Weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sampaio,Homero N.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Silva,Paulo S. L. e, Monteiro,Alex L., Tavella,Leonardo B., Oliveira,Vianney R. de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662015000600541
Resumo: ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia ('sabiá'). A randomized block design that consisted of split plots and five replicates was used. The hybrids AG1051 and BR205 (plots) received the following treatments: A = hoeing [20 and 40 days after sowing the maize (DASM) and without intercropping]; B = hoeing 20 DASM followed by the planting of 'sabiá'; C = planting of 'sabiá' at the time the maize was sown followed by hoeing 40 DASM; D = planting of 'sabiá' at the time the maize was sown; and E = no hoeing and without intercropping. Lesser weed growth in the plots of two hybrids was observed with the treatments that involved hoeing. The highest yields for maize were obtained with two hoeings. The combinations of hoeing and intercropping provided higher grain yield compared to only intercropping with sabiá. Grain yield with hoeing 20 DASM and intercropping with sabiá was higher compared to intercropping with sabiá and hoeing 40 DASM.
id UFCG-1_aa306ba845fec953f3ca1e49ff2051ce
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1415-43662015000600541
network_acronym_str UFCG-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifoliaZea maysintegrated weed managementyield componentsABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia ('sabiá'). A randomized block design that consisted of split plots and five replicates was used. The hybrids AG1051 and BR205 (plots) received the following treatments: A = hoeing [20 and 40 days after sowing the maize (DASM) and without intercropping]; B = hoeing 20 DASM followed by the planting of 'sabiá'; C = planting of 'sabiá' at the time the maize was sown followed by hoeing 40 DASM; D = planting of 'sabiá' at the time the maize was sown; and E = no hoeing and without intercropping. Lesser weed growth in the plots of two hybrids was observed with the treatments that involved hoeing. The highest yields for maize were obtained with two hoeings. The combinations of hoeing and intercropping provided higher grain yield compared to only intercropping with sabiá. Grain yield with hoeing 20 DASM and intercropping with sabiá was higher compared to intercropping with sabiá and hoeing 40 DASM.Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662015000600541Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.19 n.6 2015reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)instacron:UFCG10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n6p541-547info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSampaio,Homero N.Silva,Paulo S. L. eMonteiro,Alex L.Tavella,Leonardo B.Oliveira,Vianney R. deeng2015-07-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1415-43662015000600541Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rbeaaPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||agriambi@agriambi.com.br1807-19291415-4366opendoar:2015-07-31T00:00Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia
title Weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia
spellingShingle Weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia
Sampaio,Homero N.
Zea mays
integrated weed management
yield components
title_short Weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia
title_full Weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia
title_fullStr Weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia
title_full_unstemmed Weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia
title_sort Weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia
author Sampaio,Homero N.
author_facet Sampaio,Homero N.
Silva,Paulo S. L. e
Monteiro,Alex L.
Tavella,Leonardo B.
Oliveira,Vianney R. de
author_role author
author2 Silva,Paulo S. L. e
Monteiro,Alex L.
Tavella,Leonardo B.
Oliveira,Vianney R. de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sampaio,Homero N.
Silva,Paulo S. L. e
Monteiro,Alex L.
Tavella,Leonardo B.
Oliveira,Vianney R. de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zea mays
integrated weed management
yield components
topic Zea mays
integrated weed management
yield components
description ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the weed management in maize using hoeing and intercropping with Mimosa caesalpiniifolia ('sabiá'). A randomized block design that consisted of split plots and five replicates was used. The hybrids AG1051 and BR205 (plots) received the following treatments: A = hoeing [20 and 40 days after sowing the maize (DASM) and without intercropping]; B = hoeing 20 DASM followed by the planting of 'sabiá'; C = planting of 'sabiá' at the time the maize was sown followed by hoeing 40 DASM; D = planting of 'sabiá' at the time the maize was sown; and E = no hoeing and without intercropping. Lesser weed growth in the plots of two hybrids was observed with the treatments that involved hoeing. The highest yields for maize were obtained with two hoeings. The combinations of hoeing and intercropping provided higher grain yield compared to only intercropping with sabiá. Grain yield with hoeing 20 DASM and intercropping with sabiá was higher compared to intercropping with sabiá and hoeing 40 DASM.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662015000600541
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-43662015000600541
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n6p541-547
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental v.19 n.6 2015
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
instacron:UFCG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
instacron_str UFCG
institution UFCG
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental (Online) - Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||agriambi@agriambi.com.br
_version_ 1750297683719880704