Judge’s at the Supreme Court Agenda: Brazilian Judges’ Association performance at the Concentrated Judicial Review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tormen Fornara, Matheus
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Zaidan de Carvalho, Alexandre Douglas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Ciências Sociais
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/31127
Resumo: Brazilian Judges’ Association is a central political actor in the defense of the rights, prerogatives and benefits of the judicial corporation in the Brazilian Supreme Court. So, the research that underlies this paper analyzed 93 Supreme Court decisions in actions filed by the AMB between 1988 and 2017, in order to understand how the AMB has used its legitimacy to provoke concentrated judicial review. The result offers a diagnosis of the use of concentrated control from the identification of conflicts between the judiciary, other spheres of state power and other legal careers. In addition to mapping the main themes of decisions the text presents an evaluation of the standard of decision adopted on issues such as judicial organization, remuneration policy and judicial Independence. The article also raises hypotheses about the STF's judicial behavior when it is in the defense of the corporate interests of other members of the Judiciary.
id UFC-6_a0efa7cdf8aaa61d6345815d00649b9d
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/31127
network_acronym_str UFC-6
network_name_str Revista de Ciências Sociais
repository_id_str
spelling Judge’s at the Supreme Court Agenda: Brazilian Judges’ Association performance at the Concentrated Judicial ReviewOs Juízes na Pauta do Supremo: a Atuação da Associação dos Magistrados Brasileiros no Controle Concentrado de ConstitucionalidadeConcentrated Judicial ReviewJudicial PowerMagistracyBrazilian Judges’ AssociationCorporatismControle Concentrado de ConstitucionalidadePoder JudiciárioMagistraturaAssociação dos Magistrados BrasileirosCorporativismoBrazilian Judges’ Association is a central political actor in the defense of the rights, prerogatives and benefits of the judicial corporation in the Brazilian Supreme Court. So, the research that underlies this paper analyzed 93 Supreme Court decisions in actions filed by the AMB between 1988 and 2017, in order to understand how the AMB has used its legitimacy to provoke concentrated judicial review. The result offers a diagnosis of the use of concentrated control from the identification of conflicts between the judiciary, other spheres of state power and other legal careers. In addition to mapping the main themes of decisions the text presents an evaluation of the standard of decision adopted on issues such as judicial organization, remuneration policy and judicial Independence. The article also raises hypotheses about the STF's judicial behavior when it is in the defense of the corporate interests of other members of the Judiciary.Enquanto ator político central da defesa dos interesses da magistratura nacional, a Associação dos Magistrados Brasileiros tem ocupado papel protagonista na construção do discurso sobre os direitos, prerrogativas e benefícios da corporação judicial na jurisprudência do Supremo Tribunal Federal. Com o objetivo de compreender como tem sido utilizada a legitimidade da AMB para provocar o controle concentrado de constitucionalidade, a pesquisa que subjaz este artigo analisou 93 acórdãos do STF em ações movidas pela AMB entre 1988 e 2017. O resultado oferece um diagnóstico da utilização do controle concentrado em defesa da magistratura pela associação, a partir da identificação dos conflitos entre a magistratura, as demais esferas de poder do Estado e outras carreiras jurídicas. Além do mapeamento dos principais temas das decisões, que se refletem nos debates sobre organização judiciária, política remuneratória e independência judicial, o texto apresenta uma avaliação do padrão de decisão adotado em tais casos, levantando hipóteses sobre o comportamento judicial do STF quando em pauta a defesa dos interesses corporativos dos demais membros do Poder JudiciárioUniversidade Federal do Ceará2018-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/31127Revista de Ciências Sociais (Social Sciences' Journal); Vol. 49 No. 2_Jul/Out (2018): STF, Poder Judiciário e Política; 245-296Revista de Ciências Sociais (Revista de Ciencias Sociales); Vol. 49 Núm. 2_Jul/Out (2018): STF, Poder Judiciário e Política; 245-296Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 49 n. 2_Jul/Out (2018): STF, Poder Judiciário e Política; 245-2962318-46200041-8862reponame:Revista de Ciências Sociaisinstname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/31127/73059http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/31127/98103http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/31127/98104Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Sociaisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTormen Fornara, MatheusZaidan de Carvalho, Alexandre Douglas2019-01-15T20:32:39Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/31127Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/revciensoPUBhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/index.php/revcienso/oai||rcs.ufc@gmail.com|| cunhafilho@ufc.br2318-46200041-8862opendoar:2019-01-15T20:32:39Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Judge’s at the Supreme Court Agenda: Brazilian Judges’ Association performance at the Concentrated Judicial Review
