Deleuze and two appropriations of the nietzschean dionysian for a thought without a subject

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lelis Matos, Leandro
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/80584
Resumo: The aim of this article is to highlight and discuss two moments in which Deleuze appropriates the Nietzschean notion of Dionysian, to compose the program of a thought without image in opposition to the thought of representation.The first appropriation concerns the question of a new philosophical discourse in favor of individuations and singularities prior to the “subject form”. The second appropriation corresponds to the defense of an immanent thought, which occurs on the surface and does not resort to well-centered models. It is about verifying at which points Nietzsche's influence was decisive for Deleuze to compose a new thought in Difference and Repetition, highlighting the notions of individuation, singularity, difference and art.
id UFC-17_ffc0366141315eb0f32d212d7fce9815
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/80584
network_acronym_str UFC-17
network_name_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Deleuze and two appropriations of the nietzschean dionysian for a thought without a subjectDeleuze e duas apropriações do dionisíaco nietzschiano para um pensamento sem sujeitoDeleuze. Nietzsche. Dionysian. Thought.Deleuze. Nietzsche. Dionisíaco. Pensamento.The aim of this article is to highlight and discuss two moments in which Deleuze appropriates the Nietzschean notion of Dionysian, to compose the program of a thought without image in opposition to the thought of representation.The first appropriation concerns the question of a new philosophical discourse in favor of individuations and singularities prior to the “subject form”. The second appropriation corresponds to the defense of an immanent thought, which occurs on the surface and does not resort to well-centered models. It is about verifying at which points Nietzsche's influence was decisive for Deleuze to compose a new thought in Difference and Repetition, highlighting the notions of individuation, singularity, difference and art.O objetivo deste artigo é destacar e discutir dois momentos nos quais Deleuze se apropria da noção nietzschiana de dionisíaco, para compor o programa de um pensamento sem imagem em oposição ao pensamento da representação. A primeira apropriação diz respeito à questão de um novo discurso filosófico em prol de individuações e singularidades anteriores à “forma sujeito”. A segunda apropriação corresponde à defesa de um pensamento imanente, que ocorre na superfície e não recorre a modelos bem centrados. Trata-se de verificar em quais pontos a influência de Nietzsche foi decisiva para Deleuze compor um novo pensamento em Diferença e repetição, conferindo destaque a noções de individuação, singularidade, diferença e arte.  Universidade Federal do Ceará2023-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/8058410.36517/Argumentos.29.18Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 29 (2023); 218-227Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 29 (2023); 218-227Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 29 (2023); 218-2271984-42551984-4247reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/80584/227392Copyright (c) 2022 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLelis Matos, Leandro2023-01-01T19:10:36Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/80584Revistahttp://www.filosofia.ufc.br/argumentosPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/oaiargumentos@ufc.br||1984-42551984-4247opendoar:2023-01-01T19:10:36Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Deleuze and two appropriations of the nietzschean dionysian for a thought without a subject
Deleuze e duas apropriações do dionisíaco nietzschiano para um pensamento sem sujeito
title Deleuze and two appropriations of the nietzschean dionysian for a thought without a subject
spellingShingle Deleuze and two appropriations of the nietzschean dionysian for a thought without a subject
Lelis Matos, Leandro
Deleuze. Nietzsche. Dionysian. Thought.
Deleuze. Nietzsche. Dionisíaco. Pensamento.
title_short Deleuze and two appropriations of the nietzschean dionysian for a thought without a subject
title_full Deleuze and two appropriations of the nietzschean dionysian for a thought without a subject
title_fullStr Deleuze and two appropriations of the nietzschean dionysian for a thought without a subject
title_full_unstemmed Deleuze and two appropriations of the nietzschean dionysian for a thought without a subject
title_sort Deleuze and two appropriations of the nietzschean dionysian for a thought without a subject
author Lelis Matos, Leandro
author_facet Lelis Matos, Leandro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lelis Matos, Leandro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Deleuze. Nietzsche. Dionysian. Thought.
Deleuze. Nietzsche. Dionisíaco. Pensamento.
topic Deleuze. Nietzsche. Dionysian. Thought.
Deleuze. Nietzsche. Dionisíaco. Pensamento.
description The aim of this article is to highlight and discuss two moments in which Deleuze appropriates the Nietzschean notion of Dionysian, to compose the program of a thought without image in opposition to the thought of representation.The first appropriation concerns the question of a new philosophical discourse in favor of individuations and singularities prior to the “subject form”. The second appropriation corresponds to the defense of an immanent thought, which occurs on the surface and does not resort to well-centered models. It is about verifying at which points Nietzsche's influence was decisive for Deleuze to compose a new thought in Difference and Repetition, highlighting the notions of individuation, singularity, difference and art.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/80584
10.36517/Argumentos.29.18
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/80584
identifier_str_mv 10.36517/Argumentos.29.18
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/argumentos/article/view/80584/227392
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; No 29 (2023); 218-227
Argumentos - Periódico de Filosofia; Núm. 29 (2023); 218-227
Argumentos - Revista de Filosofia; n. 29 (2023); 218-227
1984-4255
1984-4247
reponame:Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
collection Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumentos : Revista de Filosofia (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv argumentos@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797068847348449280

Registros relacionados