INTERCROPPING OF EGGPLANT AND TOMATO AS FUNCTION OF TIMES OF TRANSPLANT AND CROPPING SEASON

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cecílio Filho, Arthur Bernardes
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Alves, Anarlete Ursulino, Galati, Vanessa Cury, Bezerra Neto, Francisco, Barbosa, José Carlos, Machado, Beliza Queiroz Vieira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10047
Resumo: The use of intercropping system allows crops to better utilize inputs supplied and the productive capacity of the area, which can be advantageous to the farmer. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the production performance of eggplant and industrial tomato intercropped as a function of the date of eggplant transplantation compared with tomato transplantation, in two seasons. Ten dates of eggplant transplantation were evaluated (-30, -25, -20, -15, -10, -5, 0, + 5, +10 and +15 days compared with tomato transplantation), with the first season from February to September 2009 and the second from August 2009 to February 2010. The number of commercial fruits per plant, commercial yield per plant and commercial yield of eggplant and tomato were influenced by the date of transplanting of eggplant. Highest eggplant yields were obtained in the second season, due to the more favorable weather conditions for the development of this crop. Late eggplant transplants resulted in yield losses due to tomato interference. For tomatoes, the later the eggplant was transplanted, the higher the yield. Therefore, it is concluded that the species have a high degree of interference with each other and the variation in the time of eggplant transplantation influenced the production characters of both crops. In terms of production, the intercropping of these species may not be economically viable for the farmer due to negative influences on the growth, development and production of these crops.
id UFERSA-1_300c302052229a13d19540a2bb9cc93e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10047
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling INTERCROPPING OF EGGPLANT AND TOMATO AS FUNCTION OF TIMES OF TRANSPLANT AND CROPPING SEASONCONSÓRCIO DE BERINJELEIRA E TOMATEIRO EM FUNÇÃO DA DATA DE TRANSPLANTIO E ÉPOCA DE CULTIVOAssociação de culturas. Solanum lycopersicum. Solanum melongena. Rendimento comercial.Cropping systems. Solanum lycopersicum. Solanum melongena. Commercial Yield.The use of intercropping system allows crops to better utilize inputs supplied and the productive capacity of the area, which can be advantageous to the farmer. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the production performance of eggplant and industrial tomato intercropped as a function of the date of eggplant transplantation compared with tomato transplantation, in two seasons. Ten dates of eggplant transplantation were evaluated (-30, -25, -20, -15, -10, -5, 0, + 5, +10 and +15 days compared with tomato transplantation), with the first season from February to September 2009 and the second from August 2009 to February 2010. The number of commercial fruits per plant, commercial yield per plant and commercial yield of eggplant and tomato were influenced by the date of transplanting of eggplant. Highest eggplant yields were obtained in the second season, due to the more favorable weather conditions for the development of this crop. Late eggplant transplants resulted in yield losses due to tomato interference. For tomatoes, the later the eggplant was transplanted, the higher the yield. Therefore, it is concluded that the species have a high degree of interference with each other and the variation in the time of eggplant transplantation influenced the production characters of both crops. In terms of production, the intercropping of these species may not be economically viable for the farmer due to negative influences on the growth, development and production of these crops.A utilização do sistema consorciado permite às culturas explorar melhor os insumos utilizados e a capacidade produtiva da área, podendo ser vantajoso ao produtor. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o desempenho produtivo da berinjela e do tomate indústria consorciados em função da data de transplante da berinjela em relação ao tomate, em duas épocas. Foram avaliadas 10 datas de transplante de berinjela (-30, -25, -20, -15, -10, -5, 0, + 5, +10 e +15 dias em relação ao transplante de tomate), sendo a primeira época de fevereiro a setembro de 2009, e a segunda de agosto de 2009 a fevereiro de 2010. O número de frutos comerciais por planta, a produtividade comercial por planta e a produtividade comercial de berinjela e tomate foram influenciadas pela data de transplante da berinjela. As maiores produtividades de berinjela foram obtidas na segunda safra, devido às condições climáticas mais favoráveis para o desenvolvimento dessa cultura. Os transplantes tardios de berinjela acarretaram em perdas na produtividade devido a interferência do tomate. Para o tomate, quanto mais tardio o transplante da berinjeleira, maior foi a produtividade. Portanto, conclui-se que as espécies apresentam alto grau de interferência umas nas outras e que a variação na época do transplante da berinjela influenciou nos caracteres produtivos de ambas culturas. Em termos produtivos, o consórcio dessas espécies pode não ser economicamente viável ao produtor devido as influências negativas no crescimento, desenvolvimento e produção dessas culturas.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2022-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1004710.1590/1983-21252022v35n204rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 35 No. 2 (2022); 276-287Revista Caatinga; v. 35 n. 2 (2022); 276-2871983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10047/10898Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCecílio Filho, Arthur Bernardes Alves, Anarlete UrsulinoGalati, Vanessa CuryBezerra Neto, Francisco Barbosa, José CarlosMachado, Beliza Queiroz Vieira2023-07-03T17:38:59Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10047Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:54.986012Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv INTERCROPPING OF EGGPLANT AND TOMATO AS FUNCTION OF TIMES OF TRANSPLANT AND CROPPING SEASON
CONSÓRCIO DE BERINJELEIRA E TOMATEIRO EM FUNÇÃO DA DATA DE TRANSPLANTIO E ÉPOCA DE CULTIVO
title INTERCROPPING OF EGGPLANT AND TOMATO AS FUNCTION OF TIMES OF TRANSPLANT AND CROPPING SEASON
spellingShingle INTERCROPPING OF EGGPLANT AND TOMATO AS FUNCTION OF TIMES OF TRANSPLANT AND CROPPING SEASON
Cecílio Filho, Arthur Bernardes
Associação de culturas. Solanum lycopersicum. Solanum melongena. Rendimento comercial.
