Simplicity or singularity? Two conceptions of object in the Tratactus logico-philosophicus

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soutif, Ludovic
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19027
Resumo: In this paper, I argue, on the basis of textual evidence, that two conceptions of object instead of one are present in the Tractatus. One of them, based on the notions of a complete analysis of meaningful sentences and of absolute simplicity, was explicitly endorsed by Wittgenstein on purely logical grounds as the official doctrine of the book while the other, based on the notions of a multidimensional formal analysis and of singularity, was noncommittally entertained by him in the form of an analogy between the object’s relation to its ‘surrounding’ logical space (of states of affairs) and the relation of a phenomenal item to the specific sense modality it belongs to and in which it is located. Armed with this distinction, I attempt to clarify the debate around the issue of the exemplarity of certain categories of things (particulars, universals) with respect to the logical notion of a Tractarian object. I also give my interpretation of how Wittgenstein deals in the Tractatus with the problem of the incompatibility of certain color ascriptions, and of the related episode of the abandonment of logical atomism in the early so-called ‘transitional period’.
id UFC-17_9d62fef995e664dca2669df73e93728c
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/19027
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Simplicity or singularity? Two conceptions of object in the Tratactus logico-philosophicusTractatus logico-philosophicus. Object. Simplicity. Singularity. Exemplarity. Multidimensional sensory spaces. Logical Atomism.Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Objeto. Simplicidade. Singularidade. Exemplaridade. Espaços sensoriais multidimensionais. Atomismo lógico.In this paper, I argue, on the basis of textual evidence, that two conceptions of object instead of one are present in the Tractatus. One of them, based on the notions of a complete analysis of meaningful sentences and of absolute simplicity, was explicitly endorsed by Wittgenstein on purely logical grounds as the official doctrine of the book while the other, based on the notions of a multidimensional formal analysis and of singularity, was noncommittally entertained by him in the form of an analogy between the object’s relation to its ‘surrounding’ logical space (of states of affairs) and the relation of a phenomenal item to the specific sense modality it belongs to and in which it is located. Armed with this distinction, I attempt to clarify the debate around the issue of the exemplarity of certain categories of things (particulars, universals) with respect to the logical notion of a Tractarian object. I also give my interpretation of how Wittgenstein deals in the Tractatus with the problem of the incompatibility of certain color ascriptions, and of the related episode of the abandonment of logical atomism in the early so-called ‘transitional period’.No presente artigo, argumenta-se, com base em evidências textuais, que há duas concepções de objeto presentes no Tractatus. A primeira, norteada pelas noções de analizabilidade completa e de simplicidade absoluta, foi explicitamente assumida por Wittgenstein como doutrina oficial do livro por razões puramente lógicas. A segunda, norteada pelas noções de análise formal multidimensional e de singularidade, só foi contemplada por ele com base em uma analogia entre a relação do objeto (em sentido lógico) ao espaço de possíveis estados de coisas que o ‘cerca’ e a de um item fenomenal qualquer à modalidade sensorial na qual está localizado. À luz dessa distinção, tenta-se clarificar o debate acerca da exemplaridade (ou não exemplaridade) de certas categorias de coisas (particulares, universais) em relação à noção tractariana de objeto. E dá ainda uma interpretação do tratamento por Wittgenstein do problema da incompatibilidade de certas atribuições de cores no Tractatuse do episódio do abandono do atomismo lógico no início do chamado ‘período intermediário’.Universidade Federal do Ceará2013-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19027Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 10Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 10Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 101984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19027/29746Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoutif, Ludovic2021-03-11T16:41:17Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/19027Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-03-11T16:41:17Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Simplicity or singularity? Two conceptions of object in the Tratactus logico-philosophicus
title Simplicity or singularity? Two conceptions of object in the Tratactus logico-philosophicus
spellingShingle Simplicity or singularity? Two conceptions of object in the Tratactus logico-philosophicus
Soutif, Ludovic
Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Object. Simplicity. Singularity. Exemplarity. Multidimensional sensory spaces. Logical Atomism.
Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Objeto. Simplicidade. Singularidade. Exemplaridade. Espaços sensoriais multidimensionais. Atomismo lógico.
title_short Simplicity or singularity? Two conceptions of object in the Tratactus logico-philosophicus
title_full Simplicity or singularity? Two conceptions of object in the Tratactus logico-philosophicus
title_fullStr Simplicity or singularity? Two conceptions of object in the Tratactus logico-philosophicus
title_full_unstemmed Simplicity or singularity? Two conceptions of object in the Tratactus logico-philosophicus
title_sort Simplicity or singularity? Two conceptions of object in the Tratactus logico-philosophicus
author Soutif, Ludovic
author_facet Soutif, Ludovic
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soutif, Ludovic
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Object. Simplicity. Singularity. Exemplarity. Multidimensional sensory spaces. Logical Atomism.
Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Objeto. Simplicidade. Singularidade. Exemplaridade. Espaços sensoriais multidimensionais. Atomismo lógico.
topic Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Object. Simplicity. Singularity. Exemplarity. Multidimensional sensory spaces. Logical Atomism.
Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Objeto. Simplicidade. Singularidade. Exemplaridade. Espaços sensoriais multidimensionais. Atomismo lógico.
description In this paper, I argue, on the basis of textual evidence, that two conceptions of object instead of one are present in the Tractatus. One of them, based on the notions of a complete analysis of meaningful sentences and of absolute simplicity, was explicitly endorsed by Wittgenstein on purely logical grounds as the official doctrine of the book while the other, based on the notions of a multidimensional formal analysis and of singularity, was noncommittally entertained by him in the form of an analogy between the object’s relation to its ‘surrounding’ logical space (of states of affairs) and the relation of a phenomenal item to the specific sense modality it belongs to and in which it is located. Armed with this distinction, I attempt to clarify the debate around the issue of the exemplarity of certain categories of things (particulars, universals) with respect to the logical notion of a Tractarian object. I also give my interpretation of how Wittgenstein deals in the Tractatus with the problem of the incompatibility of certain color ascriptions, and of the related episode of the abandonment of logical atomism in the early so-called ‘transitional period’.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19027
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19027
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19027/29746
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 10
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 10
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 10
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068845483032576