On the accommodation of arguments based on ethical doctrines in Rainer Forst's theory of democracy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brum, Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19146
Resumo: The goal of this paper is to argue that Rainer Forst’s theory of democracy may be more receptive to arguments based in ethical doctrines (religious or not) than it at first seems. To do so, Forst’s general normative approach will be briefly exposed, followed by an exposition of his theory of democracy. Then, there will be stressed two features of such approach that may allow for such receptivity, and how they do so. Finally, it will be argued in the conclusion that such features allow for Forst’s approach to transit, albeit in a limited degree, between two extremes which must be equally avoided by any appropriate theory of democracy: the exclusion of some groups and the oppression of others.
id UFC-17_50472094613c0cb3f650c3660f5c9a35
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/19146
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling On the accommodation of arguments based on ethical doctrines in Rainer Forst's theory of democracySobre a acomodação de argumentos baseados em doutrinas éticas na teoria na democracia de Rainer ForstForst. Democracy. Public Sphere.Forst. Democracia. Esfera Pública.The goal of this paper is to argue that Rainer Forst’s theory of democracy may be more receptive to arguments based in ethical doctrines (religious or not) than it at first seems. To do so, Forst’s general normative approach will be briefly exposed, followed by an exposition of his theory of democracy. Then, there will be stressed two features of such approach that may allow for such receptivity, and how they do so. Finally, it will be argued in the conclusion that such features allow for Forst’s approach to transit, albeit in a limited degree, between two extremes which must be equally avoided by any appropriate theory of democracy: the exclusion of some groups and the oppression of others.O objetivo deste artigo é argumentar que a teoria de democracia de Rainer Forst pode ser mais receptiva a argumentos baseados em doutrinas éticas (religiosas ou não) do que aparenta. Para isso, será primeiramente exposta brevemente a abordagem normativa geral de Forst, seguida de sua teoria da democracia. A seguir, serão ressaltadas duas características de sua abordagem que podem dar margem a tal receptividade, e como elas o fazem. Por fim, será argumentado na conclusão que tais características permitem que a abordagem de Forst transite, ainda que em grau limitado, entre dois extremos que devem ser igualmente evitados por qualquer teoria apropriada da democracia: a exclusão de alguns grupos e a opressão de outros.Universidade Federal do Ceará2017-02-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19146Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 16Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 16Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 161984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19146/29864Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrum, Henrique2021-07-23T01:14:33Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/19146Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-23T01:14:33Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On the accommodation of arguments based on ethical doctrines in Rainer Forst's theory of democracy
Sobre a acomodação de argumentos baseados em doutrinas éticas na teoria na democracia de Rainer Forst
title On the accommodation of arguments based on ethical doctrines in Rainer Forst's theory of democracy
spellingShingle On the accommodation of arguments based on ethical doctrines in Rainer Forst's theory of democracy
Brum, Henrique
Forst. Democracy. Public Sphere.
Forst. Democracia. Esfera Pública.
title_short On the accommodation of arguments based on ethical doctrines in Rainer Forst's theory of democracy
title_full On the accommodation of arguments based on ethical doctrines in Rainer Forst's theory of democracy
title_fullStr On the accommodation of arguments based on ethical doctrines in Rainer Forst's theory of democracy
title_full_unstemmed On the accommodation of arguments based on ethical doctrines in Rainer Forst's theory of democracy
title_sort On the accommodation of arguments based on ethical doctrines in Rainer Forst's theory of democracy
author Brum, Henrique
author_facet Brum, Henrique
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brum, Henrique
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Forst. Democracy. Public Sphere.
Forst. Democracia. Esfera Pública.
topic Forst. Democracy. Public Sphere.
Forst. Democracia. Esfera Pública.
description The goal of this paper is to argue that Rainer Forst’s theory of democracy may be more receptive to arguments based in ethical doctrines (religious or not) than it at first seems. To do so, Forst’s general normative approach will be briefly exposed, followed by an exposition of his theory of democracy. Then, there will be stressed two features of such approach that may allow for such receptivity, and how they do so. Finally, it will be argued in the conclusion that such features allow for Forst’s approach to transit, albeit in a limited degree, between two extremes which must be equally avoided by any appropriate theory of democracy: the exclusion of some groups and the oppression of others.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19146
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19146
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19146/29864
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 16
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 16
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 16
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068845997883392

Registros relacionados