The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, José André
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19069
Resumo: There is in the narrative contexto of Euthydemus the absence of a strict separation between philosophy anda eristic. The dialogue ends in a aporia that stages a misadventure of two friends, Socrates and Crito, before the inability to mark a border in that philosophy is crucial to the education of young people, at the expense of eristic. Despite constant insistence of Socrates, in his narrative, to delimit the need to exhort young people to the love of wisdom, a methodological confusion does not yet provide a separation between philosphy and eristic, in a way that they still appear to be the same activity. Accordingly, only through a behavioral distinction between sophist and philosopher is that the narrative can move toward this separation. Before that, the objective of this work is to show how the narrative of Socrates, in the Euthydemus, is an attempt to buid an image of the philosopher as different from the sophist, in order to mark the separation between philosophy and eristic.
id UFC-17_f62e79f76893fe1c5f8e26661b4fb8c6
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/19069
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The philosopher's image in Plato's EuthydemusA imagem do filósofo no Eutidemo de PlatãoPhilosophy. Eristic. Sophist. Socrates.Filosofia. Erisitica. Sofista. Sócrates.There is in the narrative contexto of Euthydemus the absence of a strict separation between philosophy anda eristic. The dialogue ends in a aporia that stages a misadventure of two friends, Socrates and Crito, before the inability to mark a border in that philosophy is crucial to the education of young people, at the expense of eristic. Despite constant insistence of Socrates, in his narrative, to delimit the need to exhort young people to the love of wisdom, a methodological confusion does not yet provide a separation between philosphy and eristic, in a way that they still appear to be the same activity. Accordingly, only through a behavioral distinction between sophist and philosopher is that the narrative can move toward this separation. Before that, the objective of this work is to show how the narrative of Socrates, in the Euthydemus, is an attempt to buid an image of the philosopher as different from the sophist, in order to mark the separation between philosophy and eristic. Há no contexto narrativo do Eutidemo a ausência de uma separação rígida entre erística e filosofia. O diálogo se encerra em uma aporia que encena certa desventura dos dois amigos Sócrates e Críton diante da inabilidade de demarcar uma fronteira em que a filosofia seja determinante para a educação dos jovens, em detrimento da erística. Apesar da constante insistência de Sócrates, em sua narrativa, para delimitar a necessidade de exortar os jovens ao amor à sabedoria, uma confusão metodológica ainda não permite estabelecer uma separação entre erística e filosofia, de um modo que ambas ainda parecem ser a mesma atividade. Nesse sentido, somente através de uma distinção de comportamento entre sofista e filósofo é que a narrativa pode se encaminhar para essa separação. Diante disso, o objetivo deste trabalho é mostrar como a narrativa de Sócrates, no Eutidemo, constitui uma tentativa de construir uma imagem do filósofo como diferente do sofista, para poder demarcar essa separação entre erística e filosofia. Universidade Federal do Ceará2014-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19069Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 12Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 12Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 121984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19069/29787Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, José André2021-07-23T16:47:54Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/19069Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2021-07-23T16:47:54Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus
A imagem do filósofo no Eutidemo de Platão
title The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus
spellingShingle The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus
Ribeiro, José André
Philosophy. Eristic. Sophist. Socrates.
Filosofia. Erisitica. Sofista. Sócrates.
title_short The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus
title_full The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus
title_fullStr The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus
title_full_unstemmed The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus
title_sort The philosopher's image in Plato's Euthydemus
author Ribeiro, José André
author_facet Ribeiro, José André
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, José André
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Philosophy. Eristic. Sophist. Socrates.
Filosofia. Erisitica. Sofista. Sócrates.
topic Philosophy. Eristic. Sophist. Socrates.
Filosofia. Erisitica. Sofista. Sócrates.
description There is in the narrative contexto of Euthydemus the absence of a strict separation between philosophy anda eristic. The dialogue ends in a aporia that stages a misadventure of two friends, Socrates and Crito, before the inability to mark a border in that philosophy is crucial to the education of young people, at the expense of eristic. Despite constant insistence of Socrates, in his narrative, to delimit the need to exhort young people to the love of wisdom, a methodological confusion does not yet provide a separation between philosphy and eristic, in a way that they still appear to be the same activity. Accordingly, only through a behavioral distinction between sophist and philosopher is that the narrative can move toward this separation. Before that, the objective of this work is to show how the narrative of Socrates, in the Euthydemus, is an attempt to buid an image of the philosopher as different from the sophist, in order to mark the separation between philosophy and eristic.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19069
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19069
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/19069/29787
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Argumentos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 12
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 12
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 12
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068845881491456