Adjetivos adverbializados: anÃlise lÃxico-funcional e implementaÃÃo computacional

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Daniel de FranÃa Brasil Soares
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
Texto Completo: http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=20504
Resumo: In this work, we propose a computational linguistic analysis of the so-called adverbialized adjectives (hereinafter AdjAdvs). On the one hand, we start by questioning whether AdjAdvs belong to category A(djective) or ADV(erb) and, on the other, which approach is computationally more efficient. We base our point of view according to the Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) (KAPLAN and BRESNAN, 1982) and implement in the XLE system (Xerox Linguistic Environment) a fragment of Brazilian Portuguese grammar (henceforth PB) capable of analyzing adjectives in adverbial use. Our implementation is based on the adaptation of a fragment of French grammar constructed by Schwarze and Alencar (2016) and deepened in FrGramm by Alencar (2017). This fragment of grammar adapted to PB serves as the basis for the implementation of two versions for a comparative analysis: G-A and G-ADV. In the first version, AdjAdvs are analyzed as adjectival category, while in the second they are analyzed as adverbial category. The implementation of G-A and G-ADV is evaluated by applying a parser to a set of 168 grammatical sentences and 286 ungrammatical sentences. After testing grammatical and ungrammatical sentence sets, G-A and G-ADV grammars processing results in XLE and the statistical analysis based on the double factor variance test, we concluded that there was no significant difference in treatment of syntax between G-A and G-ADV versions built to parse AdjAdvs. This result reinforces Radford (1988) argument that adjectives and adverbs belong to a single category.
id UFC_c43fe45c1e5658d72f69725ecbaeb6f8
oai_identifier_str oai:www.teses.ufc.br:12890
network_acronym_str UFC
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
spelling info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisAdjetivos adverbializados: anÃlise lÃxico-funcional e implementaÃÃo computacional2018-09-00Leonel Figueiredo de Alencar Araripe3080854535395178936965Daniel de FranÃa Brasil SoaresUniversidade Federal do CearÃPrograma de PÃs-GraduaÃÃo em LingÃÃsticaUFCBRLinguÃstica Computacional AnÃlise sintÃtica automÃtica profunda GramÃticaLÃxico-Funcional LFG-XLE Adjetivos adverbializados.Computational Linguistics Deep syntactic parsing Lexical-Functional GrammarLFG-XLE Adverbialized adjectivesLINGUISTICAIn this work, we propose a computational linguistic analysis of the so-called adverbialized adjectives (hereinafter AdjAdvs). On the one hand, we start by questioning whether AdjAdvs belong to category A(djective) or ADV(erb) and, on the other, which approach is computationally more efficient. We base our point of view according to the Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) (KAPLAN and BRESNAN, 1982) and implement in the XLE system (Xerox Linguistic Environment) a fragment of Brazilian Portuguese grammar (henceforth PB) capable of analyzing adjectives in adverbial use. Our implementation is based on the adaptation of a fragment of French grammar constructed by Schwarze and Alencar (2016) and deepened in FrGramm by Alencar (2017). This fragment of grammar adapted to PB serves as the basis for the implementation of two versions for a comparative analysis: G-A and G-ADV. In the first version, AdjAdvs are analyzed as adjectival category, while in the second they are analyzed as adverbial category. The implementation of G-A and G-ADV is evaluated by applying a parser to a set of 168 grammatical sentences and 286 ungrammatical sentences. After testing grammatical and ungrammatical sentence sets, G-A and G-ADV grammars processing results in XLE and the statistical analysis based on the double factor variance test, we concluded that there was no significant difference in treatment of syntax between G-A and G-ADV versions built to parse AdjAdvs. This result reinforces Radford (1988) argument that adjectives and adverbs belong to a single category.Neste trabalho, propomos uma anÃlise linguÃstico-computacional dos chamados adjetivos adverbializados (doravante AdjAdvs). Partimos, por um lado, do questionamento se AdjAdvs pertencem à categoria A(djetivo) ou ADV(Ãrbio) e, por outro, que abordagem à computacionalmente mais eficiente. Fundamentamos nosso ponto de vista de acordo com a GramÃtica LÃxico-Funcional (LFG, em inglÃs Lexical-Functional Grammar) (cf. KAPLAN e BRESNAN, 1982) e implementamos no sistema XLE (do inglÃs Xerox Linguistic Environment) um fragmento de gramÃtica do portuguÃs brasileiro (doravante PB) capaz de analisar adjetivos em uso adverbial. Nossa implementaÃÃo parte da adaptaÃÃo de uma minigramÃtica do francÃs construÃda por Schwarze e Alencar (2016) e aprofundada na FrGramm por Alencar (2017). Esse fragmento de gramÃtica adaptado ao PB serve de base para a construÃÃo