Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Colares, Regina Cláudia Ramos
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Neri, Jiovanne Rabelo, Souza, André Mattos Brito de, Pontes, Karina Matthes de Freitas, Mendonça, Juliano Sartori, Santiago, Sérgio Lima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6397
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of ceramic surface treatments and silane drying temperature on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a resin composite to a lithium disilicate ceramic. Twenty blocks (7x7x5 mm) of lithium disilicate-based hotpressed ceramic were fabricated and randomly divided into 4 groups: G1: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with room-temperature air; G2: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G3: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G4: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with air at room-temperature. After treatments, an adhesive system (Single Bond 2) was applied, light-cured and direct restorations were built up with a resin composite (Filtek Z250). Each specimen was stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and cut into ceramic-composite beams with 1 mm2 of cross-sectional area for μTBS testing. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Student- Newman-Keuls test (α=0.05). μTBS means (S.D.) in MPa were: G1: 32.14 (7.98), G2: 35.00 (7.77) and G3: 18.36 (6.17). All specimens of G4 failed during the cutting. G1 and G2 presented significantly higher μTBS than G3 (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 (p>0.05). As far as the bond strength is concerned, surface pretreatment of lithium-disilicate ceramic with hydrofluoric acid and silane application can be used as an alternative to repair ceramic restorations with composite resin, while surface pretreatment with sandblasting should be avoided.
id UFC-7_5f314a0d4c3a3cfb5c3f894a1e70f139
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/6397
network_acronym_str UFC-7
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resinÁcido FluorídricoLítioThe aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of ceramic surface treatments and silane drying temperature on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a resin composite to a lithium disilicate ceramic. Twenty blocks (7x7x5 mm) of lithium disilicate-based hotpressed ceramic were fabricated and randomly divided into 4 groups: G1: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with room-temperature air; G2: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G3: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G4: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with air at room-temperature. After treatments, an adhesive system (Single Bond 2) was applied, light-cured and direct restorations were built up with a resin composite (Filtek Z250). Each specimen was stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and cut into ceramic-composite beams with 1 mm2 of cross-sectional area for μTBS testing. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Student- Newman-Keuls test (α=0.05). μTBS means (S.D.) in MPa were: G1: 32.14 (7.98), G2: 35.00 (7.77) and G3: 18.36 (6.17). All specimens of G4 failed during the cutting. G1 and G2 presented significantly higher μTBS than G3 (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 (p>0.05). As far as the bond strength is concerned, surface pretreatment of lithium-disilicate ceramic with hydrofluoric acid and silane application can be used as an alternative to repair ceramic restorations with composite resin, while surface pretreatment with sandblasting should be avoided.Brazilian Dental Journal2013-10-25T13:56:45Z2013-10-25T13:56:45Z2013-07info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfCOLARES, R. C. R. et al. Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin. Brazilian Dental Journal, Ribeirao Preto, SP, v. 24, n. 4, p. 349-352, jul. 2013.0103-6440http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6397Colares, Regina Cláudia RamosNeri, Jiovanne RabeloSouza, André Mattos Brito dePontes, Karina Matthes de FreitasMendonça, Juliano SartoriSantiago, Sérgio Limaengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-01-31T16:20:25Zoai:repositorio.ufc.br:riufc/6397Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/ri-oai/requestbu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.bropendoar:2024-09-11T18:19:47.557567Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin
title Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin
spellingShingle Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin
Colares, Regina Cláudia Ramos
Ácido Fluorídrico
Lítio
title_short Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin
title_full Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin
title_fullStr Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin
title_full_unstemmed Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin
title_sort Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin
author Colares, Regina Cláudia Ramos
author_facet Colares, Regina Cláudia Ramos
Neri, Jiovanne Rabelo
Souza, André Mattos Brito de
Pontes, Karina Matthes de Freitas
Mendonça, Juliano Sartori
Santiago, Sérgio Lima
author_role author
author2 Neri, Jiovanne Rabelo
Souza, André Mattos Brito de
Pontes, Karina Matthes de Freitas
Mendonça, Juliano Sartori
Santiago, Sérgio Lima
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Colares, Regina Cláudia Ramos
Neri, Jiovanne Rabelo
Souza, André Mattos Brito de
Pontes, Karina Matthes de Freitas
Mendonça, Juliano Sartori
Santiago, Sérgio Lima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ácido Fluorídrico
Lítio
topic Ácido Fluorídrico
Lítio
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of ceramic surface treatments and silane drying temperature on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a resin composite to a lithium disilicate ceramic. Twenty blocks (7x7x5 mm) of lithium disilicate-based hotpressed ceramic were fabricated and randomly divided into 4 groups: G1: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with room-temperature air; G2: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G3: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G4: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with air at room-temperature. After treatments, an adhesive system (Single Bond 2) was applied, light-cured and direct restorations were built up with a resin composite (Filtek Z250). Each specimen was stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and cut into ceramic-composite beams with 1 mm2 of cross-sectional area for μTBS testing. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Student- Newman-Keuls test (α=0.05). μTBS means (S.D.) in MPa were: G1: 32.14 (7.98), G2: 35.00 (7.77) and G3: 18.36 (6.17). All specimens of G4 failed during the cutting. G1 and G2 presented significantly higher μTBS than G3 (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 (p>0.05). As far as the bond strength is concerned, surface pretreatment of lithium-disilicate ceramic with hydrofluoric acid and silane application can be used as an alternative to repair ceramic restorations with composite resin, while surface pretreatment with sandblasting should be avoided.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-10-25T13:56:45Z
2013-10-25T13:56:45Z
2013-07
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv COLARES, R. C. R. et al. Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin. Brazilian Dental Journal, Ribeirao Preto, SP, v. 24, n. 4, p. 349-352, jul. 2013.
0103-6440
http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6397
identifier_str_mv COLARES, R. C. R. et al. Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin. Brazilian Dental Journal, Ribeirao Preto, SP, v. 24, n. 4, p. 349-352, jul. 2013.
0103-6440
url http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/6397
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bu@ufc.br || repositorio@ufc.br
_version_ 1813028757373452288