PRODUCTIVITY OF IRRIGATED PEANUT PLANTS UNDER PULSE AND CONTINUOUS DRIPPING IRRIGATION WITH BRACKISH WATER

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cruz, Ruana Iris Fernandes
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Silva, Gerônimo Ferreira da, Silva, Manassés Mesquita da, Silva, Alan Henrique Santos, Santos Júnior, José Amilton, França e Silva, Ênio Farias de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9455
Resumo: Pulse irrigation may be more advantageous for peanut crops than continuous irrigation, when using brackish water. However, studies on pulse irrigation with brackish water considering the environmental conditions of the Northeast region of Brazil using are incipient. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of using brackish water for pulse and continuous dripping irrigations on the grain yield and production characteristics of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) crops. A completely randomized block design with four repetitions was used, in a 6×2 factorial arrangement consisted of six electrical conductivities of the irrigation water (EC; 0.2, 1.6, 2.8, 4.0, 5.2, and 6.4 dS m-1) set by adding NaCl to the irrigation water, which originally had 0.2 dS m-1, until reaching the respective EC; and two irrigation methods (pulse and continuous). The evaluated variables were fresh and dry weights of shoot, 10 grains, pods, grains, and production; number of pods and grains; and percentages of empty pods (EP%) and perfect grains (PG%). The addition of salt to the irrigation water negatively affected all variables studied, except for EP% and PG%. The lowest EP% were found for the pulse irrigation, which increased the pod and grain yields, regardless of the EC of the irrigation water. Under the conditions of the present study, the use of brackish waters with electrical conductivities of up to 2.98 dS m-1 is viable for peanut production.  
id UFERSA-1_46e78b959b0d614289eb86daf472a306
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9455
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling PRODUCTIVITY OF IRRIGATED PEANUT PLANTS UNDER PULSE AND CONTINUOUS DRIPPING IRRIGATION WITH BRACKISH WATERPRODUÇÃO DE AMENDOIM IRRIGADO COM ÁGUAS SALOBRAS VIA GOTEJAMENTO PULSADO E CONTÍNUOArachis hypogaea L. Salinidade. Cloreto de sódio. Irrigação por pulsos.Arachis hypogaea L. Salinity. Sodium chloride. Pulse irrigation.Pulse irrigation may be more advantageous for peanut crops than continuous irrigation, when using brackish water. However, studies on pulse irrigation with brackish water considering the environmental conditions of the Northeast region of Brazil using are incipient. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of using brackish water for pulse and continuous dripping irrigations on the grain yield and production characteristics of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) crops. A completely randomized block design with four repetitions was used, in a 6×2 factorial arrangement consisted of six electrical conductivities of the irrigation water (EC; 0.2, 1.6, 2.8, 4.0, 5.2, and 6.4 dS m-1) set by adding NaCl to the irrigation water, which originally had 0.2 dS m-1, until reaching the respective EC; and two irrigation methods (pulse and continuous). The evaluated variables were fresh and dry weights of shoot, 10 grains, pods, grains, and production; number of pods and grains; and percentages of empty pods (EP%) and perfect grains (PG%). The addition of salt to the irrigation water negatively affected all variables studied, except for EP% and PG%. The lowest EP% were found for the pulse irrigation, which increased the pod and grain yields, regardless of the EC of the irrigation water. Under the conditions of the present study, the use of brackish waters with electrical conductivities of up to 2.98 dS m-1 is viable for peanut production.  