The moderating ideology of the Brazilian FFAA and the opinion of Hobbes and Constant

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teixeira Filho, Francisco Luciano
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/91779
Resumo: In 2022, the Brazilian Armed Forces reaffirmed an old interventionist ideology that marked the history of the Republic of Brazil. The text seeks to show that such military ideology does not find a pretext in the history of modern political ideas. Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), at first, and then Benjamin Constant (1767-1830), two ideologists who shaped today's understanding of the State, understand representative institutions in disagreement with any non-submission of the FFAA to Political Power. In this way, the ideology of military intervention is, according to the history of ideas, incompatible with the modern conception of the State.
id UFC-17_f07f97bbe284ea6f3b1e24051f5a20d2
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/91779
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The moderating ideology of the Brazilian FFAA and the opinion of Hobbes and ConstantA ideologia moderadora das FFAA brasileiras e a opinião de Hobbes e ConstantIntervenção militar. Estado. Política. Brasil.Military intervention. State. Policy. Brazil.In 2022, the Brazilian Armed Forces reaffirmed an old interventionist ideology that marked the history of the Republic of Brazil. The text seeks to show that such military ideology does not find a pretext in the history of modern political ideas. Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), at first, and then Benjamin Constant (1767-1830), two ideologists who shaped today's understanding of the State, understand representative institutions in disagreement with any non-submission of the FFAA to Political Power. In this way, the ideology of military intervention is, according to the history of ideas, incompatible with the modern conception of the State.As Forças Armadas brasileiras reafirmaram, em 2022, uma antiga ideologia intervencionista que marcou a história da República do Brasil. O texto busca mostrar que tal ideologia militar não encontra pretexto na história das ideias políticas modernas. Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), inicialmente, e depois Benjamin Constant (1767-1830), dois ideólogos que moldaram o entendimento hodierno do Estado, compreendem as instituições representativas em desacordo com qualquer insubmissão das FFAA ao poder político. Dessa forma, a ideologia da intervenção militar é, de acordo com a história das ideias, incompatível com a concepção moderna de Estado.Universidade Federal do Ceará2024-01-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/9177910.36517/Argumentos.31.13Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No. 31 (2024); 145-159Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 31 (2024); 145-159Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 31 (2024); 145-1591984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/91779/250063Copyright (c) 2024 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira Filho, Francisco Luciano2024-02-17T18:02:14Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/91779Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2024-02-17T18:02:14Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The moderating ideology of the Brazilian FFAA and the opinion of Hobbes and Constant
A ideologia moderadora das FFAA brasileiras e a opinião de Hobbes e Constant
title The moderating ideology of the Brazilian FFAA and the opinion of Hobbes and Constant
spellingShingle The moderating ideology of the Brazilian FFAA and the opinion of Hobbes and Constant
Teixeira Filho, Francisco Luciano
Intervenção militar. Estado. Política. Brasil.
Military intervention. State. Policy. Brazil.
title_short The moderating ideology of the Brazilian FFAA and the opinion of Hobbes and Constant
title_full The moderating ideology of the Brazilian FFAA and the opinion of Hobbes and Constant
title_fullStr The moderating ideology of the Brazilian FFAA and the opinion of Hobbes and Constant
title_full_unstemmed The moderating ideology of the Brazilian FFAA and the opinion of Hobbes and Constant
title_sort The moderating ideology of the Brazilian FFAA and the opinion of Hobbes and Constant
author Teixeira Filho, Francisco Luciano
author_facet Teixeira Filho, Francisco Luciano
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teixeira Filho, Francisco Luciano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intervenção militar. Estado. Política. Brasil.
Military intervention. State. Policy. Brazil.
topic Intervenção militar. Estado. Política. Brasil.
Military intervention. State. Policy. Brazil.
description In 2022, the Brazilian Armed Forces reaffirmed an old interventionist ideology that marked the history of the Republic of Brazil. The text seeks to show that such military ideology does not find a pretext in the history of modern political ideas. Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), at first, and then Benjamin Constant (1767-1830), two ideologists who shaped today's understanding of the State, understand representative institutions in disagreement with any non-submission of the FFAA to Political Power. In this way, the ideology of military intervention is, according to the history of ideas, incompatible with the modern conception of the State.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/91779
10.36517/Argumentos.31.13
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/91779
identifier_str_mv 10.36517/Argumentos.31.13
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/91779/250063
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No. 31 (2024); 145-159
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 31 (2024); 145-159
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 31 (2024); 145-159
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068844909461504

Registros relacionados