Gender issues in the arena of education and the torsion and refutation guidelines
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/41045 |
Resumo: | This article aims to think about gender issues in the field of Brazilian education, understood as the arena where two perspectives on gender are disputed. In the first one, gender is understood as twisting, since it is thought in opposition to the notion instituted historically, posed as a problem for thought and apprehended as a possibility forged in culture and in relations of know-power. The second refers to the question of gender as a refutation to torsion, denies it as an artifact of culture, and establishes it as a biological and naturalistic dimension in the composition of sex and sexuality in which biological sex, sexuality and gender coincide. In this perspective gender issues are taken as an ideology, and as such, must be denied, silenced, refuted. The two perspectives, in the Brazilian present time, set up a scenario of debates and disputes about processes of constitution of the student subject and of the government of their sexual, social and political conducts. Reflections on such issues are theoretically grounded in the thinking of Michel Foucault and Judith Butler, anchored in the notions of “subject constitution,” “governmentality,” “discourse,” and “performativity.” |
id |
UFC-17_8bcba9d9e54a238dff2b1f4f4b512cdc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/41045 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-17 |
network_name_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Gender issues in the arena of education and the torsion and refutation guidelinesQuestões de gênero na arena da educação e as pautas de torsão e refutaçãoGender. Education. School. Human training. Disputes.Gênero. Educação. Escola. Formação humana. Disputas.This article aims to think about gender issues in the field of Brazilian education, understood as the arena where two perspectives on gender are disputed. In the first one, gender is understood as twisting, since it is thought in opposition to the notion instituted historically, posed as a problem for thought and apprehended as a possibility forged in culture and in relations of know-power. The second refers to the question of gender as a refutation to torsion, denies it as an artifact of culture, and establishes it as a biological and naturalistic dimension in the composition of sex and sexuality in which biological sex, sexuality and gender coincide. In this perspective gender issues are taken as an ideology, and as such, must be denied, silenced, refuted. The two perspectives, in the Brazilian present time, set up a scenario of debates and disputes about processes of constitution of the student subject and of the government of their sexual, social and political conducts. Reflections on such issues are theoretically grounded in the thinking of Michel Foucault and Judith Butler, anchored in the notions of “subject constitution,” “governmentality,” “discourse,” and “performativity.” O presente artigo objetiva pensar as questões de gênero no campo da educação brasileira, compreendida como arena onde são disputadas duas perspectivas sobre gênero. Na primeira entende-se o gênero como torção, pois este é pensado em contraposição à noção instituída historicamente, colocado como problema para o pensamento e apreendido como possibilidade forjada na cultura e nas relações de saber-poder. A segunda se refere à questão de gênero como refutação à torção, nega-o como artefato da cultura e assenta-o como dimensão biológica e naturalista na composição do sexo e da sexualidade na qual sexo biológico, sexualidade e gênero coincidem. Nesta perspectiva as questões de gênero são tomadas como uma ideologia, e enquanto tal, deve ser negada, silenciada, refutada. As duas perspectivas, no tempo presente brasileiro, instituem um cenário de debates e disputas acerca de processos de constituição do sujeito estudante e do governo das suas condutas sexuais, sociais e políticas. As reflexões sobre tais questões são fundamentadas teoricamente no pensamento de Michel Foucault e Judith Butler, com ancoragem nas noções “constituição do sujeito”, “governamentalidade”, “discurso” e “performatividade”. Universidade Federal do Ceará2019-04-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/41045Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 21Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 21Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 211984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/41045/97285Copyright (c) 2019 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Dorgival Gonçalves2021-07-22T16:48:00Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/41045Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-22T16:48Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Gender issues in the arena of education and the torsion and refutation guidelines Questões de gênero na arena da educação e as pautas de torsão e refutação |
title |
Gender issues in the arena of education and the torsion and refutation guidelines |
spellingShingle |
Gender issues in the arena of education and the torsion and refutation guidelines Fernandes, Dorgival Gonçalves Gender. Education. School. Human training. Disputes. Gênero. Educação. Escola. Formação humana. Disputas. |
title_short |
Gender issues in the arena of education and the torsion and refutation guidelines |
title_full |
Gender issues in the arena of education and the torsion and refutation guidelines |
title_fullStr |
Gender issues in the arena of education and the torsion and refutation guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gender issues in the arena of education and the torsion and refutation guidelines |
title_sort |
Gender issues in the arena of education and the torsion and refutation guidelines |
author |
Fernandes, Dorgival Gonçalves |
author_facet |
Fernandes, Dorgival Gonçalves |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Dorgival Gonçalves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gender. Education. School. Human training. Disputes. Gênero. Educação. Escola. Formação humana. Disputas. |
topic |
Gender. Education. School. Human training. Disputes. Gênero. Educação. Escola. Formação humana. Disputas. |
description |
This article aims to think about gender issues in the field of Brazilian education, understood as the arena where two perspectives on gender are disputed. In the first one, gender is understood as twisting, since it is thought in opposition to the notion instituted historically, posed as a problem for thought and apprehended as a possibility forged in culture and in relations of know-power. The second refers to the question of gender as a refutation to torsion, denies it as an artifact of culture, and establishes it as a biological and naturalistic dimension in the composition of sex and sexuality in which biological sex, sexuality and gender coincide. In this perspective gender issues are taken as an ideology, and as such, must be denied, silenced, refuted. The two perspectives, in the Brazilian present time, set up a scenario of debates and disputes about processes of constitution of the student subject and of the government of their sexual, social and political conducts. Reflections on such issues are theoretically grounded in the thinking of Michel Foucault and Judith Butler, anchored in the notions of “subject constitution,” “governmentality,” “discourse,” and “performativity.” |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/41045 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/41045 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/41045/97285 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 21 Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 21 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 21 1984-4255 1984-4247 reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
collection |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
argumentos@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068846874492928 |