EFFECTS OF COMPETITION AND WATER DEFICIT ON SUNFLOWER AND WEED GROWTH
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7925 |
Resumo: | In the agricultural environment it is common the occurrence of biotic and abiotic stress, such as weed interference and soil water deficit. The understanding of this interaction may contribute to the development of efficient weed management strategies. In this way, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of competition and water deficit on the growth of sunflower and weeds. The experiment was carried out in a randomized block design, with four replications. The treatments were arranged in factorial 5x2, with the first factor corresponding to the competition arrangements between the species (sunflower + W. indica; sunflower + A. spinosus; sunflower, W. indica and A. spinosus in monoculture), and the second of water regimes (irrigated and water deficit). The water deficit was established when the sunflower plants had six expanded leaves - V6 stage and maintained until the rate of CO2 assimilation of the plants reached values close to zero (6 days), when irrigation was resumed. Competition between plants reduced the growth of sunflower, W. indica and A. spinosus. The species W. indica and A. spinosus aggravated the negative effects of water deficit on sunflower growth. The water deficit did not affect the growth of the specie W. indica. A. spinosus was more competitive with sunflower than W. indica. |
id |
UFERSA-1_37c72266e2a1792684d18e9b92d72397 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7925 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
EFFECTS OF COMPETITION AND WATER DEFICIT ON SUNFLOWER AND WEED GROWTHEFEITOS DA COMPETIÇÃO E DO DÉFICIT HÍDRICO SOBRE O CRESCIMENTO DE GIRASSOL E PLANTAS DANINHASHelianthus annuus. Amaranthus spinosus. Waltheria indica. Water stress. Interference.Helianthus annuus. Amaranthus spinosus. Waltheria indica. Estresse hídrico. Interferência.In the agricultural environment it is common the occurrence of biotic and abiotic stress, such as weed interference and soil water deficit. The understanding of this interaction may contribute to the development of efficient weed management strategies. In this way, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of competition and water deficit on the growth of sunflower and weeds. The experiment was carried out in a randomized block design, with four replications. The treatments were arranged in factorial 5x2, with the first factor corresponding to the competition arrangements between the species (sunflower + W. indica; sunflower + A. spinosus; sunflower, W. indica and A. spinosus in monoculture), and the second of water regimes (irrigated and water deficit). The water deficit was established when the sunflower plants had six expanded leaves - V6 stage and maintained until the rate of CO2 assimilation of the plants reached values close to zero (6 days), when irrigation was resumed. Competition between plants reduced the growth of sunflower, W. indica and A. spinosus. The species W. indica and A. spinosus aggravated the negative effects of water deficit on sunflower growth. The water deficit did not affect the growth of the specie W. indica. A. spinosus was more competitive with sunflower than W. indica.No ambiente agrícola é comum a ocorrência de estresse de origem biótica e abiótica, como a interferência das plantas daninhas e o déficit hídrico no solo, respectivamente. Porém, pouco se conhece sobre os efeitos da interação desses estresses sobre o crescimento de espécies cultivadas e daninhas. Desta maneira, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar os efeitos da competição e do déficit hídrico sobre o crescimento de girassol e plantas daninhas. O experimento foi realizado em delineamento em blocos casualizado, com quatro repetições. Os tratamentos foram arranjados em fatorial 5x2, com o primeiro fator correspondente aos arranjos de competição entre as espécies (girassol + Waltheria indica; girassol + Amaranthus spinosus; girassol, W. indica e A. spinosus em monocultivo), e o segundo dos regimes hídricos (irrigado e déficit hídrico). O déficit hídrico foi estabelecido quando as plantas de girassol apresentavam seis folhas expandidas – estádio V6 e mantido até que a taxa de assimilação de CO2 das plantas alcançou valores próximos à zero (6 dias), momento em que a irrigação foi retomada. A competição entre plantas reduziu o crescimento do girassol, W. indica e A. spinosus. As espécies W. indica e A. spinosus agravaram os efeitos negativos do déficit hídrico sobre o crescimento do girassol. O déficit hídrico não afetou o crescimento da espécie W. indica. O A. spinosus foi mais competitivo com o girassol do que a W. indica.