Avaliation of the sanitary, agronomics and final product quality aspects in watermelons irrigated with treated sewage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mayara Carantino Costa
Data de Publicação: 2006
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
Texto Completo: http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=250
Resumo: The reuse of treated sewage on watermelon irrigation, variety Crimson Sweet, was investigated not only considering the sanitary aspects but also the productivity and final product quality. The experiment was conducted in the Research Centre on Wastewater Treatment and Reuse, owned by the Company of Water and Wastewater of CearÃ, in Aquiraz-CE. The experimental delimitation was randomized blocks, with four repetitions and four treatments: raw water and soil fertilization (T1); treated wastewater and soil fertilization (T2); treated wastewater without external soil fertilization (T3); and treated wastewater and half of soil fertilization (T4). The irrigation waters used (raw water and effluent of a stabilization pond) were characterized by the physical-chemical and microbiological aspects. Both waters were in the limits normalized by the World Health Organization (WHO) for unrestricted irrigation. The irrigation methods drip and furrow were compared in verifying of which one is more suitable for effluent reuse on watermelon production. The productivity data indicated that there was no significative difference among the treatments on drip irrigation, where the biggest productivities were obtained on T1 and T2 treatments. For the furrow system, no satisfactory productivity was achieved. The study revealed a significative difference among the treatments regarding the physical-chemical characteristics of the fruits. However, the microbiological quality was never compromised. Sensorial tests revealed that only the treatment T2 (treated wastewater and soil fertilization) did not present a different flavour, significative on 5% level, compared to the treatment T1 (control), and that the irrigation systems drip and furrow could be indifferently used without compromising the product flavour.
id UFC_969395e26d2a90f86cb3d9bce420e06c
oai_identifier_str oai:www.teses.ufc.br:341
network_acronym_str UFC
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
spelling info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisAvaliation of the sanitary, agronomics and final product quality aspects in watermelons irrigated with treated sewageAvaliaÃÃo dos Aspectos SanitÃrios, Agronomicos e de Qualidade em Melancias Irrigadas com Esgoto Tratado2006-07-28Francisco SuetÃnio Bastos Mota0249432935396096160387http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.jsp?id=K4137855Y6Mayara Carantino CostaUniversidade Federal do CearÃPrograma de PÃs-GraduaÃÃo em Engenharia CivilUFCBRReuso, Esgoto tratado, Irrigacao, Cultura da melanciaReuse, Treated Sewage, Irrigation, WatermelonSANEAMENTO AMBIENTALThe reuse of treated sewage on watermelon irrigation, variety Crimson Sweet, was investigated not only considering the sanitary aspects but also the productivity and final product quality. The experiment was conducted in the Research Centre on Wastewater Treatment and Reuse, owned by the Company of Water and Wastewater of CearÃ, in Aquiraz-CE. The experimental delimitation was randomized blocks, with four repetitions and four treatments: raw water and soil fertilization (T1); treated wastewater and soil fertilization (T2); treated wastewater without external soil fertilization (T3); and treated wastewater and half of soil fertilization (T4). The irrigation waters used (raw water and effluent of a stabilization pond) were characterized by the physical-chemical and microbiological aspects. Both waters were in the limits normalized by the World Health Organization (WHO) for unrestricted irrigation. The irrigation methods drip and furrow were compared in verifying of which one is more suitable for effluent reuse on watermelon production. The productivity data indicated that there was no significative difference among the treatments on drip irrigation, where the biggest productivities were obtained on T1 and T2 treatments. For the furrow system, no satisfactory productivity was achieved. The study revealed a significative difference among the treatments regarding the physical-chemical characteristics of the fruits. However, the microbiological quality was never compromised. Sensorial tests revealed that only the treatment T2 (treated wastewater and soil fertilization) did not present a different flavour, significative on 5% level, compared to the treatment T1 (control), and that the irrigation systems drip and furrow could be indifferently used without compromising the product flavour.Investigou-se o reÃso de esgoto sanitÃrio tratado na irrigaÃÃo da cultura da melancia, variedade Crimson Sweet, tanto relacionado aos aspectos sanitÃrios como tambÃm à produtividade e à qualidade do produto final. O estudo foi realizado no Centro de Pesquisa sobre Tratamento de Esgoto e ReÃso de Ãguas da Companhia de Ãgua e Esgoto do Cearà em Aquiraz-CE. