Comparison of equipment for grain sampling

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Quirino,José R.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Resende,Osvaldo, Fonseca,Natalia N., Oliveira,Daniel E. C. de, Rosa,Elivânio S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662019000300209
Resumo: ABSTRACT Grain sampling requires the use of appropriate and accurate equipment. This study aimed to compare grain samplers, manual and mechanical, used in the sampling of soybean loads, during their reception by storage units. The used devices were the manual sampler with 1.80 m length and three opening stages, 2.10 m length and three opening stages; and 2.10 m length and one opening stage, besides the mechanical sampler (pneumatic) and the pelican sampler. The analyzed parameters were the contents of impurity, broken grains, pods, immature grains, and moisture. The significance of effect of treatment was determined by F Test and the means were compared by Tukey test (p < 0.05). The devices used for sampling of soybean grains in vehicles, during their reception by storage units, affect the determination of broken grains, pods and immature grains. However, there was no difference between the types of sampling equipment in the determination of impurity content, and the pelican sampler collected greater percentages of pods and immature grains from the sampled vehicles.
id UFCG-1_1684b6b15ef53c366a8a51334b9a0dfb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1415-43662019000300209
network_acronym_str UFCG-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of equipment for grain samplingclassificationgrain samplersimpuritiespodsABSTRACT Grain sampling requires the use of appropriate and accurate equipment. This study aimed to compare grain samplers, manual and mechanical, used in the sampling of soybean loads, during their reception by storage units. The used devices were the manual sampler with 1.80 m length and three opening stages, 2.10 m length and three opening stages; and 2.10 m length and one opening stage, besides the mechanical sampler (pneumatic) and the pelican sampler. The analyzed parameters were the contents of impurity, broken grains, pods, immature grains, and moisture. The significance of effect of treatment was determined by F Test and the means were compared by Tukey test (p < 0.05). The devices used for sampling of soybean grains in vehicles, during their reception by storage units, affect the determination of broken grains, pods and immature grains. However, there was no difference between the types of sampling equipment in the determination of impurity content, and the pelican sampler collected greater percentages of pods and immature grains from the sampled vehicles.Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662019000300209Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.23 n.3 2019reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)instacron:UFCG10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n3p209-214info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQuirino,José R.Resende,OsvaldoFonseca,Natalia N.Oliveira,Daniel E. C. deRosa,Elivânio S.eng2019-03-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-43662019000300209Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbeaaPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||agriambi@agriambi.com.br1807-19291415-4366opendoar:2019-03-07T00:00Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of equipment for grain sampling
title Comparison of equipment for grain sampling
spellingShingle Comparison of equipment for grain sampling
Quirino,José R.
classification
grain samplers
impurities
pods
title_short Comparison of equipment for grain sampling
title_full Comparison of equipment for grain sampling
title_fullStr Comparison of equipment for grain sampling
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of equipment for grain sampling
title_sort Comparison of equipment for grain sampling
author Quirino,José R.
author_facet Quirino,José R.
Resende,Osvaldo
Fonseca,Natalia N.
Oliveira,Daniel E. C. de
Rosa,Elivânio S.
author_role author
author2 Resende,Osvaldo
Fonseca,Natalia N.
Oliveira,Daniel E. C. de
Rosa,Elivânio S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Quirino,José R.
Resende,Osvaldo
Fonseca,Natalia N.
Oliveira,Daniel E. C. de
Rosa,Elivânio S.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv classification
grain samplers
impurities
pods
topic classification
grain samplers
impurities
pods
description ABSTRACT Grain sampling requires the use of appropriate and accurate equipment. This study aimed to compare grain samplers, manual and mechanical, used in the sampling of soybean loads, during their reception by storage units. The used devices were the manual sampler with 1.80 m length and three opening stages, 2.10 m length and three opening stages; and 2.10 m length and one opening stage, besides the mechanical sampler (pneumatic) and the pelican sampler. The analyzed parameters were the contents of impurity, broken grains, pods, immature grains, and moisture. The significance of effect of treatment was determined by F Test and the means were compared by Tukey test (p < 0.05). The devices used for sampling of soybean grains in vehicles, during their reception by storage units, affect the determination of broken grains, pods and immature grains. However, there was no difference between the types of sampling equipment in the determination of impurity content, and the pelican sampler collected greater percentages of pods and immature grains from the sampled vehicles.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662019000300209
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662019000300209
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v23n3p209-214
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.23 n.3 2019
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
instacron:UFCG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
instacron_str UFCG
institution UFCG
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||agriambi@agriambi.com.br
_version_ 1750297686531112960