Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melo, Geórgia Alcântara Alencar
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Silva, Renan Alves, Aguiar, Letícia Lima, Pereira, Francisco Gilberto Fernandes, Galindo Neto, Nelson Miguel, Caetano, Joselany Áfio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Rev Rene (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788
Resumo: Objective: to validate the content of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire. Methods: validation study; the instrument was evaluated by 22 judges for clarity, comprehension, relevance, association with comfort and classification of items in the domains. The agreement among judges was analyzed through a binomial test and the Content Validation Index. Results: of the 48 items, ten were distributed in the physical domain, with agreement between 0.5 and 1.0; 11 in the socio-cultural domain (0.59 - 0.90); ten in the environmental (0.68 - 1.0); and 17 items in the psycho-spiritual (0.45 - 1.0). Regarding the criteria of clarity and association with comfort, all items obtained satisfactory evaluation and four did not reach the recommended agreement. Conclusion: the instrument is valid for measuring this construct and verifying the quality of care produced by the nursing staff according to the judges' perception, since the overall Content Validity Index was 0.81.
id UFC-16_eedd2de7155d35f5cb98bf2f7cf55137
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/41788
network_acronym_str UFC-16
network_name_str Rev Rene (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort QuestionnaireValidação do conteúdo da versão brasileira do General Comfort QuestionnairePatient Comfort; Validation Studies; Nursing; Nursing Theory.Conforto do Paciente; Estudos de Validação; Enfermagem; Teoria de Enfermagem.Objective: to validate the content of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire. Methods: validation study; the instrument was evaluated by 22 judges for clarity, comprehension, relevance, association with comfort and classification of items in the domains. The agreement among judges was analyzed through a binomial test and the Content Validation Index. Results: of the 48 items, ten were distributed in the physical domain, with agreement between 0.5 and 1.0; 11 in the socio-cultural domain (0.59 - 0.90); ten in the environmental (0.68 - 1.0); and 17 items in the psycho-spiritual (0.45 - 1.0). Regarding the criteria of clarity and association with comfort, all items obtained satisfactory evaluation and four did not reach the recommended agreement. Conclusion: the instrument is valid for measuring this construct and verifying the quality of care produced by the nursing staff according to the judges' perception, since the overall Content Validity Index was 0.81.Objetivo: validar o conteúdo da versão brasileira do General Comfort Questionnaire. Métodos: estudo de validação, no qual o instrumento foi avaliado por 22 juízes quanto à clareza, compreensão, relevância, associação com o conforto e classificação dos itens nos domínios. A concordância dos juízes foi analisada pelo teste binomial e Índice de Validação de Conteúdo. Resultados: dos 48 itens do instrumento, dez foram distribuídos no domínio físico, com concordância entre 0,5 e 1,0; 11 itens no sociocultural (0,59–0,90); dez itens no ambiental (0,68–1,0); e 17 itens no psicoespiritual (0,45–1,0). Quanto aos critérios de clareza e associação com o conforto, todos os itens obtiveram avaliação satisfatória e quatro não atingiram concordância recomendada. Conclusão: o instrumento torna-se válido para mensurar esse construto e verificar a qualidade do cuidado produzido pela equipe de enfermagem na percepção dos juízes, uma vez que o Índice de Validação de Conteúdo geral foi de 0,81.Universidade Federal do Ceará2019-11-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Originalapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/4178810.15253/2175-6783.20192041788Rev Rene; Vol 20 (2019): Rev Rene; e41788Rev Rene; v. 20 (2019): Rev Rene; e417882175-67831517-3852reponame:Rev Rene (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788/99506http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788/99508Copyright (c) 2019 Rev Renehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Geórgia Alcântara AlencarSilva, Renan Alves Aguiar, Letícia Lima Pereira, Francisco Gilberto Fernandes Galindo Neto, Nelson Miguel Caetano, Joselany Áfio 2020-05-28T15:34:47Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/41788Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/renePUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/oairene@ufc.br||2175-67831517-3852opendoar:2020-05-28T15:34:47Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire
Validação do conteúdo da versão brasileira do General Comfort Questionnaire
title Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire
spellingShingle Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire
Melo, Geórgia Alcântara Alencar
Patient Comfort; Validation Studies; Nursing; Nursing Theory.
Conforto do Paciente; Estudos de Validação; Enfermagem; Teoria de Enfermagem.
title_short Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire
title_full Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire
title_fullStr Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire
title_sort Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire
author Melo, Geórgia Alcântara Alencar
author_facet Melo, Geórgia Alcântara Alencar
Silva, Renan Alves
Aguiar, Letícia Lima
Pereira, Francisco Gilberto Fernandes
Galindo Neto, Nelson Miguel
Caetano, Joselany Áfio
author_role author
author2 Silva, Renan Alves
Aguiar, Letícia Lima
Pereira, Francisco Gilberto Fernandes
Galindo Neto, Nelson Miguel
Caetano, Joselany Áfio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melo, Geórgia Alcântara Alencar
Silva, Renan Alves
Aguiar, Letícia Lima
Pereira, Francisco Gilberto Fernandes
Galindo Neto, Nelson Miguel
Caetano, Joselany Áfio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Patient Comfort; Validation Studies; Nursing; Nursing Theory.
Conforto do Paciente; Estudos de Validação; Enfermagem; Teoria de Enfermagem.
topic Patient Comfort; Validation Studies; Nursing; Nursing Theory.
Conforto do Paciente; Estudos de Validação; Enfermagem; Teoria de Enfermagem.
description Objective: to validate the content of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire. Methods: validation study; the instrument was evaluated by 22 judges for clarity, comprehension, relevance, association with comfort and classification of items in the domains. The agreement among judges was analyzed through a binomial test and the Content Validation Index. Results: of the 48 items, ten were distributed in the physical domain, with agreement between 0.5 and 1.0; 11 in the socio-cultural domain (0.59 - 0.90); ten in the environmental (0.68 - 1.0); and 17 items in the psycho-spiritual (0.45 - 1.0). Regarding the criteria of clarity and association with comfort, all items obtained satisfactory evaluation and four did not reach the recommended agreement. Conclusion: the instrument is valid for measuring this construct and verifying the quality of care produced by the nursing staff according to the judges' perception, since the overall Content Validity Index was 0.81.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Original
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788
10.15253/2175-6783.20192041788
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788
identifier_str_mv 10.15253/2175-6783.20192041788
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788/99506
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788/99508
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Rev Rene
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Rev Rene
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Rev Rene; Vol 20 (2019): Rev Rene; e41788
Rev Rene; v. 20 (2019): Rev Rene; e41788
2175-6783
1517-3852
reponame:Rev Rene (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Rev Rene (Online)
collection Rev Rene (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rene@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797174733839532032

Registros relacionados