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetiÃÃes e quatro tratamentos: T1 - Ãgua do poÃo mais adubaÃÃo; T2 - efluente mais adubaÃÃo; T3 - efluente e T4 - efluente mais a metade da adubaÃÃo. As Ãguas de irrigaÃÃo utilizadas (Ãgua de poÃo e efluente de lagoas de estabilizaÃÃo) foram caracterizadas sob os aspectos fÃsico-quÃmicos e microbiolÃgicos, em que ambas estavam dentro dos limites estabelecidos pela OMS para irrigaÃÃo irrestrita. Os mÃtodos de irrigaÃÃo por gotejamento e sulco foram comparados para a verificaÃÃo do mais indicado para o reÃso com efluentes na cultura da melancia. Por meio de anÃlise dos dados de produtividade da cultura observou-se que nÃo houve diferenÃa significativa entre os tratamentos na irrigaÃÃo por gotejamento, sendo que os melhores resultados foram obtidos nos tratamentos T1 e T2. Para o sistema de sulco, nÃo foram obtidas produtividades satisfatÃrias. . O estudo indicou que houve diferenÃa significativa entre os tratamentos em relaÃÃo Ãs caracterÃsticas fÃsico-quÃmicas dos frutos produzidos, contudo, nÃo houve comprometimento da qualidade microbiolÃgica dos mesmos em nenhum dos tratamentos avaliados. Em relaÃÃo Ãs caracterÃsticas sensoriais observou-se, que somente as amostras que receberam o tratamento T2 (irrigaÃÃo com efluente mais adubaÃÃo) nÃo apresentaram sabor diferente, significativo ao nÃvel de 5%, quando comparadas Ãquelas submetidas ao tratamento controle (T1), e que os sistemas de irrigaÃÃo, sulco e gotejo, podem ser utilizados, indiferentemente, sem comprometer o sabor dos frutos produzidosConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento CientÃfico e TecnolÃgicohttp://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=250application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFCinstname:Universidade Federal do Cearáinstacron:UFC2019-01-21T11:13:21Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Avaliation of the sanitary, agronomics and final product quality aspects in watermelons irrigated with treated sewage
dc.title.alternative.pt.fl_str_mv AvaliaÃÃo dos Aspectos SanitÃrios, Agronomicos e de Qualidade em Melancias Irrigadas com Esgoto Tratado
title Avaliation of the sanitary, agronomics and final product quality aspects in watermelons irrigated with treated sewage
spellingShingle Avaliation of the sanitary, agronomics and final product quality aspects in watermelons irrigated with treated sewage
Mayara Carantino Costa
Reuso, Esgoto tratado, Irrigacao, Cultura da melancia
Reuse, Treated Sewage, Irrigation, Watermelon
SANEAMENTO AMBIENTAL
title_short Avaliation of the sanitary, agronomics and final product quality aspects in watermelons irrigated with treated sewage
title_full Avaliation of the sanitary, agronomics and final product quality aspects in watermelons irrigated with treated sewage
title_fullStr Avaliation of the sanitary, agronomics and final product quality aspects in watermelons irrigated with treated sewage
title_full_unstemmed Avaliation of the sanitary, agronomics and final product quality aspects in watermelons irrigated with treated sewage
title_sort Avaliation of the sanitary, agronomics and final product quality aspects in watermelons irrigated with treated sewage
author Mayara Carantino Costa
author_facet Mayara Carantino Costa
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Francisco SuetÃnio Bastos Mota
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv 02494329353
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 96096160387
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.jsp?id=K4137855Y6
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mayara Carantino Costa
contributor_str_mv Francisco SuetÃnio Bastos Mota
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reuso, Esgoto tratado, Irrigacao, Cultura da melancia
topic Reuso, Esgoto tratado, Irrigacao, Cultura da melancia
Reuse, Treated Sewage, Irrigation, Watermelon
SANEAMENTO AMBIENTAL
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Reuse, Treated Sewage, Irrigation, Watermelon
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv SANEAMENTO AMBIENTAL
dc.description.sponsorship.fl_txt_mv Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento CientÃfico e TecnolÃgico
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv The reuse of treated sewage on watermelon irrigation, variety Crimson Sweet, was investigated not only considering the sanitary aspects but also the productivity and final product quality. The experiment was conducted in the Research Centre on Wastewater Treatment and Reuse, owned by the Company of Water and Wastewater of CearÃ, in Aquiraz-CE. The experimental delimitation was randomized blocks, with four repetitions and four treatments: raw water and soil fertilization (T1); treated wastewater and soil fertilization (T2); treated wastewater without external soil fertilization (T3); and treated wastewater and half of soil fertilization (T4). The irrigation waters used (raw water and effluent of a stabilization pond) were characterized by the physical-chemical and microbiological aspects. Both waters were in the limits normalized by the World Health Organization (WHO) for unrestricted irrigation. The irrigation methods drip and furrow were compared in verifying of which one is more suitable for effluent reuse on watermelon production. The productivity data indicated that there was no significative difference among the treatments on drip irrigation, where the biggest productivities were obtained on T1 and T2 treatments. For the furrow system, no satisfactory productivity was achieved. The study revealed a significative difference among the treatments regarding the physical-chemical characteristics of the fruits. However, the microbiological quality was never compromised. Sensorial tests revealed that only the treatment T2 (treated wastewater and soil fertilization) did not present a different flavour, significative on 5% level, compared to the treatment T1 (control), and that the irrigation systems drip and furrow could be indifferently used without compromising the product flavour.