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-05-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/792510.1590/1983-21252019v32n204rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2019); 318-328Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 2 (2019); 318-3281983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7925/9947Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Murilo MeiraFreitas, Cláudia Dayanny MeloOliveira, Fernando Sarmento deMesquita, Hélida Campos deSilva, Tatiane SeveroSilva, Daniel Valadão2023-07-20T17:08:25Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7925Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:37.416812Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
EFFECTS OF COMPETITION AND WATER DEFICIT ON SUNFLOWER AND WEED GROWTH EFEITOS DA COMPETIÇÃO E DO DÉFICIT HÍDRICO SOBRE O CRESCIMENTO DE GIRASSOL E PLANTAS DANINHAS |
title |
EFFECTS OF COMPETITION AND WATER DEFICIT ON SUNFLOWER AND WEED GROWTH |
spellingShingle |
EFFECTS OF COMPETITION AND WATER DEFICIT ON SUNFLOWER AND WEED GROWTH Soares, Murilo Meira Helianthus annuus. Amaranthus spinosus. Waltheria indica. Water stress. Interference. Helianthus annuus. Amaranthus spinosus. Waltheria indica. Estresse hídrico. Interferência. |
title_short |
EFFECTS OF COMPETITION AND WATER DEFICIT ON SUNFLOWER AND WEED GROWTH |
title_full |
EFFECTS OF COMPETITION AND WATER DEFICIT ON SUNFLOWER AND WEED GROWTH |
title_fullStr |
EFFECTS OF COMPETITION AND WATER DEFICIT ON SUNFLOWER AND WEED GROWTH |
title_full_unstemmed |
EFFECTS OF COMPETITION AND WATER DEFICIT ON SUNFLOWER AND WEED GROWTH |
title_sort |
EFFECTS OF COMPETITION AND WATER DEFICIT ON SUNFLOWER AND WEED GROWTH |
author |
Soares, Murilo Meira |
author_facet |
Soares, Murilo Meira Freitas, Cláudia Dayanny Melo Oliveira, Fernando Sarmento de Mesquita, Hélida Campos de Silva, Tatiane Severo Silva, Daniel Valadão |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freitas, Cláudia Dayanny Melo Oliveira, Fernando Sarmento de Mesquita, Hélida Campos de Silva, Tatiane Severo Silva, Daniel Valadão |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soares, Murilo Meira Freitas, Cláudia Dayanny Melo Oliveira, Fernando Sarmento de Mesquita, Hélida Campos de Silva, Tatiane Severo Silva, Daniel Valadão |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Helianthus annuus. Amaranthus spinosus. Waltheria indica. Water stress. Interference. Helianthus annuus. Amaranthus spinosus. Waltheria indica. Estresse hídrico. Interferência. |
topic |
Helianthus annuus. Amaranthus spinosus. Waltheria indica. Water stress. Interference. Helianthus annuus. Amaranthus spinosus. Waltheria indica. Estresse hídrico. Interferência. |
description |
In the agricultural environment it is common the occurrence of biotic and abiotic stress, such as weed interference and soil water deficit. The understanding of this interaction may contribute to the development of efficient weed management strategies. In this way, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of competition and water deficit on the growth of sunflower and weeds. The experiment was carried out in a randomized block design, with four replications. The treatments were arranged in factorial 5x2, with the first factor corresponding to the competition arrangements between the species (sunflower + W. indica; sunflower + A. spinosus; sunflower, W. indica and A. spinosus in monoculture), and the second of water regimes (irrigated and water deficit). The water deficit was established when the sunflower plants had six expanded leaves - V6 stage and maintained until the rate of CO2 assimilation of the plants reached values close to zero (6 days), when irrigation was resumed. Competition between plants reduced the growth of sunflower, W. indica and A. spinosus. The species W. indica and A. spinosus aggravated the negative effects of water deficit on sunflower growth. The water deficit did not affect the growth of the specie W. indica. A. spinosus was more competitive with sunflower than W. indica. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7925 10.1590/1983-21252019v32n204rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7925 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252019v32n204rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/7925/9947 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2019); 318-328 Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 2 (2019); 318-328 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674027642257408 |