The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19069 |
Resumo: | There is in the narrative contexto of Euthydemus the absence of a strict separation between philosophy anda eristic. The dialogue ends in a aporia that stages a misadventure of two friends, Socrates and Crito, before the inability to mark a border in that philosophy is crucial to the education of young people, at the expense of eristic. Despite constant insistence of Socrates, in his narrative, to delimit the need to exhort young people to the love of wisdom, a methodological confusion does not yet provide a separation between philosphy and eristic, in a way that they still appear to be the same activity. Accordingly, only through a behavioral distinction between sophist and philosopher is that the narrative can move toward this separation. Before that, the objective of this work is to show how the narrative of Socrates, in the Euthydemus, is an attempt to buid an image of the philosopher as different from the sophist, in order to mark the separation between philosophy and eristic. |
id |
UFC-17_f62e79f76893fe1c5f8e26661b4fb8c6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/19069 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-17 |
network_name_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The philosopher's image in Plato's EuthydemusA imagem do filósofo no Eutidemo de PlatãoPhilosophy. Eristic. Sophist. Socrates.Filosofia. Erisitica. Sofista. Sócrates.There is in the narrative contexto of Euthydemus the absence of a strict separation between philosophy anda eristic. The dialogue ends in a aporia that stages a misadventure of two friends, Socrates and Crito, before the inability to mark a border in that philosophy is crucial to the education of young people, at the expense of eristic. Despite constant insistence of Socrates, in his narrative, to delimit the need to exhort young people to the love of wisdom, a methodological confusion does not yet provide a separation between philosphy and eristic, in a way that they still appear to be the same activity. Accordingly, only through a behavioral distinction between sophist and philosopher is that the narrative can move toward this separation. Before that, the objective of this work is to show how the narrative of Socrates, in the Euthydemus, is an attempt to buid an image of the philosopher as different from the sophist, in order to mark the separation between philosophy and eristic. Há no contexto narrativo do Eutidemo a ausência de uma separação rígida entre erística e filosofia. O diálogo se encerra em uma aporia que encena certa desventura dos dois amigos Sócrates e Críton diante da inabilidade de demarcar uma fronteira em que a filosofia seja determinante para a educação dos jovens, em detrimento da erística. Apesar da constante insistência de Sócrates, em sua narrativa, para delimitar a necessidade de exortar os jovens ao amor à sabedoria, uma confusão metodológica ainda não permite estabelecer uma separação entre erística e filosofia, de um modo que ambas ainda parecem ser a mesma atividade. Nesse sentido, somente através de uma distinção de comportamento entre sofista e filósofo é que a narrativa pode se encaminhar para essa separação. Diante disso, o objetivo deste trabalho é mostrar como a narrativa de Sócrates, no Eutidemo, constitui uma tentativa de construir uma imagem do filósofo como diferente do sofista, para poder demarcar essa separação entre erística e filosofia. Universidade Federal do Ceará2014-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19069Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 12Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 12Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 121984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19069/29787Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, José André2021-07-23T16:47:54Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/19069Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-23T16:47:54Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus A imagem do filósofo no Eutidemo de Platão |
title |
The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus |
spellingShingle |
The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus Ribeiro, José André Philosophy. Eristic. Sophist. Socrates. Filosofia. Erisitica. Sofista. Sócrates. |
title_short |
The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus |
title_full |
The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus |
title_fullStr |
The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus |
title_full_unstemmed |
The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus |
title_sort |
The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus |
author |
Ribeiro, José André |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, José André |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, José André |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Philosophy. Eristic. Sophist. Socrates. Filosofia. Erisitica. Sofista. Sócrates. |
topic |
Philosophy. Eristic. Sophist. Socrates. Filosofia. Erisitica. Sofista. Sócrates. |
description |
There is in the narrative contexto of Euthydemus the absence of a strict separation between philosophy anda eristic. The dialogue ends in a aporia that stages a misadventure of two friends, Socrates and Crito, before the inability to mark a border in that philosophy is crucial to the education of young people, at the expense of eristic. Despite constant insistence of Socrates, in his narrative, to delimit the need to exhort young people to the love of wisdom, a methodological confusion does not yet provide a separation between philosphy and eristic, in a way that they still appear to be the same activity. Accordingly, only through a behavioral distinction between sophist and philosopher is that the narrative can move toward this separation. Before that, the objective of this work is to show how the narrative of Socrates, in the Euthydemus, is an attempt to buid an image of the philosopher as different from the sophist, in order to mark the separation between philosophy and eristic. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19069 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19069 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19069/29787 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 12 Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 12 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 12 1984-4255 1984-4247 reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
collection |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
argumentos@ufc.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068845881491456 |