Investigou-se o reÃso de esgoto sanitÃrio tratado na irrigaÃÃo da cultura da melancia, variedade Crimson Sweet, tanto relacionado aos aspectos sanitÃrios como tambÃm à produtividade e à qualidade do produto final. O estudo foi realizado no Centro de Pesquisa sobre Tratamento de Esgoto e ReÃso de Ãguas da Companhia de Ãgua e Esgoto do Cearà em Aquiraz-CE. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos ao acaso, com quatro repetiÃÃes e quatro tratamentos: T1 - Ãgua do poÃo mais adubaÃÃo; T2 - efluente mais adubaÃÃo; T3 - efluente e T4 - efluente mais a metade da adubaÃÃo. As Ãguas de irrigaÃÃo utilizadas (Ãgua de poÃo e efluente de lagoas de estabilizaÃÃo) foram caracterizadas sob os aspectos fÃsico-quÃmicos e microbiolÃgicos, em que ambas estavam dentro dos limites estabelecidos pela OMS para irrigaÃÃo irrestrita. Os mÃtodos de irrigaÃÃo por gotejamento e sulco foram comparados para a verificaÃÃo do mais indicado para o reÃso com efluentes na cultura da melancia. Por meio de anÃlise dos dados de produtividade da cultura observou-se que nÃo houve diferenÃa significativa entre os tratamentos na irrigaÃÃo por gotejamento, sendo que os melhores resultados foram obtidos nos tratamentos T1 e T2. Para o sistema de sulco, nÃo foram obtidas produtividades satisfatÃrias. . O estudo indicou que houve diferenÃa significativa entre os tratamentos em relaÃÃo Ãs caracterÃsticas fÃsico-quÃmicas dos frutos produzidos, contudo, nÃo houve comprometimento da qualidade microbiolÃgica dos mesmos em nenhum dos tratamentos avaliados. Em relaÃÃo Ãs caracterÃsticas sensoriais observou-se, que somente as amostras que receberam o tratamento T2 (irrigaÃÃo com efluente mais adubaÃÃo) nÃo apresentaram sabor diferente, significativo ao nÃvel de 5%, quando comparadas Ãquelas submetidas ao tratamento controle (T1), e que os sistemas de irrigaÃÃo, sulco e gotejo, podem ser utilizados, indiferentemente, sem comprometer o sabor dos frutos produzidos
description The reuse of treated sewage on watermelon irrigation, variety Crimson Sweet, was investigated not only considering the sanitary aspects but also the productivity and final product quality. The experiment was conducted in the Research Centre on Wastewater Treatment and Reuse, owned by the Company of Water and Wastewater of CearÃ, in Aquiraz-CE. The experimental delimitation was randomized blocks, with four repetitions and four treatments: raw water and soil fertilization (T1); treated wastewater and soil fertilization (T2); treated wastewater without external soil fertilization (T3); and treated wastewater and half of soil fertilization (T4). The irrigation waters used (raw water and effluent of a stabilization pond) were characterized by the physical-chemical and microbiological aspects. Both waters were in the limits normalized by the World Health Organization (WHO) for unrestricted irrigation. The irrigation methods drip and furrow were compared in verifying of which one is more suitable for effluent reuse on watermelon production. The productivity data indicated that there was no significative difference among the treatments on drip irrigation, where the biggest productivities were obtained on T1 and T2 treatments. For the furrow system, no satisfactory productivity was achieved. The study revealed a significative difference among the treatments regarding the physical-chemical characteristics of the fruits. However, the microbiological quality was never compromised. Sensorial tests revealed that only the treatment T2 (treated wastewater and soil fertilization) did not present a different flavour, significative on 5% level, compared to the treatment T1 (control), and that the irrigation systems drip and furrow could be indifferently used without compromising the product flavour.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2006-07-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=250
url http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=250
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do CearÃ
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de PÃs-GraduaÃÃo em Engenharia Civil
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFC
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do CearÃ
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará
instacron:UFC
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1643295113989849088