"Esse caso à de NASF?â: compreendendo prÃticas de saÃde mental na atenÃÃo primÃria em Fortaleza-CE.

• Autor(a) principal: Pedro Renan Santos de Oliveira
• Data de Publicação: 2013
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
• Texto Completo: http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=10058
• topic: AtenÃÃo PrimÃria à SaÃde; Programa SaÃde da FamÃlia; SaÃde Mental; Reforma PsiquiÃtrica; PrÃtica Profissional; Primary Health Care; Family health program; Metal Health; Psychiatric Reform; Professional Practice; SAUDE COLETIVA

The Support Nuclei for Family Health (SNFH) born within the Primary Health Care (PHC), as a resolution attempt, especially towards the issues that relate to the integrality of care and the broadening of the scope of actions of the Family Health Strategy (FHS). The Mental Health (MH) arises in SNFH by insertion of professionals from this field, since in their structuring and organizational rules, despite working in a team and be highly interdisciplinary, some professions are responsible for conducting such care lines.By critically scrolling through the route of health policy, focusing on the FHS, we think the SNFH as one of the places where the professional practice seemed strategic to the reflections that we wanted to produce in this research. Thus, we aimed to investigate the MH actions that are evident in professional practice in the SNFH at the FHS in Fortaleza, Cearà - Brazil. We used to do so within the qualitative health research, the proposal of the methodological triangulation, through Flowcharts Analyzers (FA) Focus Groups (FG) and Free Observations (FO), with the goal of combining the techniques of construction information around the research object because this gave us the opportunity to develop the research exploring different views and procedures, giving us more stability and rigor in approaching the object. Through theoretical and methodological affiliation to Hermeneutic-Dialectic, whose paradigmatic approach concerns the comprehensive critical posture, we present a construction of qualitative data in the lines of analysis, MH Practices in the PHC, Work Process in SNFH and "Unpublished" and "Viable" in SM in the FHS, which dialogued with the historical and conceptual apparatus presented in theoretical researches. The problematic created between the unpublished and the viable within the MH in SNFH meant that, given the practices developed - sometimes understood as new - performance/attention models systematized in daily life and organization of the work process in teams SNFH, interactioning with teams of reference, the viable - which "is the case" and "not the case" to the SNFH - is decided before the contextual markers of each care arrangement. Future studies may complement the results, especially regarding the need to complement the gaze of the reference teams on health practices. However, researching professional practice in mental health in the FHS, "in these SNFH cases", was an instrument to promote reflection for training new professionals, and has served to foster the attitude of (self-) criticism towards the practice, or praxis, of the current field workers, and especially a device for evaluating the quality of care, so important to advocate policies that look for differences, as the FHS, for the Unified Health System.