INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND PLANT DENSITY ON "SECOND-SEASON” MAIZE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ben, Luis Humberto Bahú
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Peiter, Marcia Xavier, Robaina, Adroaldo Dias, Parizi, Ana Rita Costenaro, Silva, Gideon Ujacov da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4790
Resumo: This study assessed the effect of different irrigation levels and plant densities on maize crops cultivated during the second season in the Western Border region of the State of Rio Grande do Sul. This work was conducted at the Federal Institute of Farroupilha – Alegrete Campus/RS – between January and June 2014. Treatments were arranged in a completely randomized 5 × 4 factorial design, with 3 replicates each. Irrigation of fixed amounts of water that were based on the evapotranspiration of the culture (Etc): 0, 50, 75, 100, and 125% of Etc were applied at 5-day intervals. Four densities of plants were defined (4, 7, 10, and 13 plants m-2). We assessed number of maize ears per plant, number of grains per ear, aboveground dry matter, mass of 100 grains, harvest index, and grain productivity. The number of grains per ear, mass of 100 grains, and grain yield were influenced by irrigation levels. Plant density and water depth influenced the number of grains per ear, the mass of 100 grains, and grain productivity. The highest yield of winter maize grain was achieved with a combination of 13 plants per m-2 and an irrigation level of 100% of Etc. Specific densities of plants maximized the yield of maize at each irrigation level, demonstrating that choice of plant density is a critical variable in the second crop of maize, and significantly influences the components of production.
id UFERSA-1_036a604b62aefa1b61d18b7e69b40fc4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/4790
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND PLANT DENSITY ON "SECOND-SEASON” MAIZEINFLUÊNCIA DE LÂMINAS DE IRRIGAÇÃO E DENSIDADE DE PLANTAS NO MILHO “SAFRINHA”Zea mays L.. Irrigation management. Yield components.Zea mays L. Manejo de irrigação. Componentes de produção.This study assessed the effect of different irrigation levels and plant densities on maize crops cultivated during the second season in the Western Border region of the State of Rio Grande do Sul. This work was conducted at the Federal Institute of Farroupilha – Alegrete Campus/RS – between January and June 2014. Treatments were arranged in a completely randomized 5 × 4 factorial design, with 3 replicates each. Irrigation of fixed amounts of water that were based on the evapotranspiration of the culture (Etc): 0, 50, 75, 100, and 125% of Etc were applied at 5-day intervals. Four densities of plants were defined (4, 7, 10, and 13 plants m-2). We assessed number of maize ears per plant, number of grains per ear, aboveground dry matter, mass of 100 grains, harvest index, and grain productivity. The number of grains per ear, mass of 100 grains, and grain yield were influenced by irrigation levels. Plant density and water depth influenced the number of grains per ear, the mass of 100 grains, and grain productivity. The highest yield of winter maize grain was achieved with a combination of 13 plants per m-2 and an irrigation level of 100% of Etc. Specific densities of plants maximized the yield of maize at each irrigation level, demonstrating that choice of plant density is a critical variable in the second crop of maize, and significantly influences the components of production.O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar o efeito de diferentes lâminas de irrigação e densidades de plantas sobre o milho safrinha na região Fronteira Oeste do Estado do RS. O trabalho foi conduzido no Instituto Federal Farroupilha – Campus de Alegrete/RS, no período de janeiro a junho de 2014. Os tratamentos foram dispostos em um delineamento Inteiramente casualizado, fatorial 5 x 4 com 3 repetições. As irrigações foram realizadas em turno de rega fixo de cinco dias e a lâmina aplicada, com base na evapotranspiração da cultura (Etc). Os tratamentos foram 0, 50, 75, 100 e 125% da Etc. Foi definido quatro densidades de plantas (4; 7; 10 e 13 plantas m-2). Avaliou-se: número de espigas por planta, número de grãos por espiga, matéria seca da parte aérea, massa de cem grãos, índice de colheita e produtividade de grãos. O número de grãos por espiga, a massa de cem grãos e a produtividade de grãos são influenciados pelas lâminas de irrigação. A densidade de plantas e a lâmina de irrigação influenciaram no número de grãos por espiga, massa seca da parte aérea e produtividade de grãos. A maior produtividade de grãos do milho safrinha foi encontrada na combinação de 13 plantas m-2 com a lâmina de irrigação de 100% da Etc. Existe uma densidade de plantas que maximiza o rendimento de grãos de milho para cada lâmina de irrigação adotada. A escolha da densidade de plantas é uma variável decisiva no cultivo de milho safrinha, influenciando significativamente nos componentes de produção.