The narrative organization of political meaning: causality and metaphorical-metonymic institution in opinion articles
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Entrepalavras |
Texto Completo: | http://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/2022 |
Resumo: | In the moment of political polarization, above all, different narratives are produced with the intention of explaining the same phenomenon. This is due to the very character of politics as a dispute for power, since the establishment of the truth of facts is also a matter of dispute over the hegemony of meaning. Narrative has, in this perspective, an almost magical role in the construction of meanings through discourse. Motta (2013) considers, in the wake of Bruner (1998), the narrative as the canon organizer of reality and, therefore, it is possible to speak of a cognitive function proper to the narrativity. This article establishes a dialogue between discourse analysis, argumentation and cognition, through the analysis of excerpts sections of two journalistic articles of opinion in which one can perceive, through narrativity, the occurrence of two discursive processes, that of causality and the metaphorical-metonymic one, both integrated to condense, at the end of the text, specific and determined meanings. |
id |
UFC-9_bc0483aa3c354ad9db94d14fdcbbd847 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.localhost:article/2022 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-9 |
network_name_str |
Entrepalavras |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The narrative organization of political meaning: causality and metaphorical-metonymic institution in opinion articlesA organização narrativa do sentido político: causalidade e instituição metafórico-metonímica em textos de opiniãoDiscourse. Opinion. Narrative.Discurso. Opinião. Narrativa.In the moment of political polarization, above all, different narratives are produced with the intention of explaining the same phenomenon. This is due to the very character of politics as a dispute for power, since the establishment of the truth of facts is also a matter of dispute over the hegemony of meaning. Narrative has, in this perspective, an almost magical role in the construction of meanings through discourse. Motta (2013) considers, in the wake of Bruner (1998), the narrative as the canon organizer of reality and, therefore, it is possible to speak of a cognitive function proper to the narrativity. This article establishes a dialogue between discourse analysis, argumentation and cognition, through the analysis of excerpts sections of two journalistic articles of opinion in which one can perceive, through narrativity, the occurrence of two discursive processes, that of causality and the metaphorical-metonymic one, both integrated to condense, at the end of the text, specific and determined meanings.Em momento de polarização política, sobretudo, distintas narrativas são produzidas com o intuito de explicarem um mesmo fenômeno. Isso se dá pelo próprio caráter da política, enquanto disputa pelo poder, posto que o estabelecimento da verdade dos fatos é também uma questão de disputa pela hegemonia do sentido. A narrativa tem, nessa perspectiva, papel quase mágico na construção de sentidos por meio do discurso. Motta (2013) considera, na esteira de Bruner (1998), a narrativa como o cânon organizador de realidade e, portanto, é possível falar de uma função cognitiva própria à narratividade. Este artigo estabelece um diálogo entre análise do discurso, argumentação e cognição, por meio da análise de trechos de dois artigos jornalísticos de opinião em que se pode perceber, através da narratividade, a ocorrência de dois processos discursivos, o da causalidade e o metafórico-metonímico, ambos integrados para condensar, ao final do texto, sentidos específicos e determinados.Universidade Federal do CearáSeixas, Rodrigo2021-04-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/202210.22168/2237-6321-12022Entrepalavras; v. 11, n. 1 (11)Entrepalavras; v. 11, n. 1 (11)Entrepalavras; v. 11, n. 1 (11)Entrepalavras; v. 11, n. 1 (11)Entrepalavras; v. 11, n. 1 (11)2237-6321reponame:Entrepalavrasinstname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/2022/782Direitos autorais 2021 Entrepalavrasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-03-26T00:01:19Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/2022Revistahttp://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/indexPUBhttp://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/oaiwebmaster@entrepalavras.ufc.br||editor@entrepalavras.ufc.br2237-63212237-6321opendoar:2022-03-26T00:01:19Entrepalavras - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The narrative organization of political meaning: causality and metaphorical-metonymic institution in opinion articles A organização narrativa do sentido político: causalidade e instituição metafórico-metonímica em textos de opinião |
title |
The narrative organization of political meaning: causality and metaphorical-metonymic institution in opinion articles |
spellingShingle |
The narrative organization of political meaning: causality and metaphorical-metonymic institution in opinion articles Seixas, Rodrigo Discourse. Opinion. Narrative. Discurso. Opinião. Narrativa. |
title_short |
The narrative organization of political meaning: causality and metaphorical-metonymic institution in opinion articles |
title_full |
The narrative organization of political meaning: causality and metaphorical-metonymic institution in opinion articles |
title_fullStr |
The narrative organization of political meaning: causality and metaphorical-metonymic institution in opinion articles |
title_full_unstemmed |
The narrative organization of political meaning: causality and metaphorical-metonymic institution in opinion articles |
title_sort |
The narrative organization of political meaning: causality and metaphorical-metonymic institution in opinion articles |
author |
Seixas, Rodrigo |
author_facet |
Seixas, Rodrigo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Seixas, Rodrigo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Discourse. Opinion. Narrative. Discurso. Opinião. Narrativa. |
topic |
Discourse. Opinion. Narrative. Discurso. Opinião. Narrativa. |
description |
In the moment of political polarization, above all, different narratives are produced with the intention of explaining the same phenomenon. This is due to the very character of politics as a dispute for power, since the establishment of the truth of facts is also a matter of dispute over the hegemony of meaning. Narrative has, in this perspective, an almost magical role in the construction of meanings through discourse. Motta (2013) considers, in the wake of Bruner (1998), the narrative as the canon organizer of reality and, therefore, it is possible to speak of a cognitive function proper to the narrativity. This article establishes a dialogue between discourse analysis, argumentation and cognition, through the analysis of excerpts sections of two journalistic articles of opinion in which one can perceive, through narrativity, the occurrence of two discursive processes, that of causality and the metaphorical-metonymic one, both integrated to condense, at the end of the text, specific and determined meanings. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-27 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/2022 10.22168/2237-6321-12022 |
url |
http://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/2022 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22168/2237-6321-12022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.entrepalavras.ufc.br/revista/index.php/Revista/article/view/2022/782 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2021 Entrepalavras info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2021 Entrepalavras |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Ceará |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Entrepalavras; v. 11, n. 1 (11) Entrepalavras; v. 11, n. 1 (11) Entrepalavras; v. 11, n. 1 (11) Entrepalavras; v. 11, n. 1 (11) Entrepalavras; v. 11, n. 1 (11) 2237-6321 reponame:Entrepalavras instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Entrepalavras |
collection |
Entrepalavras |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Entrepalavras - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
webmaster@entrepalavras.ufc.br||editor@entrepalavras.ufc.br |
_version_ |
1798329730538143744 |