de duas versÃes para uma anÃlise comparativa: G-A e G-ADV. Na primeira versÃo, AdjAdvs sÃo analisados como categoria adjetival, enquanto na segunda sÃo analisados como categoria adverbial. A implementaÃÃo de G-A e G-ADV à avaliada pela aplicaÃÃo de um analisador sintÃtico automÃtico (parser) a 168 sentenÃas gramaticais e 286 sentenÃas agramaticais. ApÃs os testes nos conjuntos de sentenÃas gramaticais e agramaticais, os resultados de processamento das gramÃticas G-A e G-ADV no software XLE e a anÃlise estatÃstica com base no teste de variÃncia de fator duplo, chegamos à conclusÃo de que nÃo hà diferenÃa significativa no tratamento sintÃtico entre as versÃes G-A e G-ADV construÃdas para analisar AdjAdvs. Esse resultado reforÃa o argumento de Radford (1988) de que adjetivos e advÃrbios pertencem a uma Ãnica categoria.FundaÃÃo de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do CearÃhttp://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=20504application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFCinstname:Universidade Federal do Cearáinstacron:UFC2019-01-21T11:32:58Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.pt.fl_str_mv Adjetivos adverbializados: anÃlise lÃxico-funcional e implementaÃÃo computacional
title Adjetivos adverbializados: anÃlise lÃxico-funcional e implementaÃÃo computacional
spellingShingle Adjetivos adverbializados: anÃlise lÃxico-funcional e implementaÃÃo computacional
Daniel de FranÃa Brasil Soares
LinguÃstica Computacional
AnÃlise sintÃtica automÃtica profunda
GramÃticaLÃxico-Funcional
LFG-XLE
Adjetivos adverbializados.
Computational Linguistics
Deep syntactic parsing
Lexical-Functional Grammar
LFG-XLE
Adverbialized adjectives
LINGUISTICA
title_short Adjetivos adverbializados: anÃlise lÃxico-funcional e implementaÃÃo computacional
title_full Adjetivos adverbializados: anÃlise lÃxico-funcional e implementaÃÃo computacional
title_fullStr Adjetivos adverbializados: anÃlise lÃxico-funcional e implementaÃÃo computacional
title_full_unstemmed Adjetivos adverbializados: anÃlise lÃxico-funcional e implementaÃÃo computacional
title_sort Adjetivos adverbializados: anÃlise lÃxico-funcional e implementaÃÃo computacional
author Daniel de FranÃa Brasil Soares
author_facet Daniel de FranÃa Brasil Soares
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Leonel Figueiredo de Alencar Araripe
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv 30808545353
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 95178936965
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Daniel de FranÃa Brasil Soares
contributor_str_mv Leonel Figueiredo de Alencar Araripe
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv LinguÃstica Computacional
AnÃlise sintÃtica automÃtica profunda
GramÃticaLÃxico-Funcional
LFG-XLE
Adjetivos adverbializados.
topic LinguÃstica Computacional
AnÃlise sintÃtica automÃtica profunda
GramÃticaLÃxico-Funcional
LFG-XLE
Adjetivos adverbializados.
Computational Linguistics
Deep syntactic parsing
Lexical-Functional Grammar
LFG-XLE
Adverbialized adjectives
LINGUISTICA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Computational Linguistics
Deep syntactic parsing
Lexical-Functional Grammar
LFG-XLE
Adverbialized adjectives
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv LINGUISTICA
dc.description.sponsorship.fl_txt_mv FundaÃÃo de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do CearÃ
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv In this work, we propose a computational linguistic analysis of the so-called adverbialized adjectives (hereinafter AdjAdvs). On the one hand, we start by questioning whether AdjAdvs belong to category A(djective) or ADV(erb) and, on the other, which approach is computationally more efficient. We base our point of view according to the Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) (KAPLAN and BRESNAN, 1982) and implement in the XLE system (Xerox Linguistic Environment) a fragment of Brazilian Portuguese grammar (henceforth PB) capable of analyzing adjectives in adverbial use. Our implementation is based on the adaptation of a fragment of French grammar constructed by Schwarze and Alencar (2016) and deepened in FrGramm by Alencar (2017). This fragment of grammar adapted to PB serves as the basis for the implementation of two versions for a comparative analysis: G-A and G-ADV. In the first version, AdjAdvs are analyzed as adjectival category, while in the second they are analyzed as adverbial category. The implementation of G-A and G-ADV is evaluated by applying a parser to a set of 168 grammatical sentences and 286 ungrammatical sentences. After testing grammatical and ungrammatical sentence sets, G-A and G-ADV grammars processing results in XLE and the statistical analysis based on the double factor variance test, we concluded that there was no significant difference in treatment of syntax between G-A and G-ADV versions built to parse AdjAdvs. This result reinforces Radford (1988) argument that adjectives and adverbs belong to a single category.
