy scale, with p<0.05. Conclusion: undergraduates showed higher means of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning, while professionals had higher means of self-efficacy. These results can collaborate for the continuity of clinical simulation practices, increasing procedural safety and quality. Contributions to practice: the results show that the activities had a positive contribution, increasing learning opportunities and practical experiences that reflect on the excellence of the routine.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858
10.15253/2175-6783.20232491858
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858
identifier_str_mv 10.15253/2175-6783.20232491858
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858/249785
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858/249786
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Rev Rene
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Rev Rene
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Rev Rene; Vol. 24 (2023): Rev Rene; e91858
Rev Rene; v. 24 (2023): Rev Rene; e91858
2175-6783
1517-3852
reponame:Rev Rene (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Rev Rene (Online)
collection Rev Rene (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rene@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797174724133912576

Registros relacionados