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2016-07-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/479010.1590/1983-21252016v29n317rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2016); 665-676Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 3 (2016); 665-6761983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4790/pdf_406Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBen, Luis Humberto BahúPeiter, Marcia XavierRobaina, Adroaldo DiasParizi, Ana Rita CostenaroSilva, Gideon Ujacov da2023-07-19T18:24:50Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/4790Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:18.946758Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND PLANT DENSITY ON "SECOND-SEASON” MAIZE
INFLUÊNCIA DE LÂMINAS DE IRRIGAÇÃO E DENSIDADE DE PLANTAS NO MILHO “SAFRINHA”
title INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND PLANT DENSITY ON "SECOND-SEASON” MAIZE
spellingShingle INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND PLANT DENSITY ON "SECOND-SEASON” MAIZE
Ben, Luis Humberto Bahú
Zea mays L.. Irrigation management. Yield components.
Zea mays L. Manejo de irrigação. Componentes de produção.
title_short INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND PLANT DENSITY ON "SECOND-SEASON” MAIZE
title_full INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND PLANT DENSITY ON "SECOND-SEASON” MAIZE
title_fullStr INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND PLANT DENSITY ON "SECOND-SEASON” MAIZE
title_full_unstemmed INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND PLANT DENSITY ON "SECOND-SEASON” MAIZE
title_sort INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND PLANT DENSITY ON "SECOND-SEASON” MAIZE
author Ben, Luis Humberto Bahú
author_facet Ben, Luis Humberto Bahú
Peiter, Marcia Xavier
Robaina, Adroaldo Dias
Parizi, Ana Rita Costenaro
Silva, Gideon Ujacov da
author_role author
author2 Peiter, Marcia Xavier
Robaina, Adroaldo Dias
Parizi, Ana Rita Costenaro
Silva, Gideon Ujacov da
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ben, Luis Humberto Bahú
Peiter, Marcia Xavier
Robaina, Adroaldo Dias
Parizi, Ana Rita Costenaro
Silva, Gideon Ujacov da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zea mays L.. Irrigation management. Yield components.
Zea mays L. Manejo de irrigação. Componentes de produção.
topic Zea mays L.. Irrigation management. Yield components.
Zea mays L. Manejo de irrigação. Componentes de produção.
description This study assessed the effect of different irrigation levels and plant densities on maize crops cultivated during the second season in the Western Border region of the State of Rio Grande do Sul. This work was conducted at the Federal Institute of Farroupilha – Alegrete Campus/RS – between January and June 2014. Treatments were arranged in a completely randomized 5 × 4 factorial design, with 3 replicates each. Irrigation of fixed amounts of water that were based on the evapotranspiration of the culture (Etc): 0, 50, 75, 100, and 125% of Etc were applied at 5-day intervals. Four densities of plants were defined (4, 7, 10, and 13 plants m-2). We assessed number of maize ears per plant, number of grains per ear, aboveground dry matter, mass of 100 grains, harvest index, and grain productivity. The number of grains per ear, mass of 100 grains, and grain yield were influenced by irrigation levels. Plant density and water depth influenced the number of grains per ear, the mass of 100 grains, and grain productivity. The highest yield of winter maize grain was achieved with a combination of 13 plants per m-2 and an irrigation level of 100% of Etc. Specific densities of plants maximized the yield of maize at each irrigation level, demonstrating that choice of plant density is a critical variable in the second crop of maize, and significantly influences the components of production.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4790
10.1590/1983-21252016v29n317rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4790
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252016v29n317rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/4790/pdf_406
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2016); 665-676
Revista Caatinga; v. 29 n. 3 (2016); 665-676
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674025539862528