Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Rev Rene (Online) |
DOI: | 10.15253/2175-6783.20192041788 |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788 |
Resumo: | Objective: to validate the content of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire. Methods: validation study; the instrument was evaluated by 22 judges for clarity, comprehension, relevance, association with comfort and classification of items in the domains. The agreement among judges was analyzed through a binomial test and the Content Validation Index. Results: of the 48 items, ten were distributed in the physical domain, with agreement between 0.5 and 1.0; 11 in the socio-cultural domain (0.59 - 0.90); ten in the environmental (0.68 - 1.0); and 17 items in the psycho-spiritual (0.45 - 1.0). Regarding the criteria of clarity and association with comfort, all items obtained satisfactory evaluation and four did not reach the recommended agreement. Conclusion: the instrument is valid for measuring this construct and verifying the quality of care produced by the nursing staff according to the judges' perception, since the overall Content Validity Index was 0.81. |
id |
UFC-16_eedd2de7155d35f5cb98bf2f7cf55137 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/41788 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-16 |
network_name_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
spelling |
Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort QuestionnaireValidação do conteúdo da versão brasileira do General Comfort QuestionnairePatient Comfort; Validation Studies; Nursing; Nursing Theory.Conforto do Paciente; Estudos de Validação; Enfermagem; Teoria de Enfermagem.Objective: to validate the content of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire. Methods: validation study; the instrument was evaluated by 22 judges for clarity, comprehension, relevance, association with comfort and classification of items in the domains. The agreement among judges was analyzed through a binomial test and the Content Validation Index. Results: of the 48 items, ten were distributed in the physical domain, with agreement between 0.5 and 1.0; 11 in the socio-cultural domain (0.59 - 0.90); ten in the environmental (0.68 - 1.0); and 17 items in the psycho-spiritual (0.45 - 1.0). Regarding the criteria of clarity and association with comfort, all items obtained satisfactory evaluation and four did not reach the recommended agreement. Conclusion: the instrument is valid for measuring this construct and verifying the quality of care produced by the nursing staff according to the judges' perception, since the overall Content Validity Index was 0.81.Objetivo: validar o conteúdo da versão brasileira do General Comfort Questionnaire. Métodos: estudo de validação, no qual o instrumento foi avaliado por 22 juízes quanto à clareza, compreensão, relevância, associação com o conforto e classificação dos itens nos domínios. A concordância dos juízes foi analisada pelo teste binomial e Índice de Validação de Conteúdo. Resultados: dos 48 itens do instrumento, dez foram distribuídos no domínio físico, com concordância entre 0,5 e 1,0; 11 itens no sociocultural (0,59–0,90); dez itens no ambiental (0,68–1,0); e 17 itens no psicoespiritual (0,45–1,0). Quanto aos critérios de clareza e associação com o conforto, todos os itens obtiveram avaliação satisfatória e quatro não atingiram concordância recomendada. Conclusão: o instrumento torna-se válido para mensurar esse construto e verificar a qualidade do cuidado produzido pela equipe de enfermagem na percepção dos juízes, uma vez que o Índice de Validação de Conteúdo geral foi de 0,81.Universidade Federal do Ceará2019-11-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Originalapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/4178810.15253/2175-6783.20192041788Rev Rene; Vol 20 (2019): Rev Rene; e41788Rev Rene; v. 20 (2019): Rev Rene; e417882175-67831517-3852reponame:Rev Rene (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788/99506http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788/99508Copyright (c) 2019 Rev Renehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, Geórgia Alcântara AlencarSilva, Renan Alves Aguiar, Letícia Lima Pereira, Francisco Gilberto Fernandes Galindo Neto, Nelson Miguel Caetano, Joselany Áfio 2020-05-28T15:34:47Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/41788Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/renePUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/oairene@ufc.br||2175-67831517-3852opendoar:2020-05-28T15:34:47Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire Validação do conteúdo da versão brasileira do General Comfort Questionnaire |
title |
Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire |
spellingShingle |
Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire Melo, Geórgia Alcântara Alencar Patient Comfort; Validation Studies; Nursing; Nursing Theory. Conforto do Paciente; Estudos de Validação; Enfermagem; Teoria de Enfermagem. Melo, Geórgia Alcântara Alencar Patient Comfort; Validation Studies; Nursing; Nursing Theory. Conforto do Paciente; Estudos de Validação; Enfermagem; Teoria de Enfermagem. |
title_short |
Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire |
title_full |
Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire |
title_fullStr |
Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed |
Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire |
title_sort |
Content validation of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire |
author |
Melo, Geórgia Alcântara Alencar |
author_facet |
Melo, Geórgia Alcântara Alencar Melo, Geórgia Alcântara Alencar Silva, Renan Alves Aguiar, Letícia Lima Pereira, Francisco Gilberto Fernandes Galindo Neto, Nelson Miguel Caetano, Joselany Áfio Silva, Renan Alves Aguiar, Letícia Lima Pereira, Francisco Gilberto Fernandes Galindo Neto, Nelson Miguel Caetano, Joselany Áfio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Renan Alves Aguiar, Letícia Lima Pereira, Francisco Gilberto Fernandes Galindo Neto, Nelson Miguel Caetano, Joselany Áfio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo, Geórgia Alcântara Alencar Silva, Renan Alves Aguiar, Letícia Lima Pereira, Francisco Gilberto Fernandes Galindo Neto, Nelson Miguel Caetano, Joselany Áfio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Patient Comfort; Validation Studies; Nursing; Nursing Theory. Conforto do Paciente; Estudos de Validação; Enfermagem; Teoria de Enfermagem. |
topic |
Patient Comfort; Validation Studies; Nursing; Nursing Theory. Conforto do Paciente; Estudos de Validação; Enfermagem; Teoria de Enfermagem. |
description |
Objective: to validate the content of the Brazilian version of the General Comfort Questionnaire. Methods: validation study; the instrument was evaluated by 22 judges for clarity, comprehension, relevance, association with comfort and classification of items in the domains. The agreement among judges was analyzed through a binomial test and the Content Validation Index. Results: of the 48 items, ten were distributed in the physical domain, with agreement between 0.5 and 1.0; 11 in the socio-cultural domain (0.59 - 0.90); ten in the environmental (0.68 - 1.0); and 17 items in the psycho-spiritual (0.45 - 1.0). Regarding the criteria of clarity and association with comfort, all items obtained satisfactory evaluation and four did not reach the recommended agreement. Conclusion: the instrument is valid for measuring this construct and verifying the quality of care produced by the nursing staff according to the judges' perception, since the overall Content Validity Index was 0.81. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Original |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788 10.15253/2175-6783.20192041788 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15253/2175-6783.20192041788 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788/99506 http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/41788/99508 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Rev Rene https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Rev Rene https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene; Vol 20 (2019): Rev Rene; e41788 Rev Rene; v. 20 (2019): Rev Rene; e41788 2175-6783 1517-3852 reponame:Rev Rene (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Rev Rene (Online) |
collection |
Rev Rene (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Rev Rene (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rene@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1822180316866936832 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.15253/2175-6783.20192041788 |