Hempel’s paradox is not an actual cognitive problem

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: López-Astorga, Miguel
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19140
Resumo: The paradox of the black ravens proposed by Carl Hempel is a problem if it is analyzed from standard logic. This is so because the equivalences in that logic can lead one to think that individuals should carry out certain actions that they do not usually do. In this paper, I show that, if we assume frameworks other than standard logic, the problem disappears, since those same actions are not expected. In particular, I use as examples two approaches: that of Stoic logic and that of the mental models theory.
id UFC-17_6efe6c01140d5b05b25ab3353b4d5abc
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/19140
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Hempel’s paradox is not an actual cognitive problemHempel’s paradox. Mental models. Reasoning. Standard logic. Stoic logic.Paradoxo de Hempel. Modelos mentais. Raciocínio. Lógica padrão. Lógica estoica.The paradox of the black ravens proposed by Carl Hempel is a problem if it is analyzed from standard logic. This is so because the equivalences in that logic can lead one to think that individuals should carry out certain actions that they do not usually do. In this paper, I show that, if we assume frameworks other than standard logic, the problem disappears, since those same actions are not expected. In particular, I use as examples two approaches: that of Stoic logic and that of the mental models theory.O paradoxo dos corvos negros proposto por Carl Hempel é um problema se for analisado a partir da lógica padrão. Isto é assim porque as equivalências nessa lógica pode levar a pensar que os indivíduos devem realizar determinadas ações que eles não costumam fazer. Neste artigo, vou mostrar que, se ignorarmos a lógica padrão e assumirmos outros sistemas, o problema desaparece, uma vez que essas mesmas ações não são esperadas. Em particular, eu uso como exemplos duas abordagens: a da lógica estoica e a da teoria dos modelos mentais.Universidade Federal do Ceará2017-02-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19140Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 16Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 16Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 161984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19140/29858Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLópez-Astorga, Miguel2021-03-13T20:23:05Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/19140Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-03-13T20:23:05Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hempel’s paradox is not an actual cognitive problem
title Hempel’s paradox is not an actual cognitive problem
spellingShingle Hempel’s paradox is not an actual cognitive problem
López-Astorga, Miguel
Hempel’s paradox. Mental models. Reasoning. Standard logic. Stoic logic.
Paradoxo de Hempel. Modelos mentais. Raciocínio. Lógica padrão. Lógica estoica.
title_short Hempel’s paradox is not an actual cognitive problem
title_full Hempel’s paradox is not an actual cognitive problem
title_fullStr Hempel’s paradox is not an actual cognitive problem
title_full_unstemmed Hempel’s paradox is not an actual cognitive problem
title_sort Hempel’s paradox is not an actual cognitive problem
author López-Astorga, Miguel
author_facet López-Astorga, Miguel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv López-Astorga, Miguel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hempel’s paradox. Mental models. Reasoning. Standard logic. Stoic logic.
Paradoxo de Hempel. Modelos mentais. Raciocínio. Lógica padrão. Lógica estoica.
topic Hempel’s paradox. Mental models. Reasoning. Standard logic. Stoic logic.
Paradoxo de Hempel. Modelos mentais. Raciocínio. Lógica padrão. Lógica estoica.
description The paradox of the black ravens proposed by Carl Hempel is a problem if it is analyzed from standard logic. This is so because the equivalences in that logic can lead one to think that individuals should carry out certain actions that they do not usually do. In this paper, I show that, if we assume frameworks other than standard logic, the problem disappears, since those same actions are not expected. In particular, I use as examples two approaches: that of Stoic logic and that of the mental models theory.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19140
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19140
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19140/29858
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 16
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 16
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 16
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068845987397632

Registros relacionados