Cropping systems. Solanum lycopersicum. Solanum melongena. Commercial Yield.
title_short INTERCROPPING OF EGGPLANT AND TOMATO AS FUNCTION OF TIMES OF TRANSPLANT AND CROPPING SEASON
title_full INTERCROPPING OF EGGPLANT AND TOMATO AS FUNCTION OF TIMES OF TRANSPLANT AND CROPPING SEASON
title_fullStr INTERCROPPING OF EGGPLANT AND TOMATO AS FUNCTION OF TIMES OF TRANSPLANT AND CROPPING SEASON
title_full_unstemmed INTERCROPPING OF EGGPLANT AND TOMATO AS FUNCTION OF TIMES OF TRANSPLANT AND CROPPING SEASON
title_sort INTERCROPPING OF EGGPLANT AND TOMATO AS FUNCTION OF TIMES OF TRANSPLANT AND CROPPING SEASON
author Cecílio Filho, Arthur Bernardes
author_facet Cecílio Filho, Arthur Bernardes
Alves, Anarlete Ursulino
Galati, Vanessa Cury
Bezerra Neto, Francisco
Barbosa, José Carlos
Machado, Beliza Queiroz Vieira
author_role author
author2 Alves, Anarlete Ursulino
Galati, Vanessa Cury
Bezerra Neto, Francisco
Barbosa, José Carlos
Machado, Beliza Queiroz Vieira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cecílio Filho, Arthur Bernardes
Alves, Anarlete Ursulino
Galati, Vanessa Cury
Bezerra Neto, Francisco
Barbosa, José Carlos
Machado, Beliza Queiroz Vieira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Associação de culturas. Solanum lycopersicum. Solanum melongena. Rendimento comercial.
Cropping systems. Solanum lycopersicum. Solanum melongena. Commercial Yield.
topic Associação de culturas. Solanum lycopersicum. Solanum melongena. Rendimento comercial.
Cropping systems. Solanum lycopersicum. Solanum melongena. Commercial Yield.
description The use of intercropping system allows crops to better utilize inputs supplied and the productive capacity of the area, which can be advantageous to the farmer. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the production performance of eggplant and industrial tomato intercropped as a function of the date of eggplant transplantation compared with tomato transplantation, in two seasons. Ten dates of eggplant transplantation were evaluated (-30, -25, -20, -15, -10, -5, 0, + 5, +10 and +15 days compared with tomato transplantation), with the first season from February to September 2009 and the second from August 2009 to February 2010. The number of commercial fruits per plant, commercial yield per plant and commercial yield of eggplant and tomato were influenced by the date of transplanting of eggplant. Highest eggplant yields were obtained in the second season, due to the more favorable weather conditions for the development of this crop. Late eggplant transplants resulted in yield losses due to tomato interference. For tomatoes, the later the eggplant was transplanted, the higher the yield. Therefore, it is concluded that the species have a high degree of interference with each other and the variation in the time of eggplant transplantation influenced the production characters of both crops. In terms of production, the intercropping of these species may not be economically viable for the farmer due to negative influences on the growth, development and production of these crops.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10047
10.1590/1983-21252022v35n204rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10047
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252022v35n204rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10047/10898
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 35 No. 2 (2022); 276-287
Revista Caatinga; v. 35 n. 2 (2022); 276-287
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674029403865088