Análise dialógica da argumentação polêmica: uma hipótese geral

• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Lucas Nascimento
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
• Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/46342
• topic: Dialogismo (Análise literária); Argumentação; Polêmica religiosa

Everything acquires meaning to the human being around “a concrete center of values that is thought, seen, loved” (BAKHTIN, 2010, 124). It is from this center of love that man acts responsibly in relation to the other, so that the understanding of polemic dialogism must have this in focus when aiming at a polemizing subject. Thus, it is reasonable to say that the act of warring polemically presupposes a reaction to a beloved value that is threatened by an opposite value, since, by a value one hates to threaten what one loves. In the perspective of a dialogical analysis of the argumentation, a result of the meeting between Bakhtin and Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca, proposed in my doctoral work, I bring theoretical reflection, and discuss the foundations of the hypothesis that the polemic is a veiled hatred of loved ones on the other hand, it is argued above all by polarization, whose particular characteristics are delineated in the concrete argumentative process. From this hypothesis others are outlined and tested, serving as analytical devices for the understanding of religious-afective polemic around the discussion of the Anti-Homophobia Bill in the Federal Senate of Braz.