Neste trabalho, propomos uma anÃlise linguÃstico-computacional dos chamados adjetivos adverbializados (doravante AdjAdvs). Partimos, por um lado, do questionamento se AdjAdvs pertencem à categoria A(djetivo) ou ADV(Ãrbio) e, por outro, que abordagem à computacionalmente mais eficiente. Fundamentamos nosso ponto de vista de acordo com a GramÃtica LÃxico-Funcional (LFG, em inglÃs Lexical-Functional Grammar) (cf. KAPLAN e BRESNAN, 1982) e implementamos no sistema XLE (do inglÃs Xerox Linguistic Environment) um fragmento de gramÃtica do portuguÃs brasileiro (doravante PB) capaz de analisar adjetivos em uso adverbial. Nossa implementaÃÃo parte da adaptaÃÃo de uma minigramÃtica do francÃs construÃda por Schwarze e Alencar (2016) e aprofundada na FrGramm por Alencar (2017). Esse fragmento de gramÃtica adaptado ao PB serve de base para a construÃÃo de duas versÃes para uma anÃlise comparativa: G-A e G-ADV. Na primeira versÃo, AdjAdvs sÃo analisados como categoria adjetival, enquanto na segunda sÃo analisados como categoria adverbial. A implementaÃÃo de G-A e G-ADV à avaliada pela aplicaÃÃo de um analisador sintÃtico automÃtico (parser) a 168 sentenÃas gramaticais e 286 sentenÃas agramaticais. ApÃs os testes nos conjuntos de sentenÃas gramaticais e agramaticais, os resultados de processamento das gramÃticas G-A e G-ADV no software XLE e a anÃlise estatÃstica com base no teste de variÃncia de fator duplo, chegamos à conclusÃo de que nÃo hà diferenÃa significativa no tratamento sintÃtico entre as versÃes G-A e G-ADV construÃdas para analisar AdjAdvs. Esse resultado reforÃa o argumento de Radford (1988) de que adjetivos e advÃrbios pertencem a uma Ãnica categoria.
description In this work, we propose a computational linguistic analysis of the so-called adverbialized adjectives (hereinafter AdjAdvs). On the one hand, we start by questioning whether AdjAdvs belong to category A(djective) or ADV(erb) and, on the other, which approach is computationally more efficient. We base our point of view according to the Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) (KAPLAN and BRESNAN, 1982) and implement in the XLE system (Xerox Linguistic Environment) a fragment of Brazilian Portuguese grammar (henceforth PB) capable of analyzing adjectives in adverbial use. Our implementation is based on the adaptation of a fragment of French grammar constructed by Schwarze and Alencar (2016) and deepened in FrGramm by Alencar (2017). This fragment of grammar adapted to PB serves as the basis for the implementation of two versions for a comparative analysis: G-A and G-ADV. In the first version, AdjAdvs are analyzed as adjectival category, while in the second they are analyzed as adverbial category. The implementation of G-A and G-ADV is evaluated by applying a parser to a set of 168 grammatical sentences and 286 ungrammatical sentences. After testing grammatical and ungrammatical sentence sets, G-A and G-ADV grammars processing results in XLE and the statistical analysis based on the double factor variance test, we concluded that there was no significant difference in treatment of syntax between G-A and G-ADV versions built to parse AdjAdvs. This result reinforces Radford (1988) argument that adjectives and adverbs belong to a single category.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-09-00
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=20504
url http://www.teses.ufc.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=20504
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do CearÃ
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de PÃs-GraduaÃÃo em LingÃÃstica
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFC
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do CearÃ
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará
instacron:UFC
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1643295239764443136

Registros relacionados