Os Juízes na Pauta do Supremo: a Atuação da Associação dos Magistrados Brasileiros no Controle Concentrado de Constitucionalidade
title Judge’s at the Supreme Court Agenda: Brazilian Judges’ Association performance at the Concentrated Judicial Review
spellingShingle Judge’s at the Supreme Court Agenda: Brazilian Judges’ Association performance at the Concentrated Judicial Review
Tormen Fornara, Matheus
Concentrated Judicial Review
Judicial Power
Magistracy
Brazilian Judges’ Association
Corporatism
Controle Concentrado de Constitucionalidade
Poder Judiciário
Magistratura
Associação dos Magistrados Brasileiros
Corporativismo
title_short Judge’s at the Supreme Court Agenda: Brazilian Judges’ Association performance at the Concentrated Judicial Review
title_full Judge’s at the Supreme Court Agenda: Brazilian Judges’ Association performance at the Concentrated Judicial Review
title_fullStr Judge’s at the Supreme Court Agenda: Brazilian Judges’ Association performance at the Concentrated Judicial Review
title_full_unstemmed Judge’s at the Supreme Court Agenda: Brazilian Judges’ Association performance at the Concentrated Judicial Review
title_sort Judge’s at the Supreme Court Agenda: Brazilian Judges’ Association performance at the Concentrated Judicial Review
author Tormen Fornara, Matheus
author_facet Tormen Fornara, Matheus
Zaidan de Carvalho, Alexandre Douglas
author_role author
author2 Zaidan de Carvalho, Alexandre Douglas
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tormen Fornara, Matheus
Zaidan de Carvalho, Alexandre Douglas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Concentrated Judicial Review
Judicial Power
Magistracy
Brazilian Judges’ Association
Corporatism
Controle Concentrado de Constitucionalidade
Poder Judiciário
Magistratura
Associação dos Magistrados Brasileiros
Corporativismo
topic Concentrated Judicial Review
Judicial Power
Magistracy
Brazilian Judges’ Association
Corporatism
Controle Concentrado de Constitucionalidade
Poder Judiciário
Magistratura
Associação dos Magistrados Brasileiros
Corporativismo
description Brazilian Judges’ Association is a central political actor in the defense of the rights, prerogatives and benefits of the judicial corporation in the Brazilian Supreme Court. So, the research that underlies this paper analyzed 93 Supreme Court decisions in actions filed by the AMB between 1988 and 2017, in order to understand how the AMB has used its legitimacy to provoke concentrated judicial review. The result offers a diagnosis of the use of concentrated control from the identification of conflicts between the judiciary, other spheres of state power and other legal careers. In addition to mapping the main themes of decisions the text presents an evaluation of the standard of decision adopted on issues such as judicial organization, remuneration policy and judicial Independence. The article also raises hypotheses about the STF's judicial behavior when it is in the defense of the corporate interests of other members of the Judiciary.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/31127
url http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/31127
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/31127/73059
http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/31127/98103
http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/31127/98104
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Sociais
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Sociais
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Sociais (Social Sciences' Journal); Vol. 49 No. 2_Jul/Out (2018): STF, Poder Judiciário e Política; 245-296
Revista de Ciências Sociais (Revista de Ciencias Sociales); Vol. 49 Núm. 2_Jul/Out (2018): STF, Poder Judiciário e Política; 245-296
Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 49 n. 2_Jul/Out (2018): STF, Poder Judiciário e Política; 245-296
2318-4620
0041-8862
reponame:Revista de Ciências Sociais
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Revista de Ciências Sociais
collection Revista de Ciências Sociais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rcs.ufc@gmail.com|| cunhafilho@ufc.br
_version_ 1799698947456892928

Registros relacionados