A irrigação por pulsos pode proporcionar maiores rendimentos para a cultura do amendoim em comparação a irrigação contínua com a utilização de águas salobras, contudo, estudos para as condições do Nordeste brasileiro utilizando esta técnica de manejo da irrigação associada ao uso de águas salobras são incipientes. Diante disso, objetivou-se com o trabalho avaliar o efeito do uso de águas salobras e da irrigação por gotejamento pulsado e contínuo sobre a produção de grãos e características produtivas do amendoim (Arachis hypogaea L.). O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o de blocos casualizados, em esquema fatorial de 6 x 2, composto por seis condutividades elétricas da água de irrigação (CEa: 0,2; 1,6; 2,8; 4,0; 5,2 e 6,4 dS m-1), na qual foi adicionada NaCl a água de abastecimento (CEa: 0,2 dS m-1) até atingir as respectivas CEa, e duas formas de aplicação da irrigação por gotejamento (com pulsos e contínua), com quatro repetições. As variáveis analisadas foram: a massa fresca e seca da parte aérea de 10 grãos, das vagens, dos grãos e da produção, além do número de vagens, do número de grãos, da percentagem de vagens chochas (PerVC) e da percentagem de grãos perfeitos (PerGP). A salinidade influenciou negativamente todas as variáveis estudadas, com exceção do PerVC e da PerGP. As menores percentagens de vagens chochas foram obtidas com a irrigação pulsada que por sua vez demonstrou a maior produção de vagens e de grãos independentemente dos níveis de condutividade elétrica da água avaliados. Nas condições desta pesquisa, é viável produzir amendoim utilizando águas salobras com condutividade elétrica de até 2,98 dS m-1.  Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2021-03-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/945510.1590/1983-21252021v34n121rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2021); 208-218Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 1 (2021); 208-2181983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9455/10573Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCruz, Ruana Iris FernandesSilva, Gerônimo Ferreira daSilva, Manassés Mesquita daSilva, Alan Henrique SantosSantos Júnior, José AmiltonFrança e Silva, Ênio Farias de2023-07-19T12:35:07Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9455Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:49.975403Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PRODUCTIVITY OF IRRIGATED PEANUT PLANTS UNDER PULSE AND CONTINUOUS DRIPPING IRRIGATION WITH BRACKISH WATER
PRODUÇÃO DE AMENDOIM IRRIGADO COM ÁGUAS SALOBRAS VIA GOTEJAMENTO PULSADO E CONTÍNUO
title PRODUCTIVITY OF IRRIGATED PEANUT PLANTS UNDER PULSE AND CONTINUOUS DRIPPING IRRIGATION WITH BRACKISH WATER
spellingShingle PRODUCTIVITY OF IRRIGATED PEANUT PLANTS UNDER PULSE AND CONTINUOUS DRIPPING IRRIGATION WITH BRACKISH WATER
Cruz, Ruana Iris Fernandes
Arachis hypogaea L. Salinidade. Cloreto de sódio. Irrigação por pulsos.
Arachis hypogaea L. Salinity. Sodium chloride. Pulse irrigation.
title_short PRODUCTIVITY OF IRRIGATED PEANUT PLANTS UNDER PULSE AND CONTINUOUS DRIPPING IRRIGATION WITH BRACKISH WATER
title_full PRODUCTIVITY OF IRRIGATED PEANUT PLANTS UNDER PULSE AND CONTINUOUS DRIPPING IRRIGATION WITH BRACKISH WATER
title_fullStr PRODUCTIVITY OF IRRIGATED PEANUT PLANTS UNDER PULSE AND CONTINUOUS DRIPPING IRRIGATION WITH BRACKISH WATER
title_full_unstemmed PRODUCTIVITY OF IRRIGATED PEANUT PLANTS UNDER PULSE AND CONTINUOUS DRIPPING IRRIGATION WITH BRACKISH WATER
title_sort PRODUCTIVITY OF IRRIGATED PEANUT PLANTS UNDER PULSE AND CONTINUOUS DRIPPING IRRIGATION WITH BRACKISH WATER
author Cruz, Ruana Iris Fernandes
author_facet Cruz, Ruana Iris Fernandes
Silva, Gerônimo Ferreira da
Silva, Manassés Mesquita da
Silva, Alan Henrique Santos
Santos Júnior, José Amilton
França e Silva, Ênio Farias de
author_role author
author2 Silva, Gerônimo Ferreira da
Silva, Manassés Mesquita da
Silva, Alan Henrique Santos
Santos Júnior, José Amilton
França e Silva, Ênio Farias de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cruz, Ruana Iris Fernandes
Silva, Gerônimo Ferreira da
Silva, Manassés Mesquita da
Silva, Alan Henrique Santos
Santos Júnior, José Amilton
França e Silva, Ênio Farias de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arachis hypogaea L. Salinidade. Cloreto de sódio. Irrigação por pulsos.
Arachis hypogaea L. Salinity. Sodium chloride. Pulse irrigation.
topic Arachis hypogaea L. Salinidade. Cloreto de sódio. Irrigação por pulsos.
Arachis hypogaea L. Salinity. Sodium chloride. Pulse irrigation.
description Pulse irrigation may be more advantageous for peanut crops than continuous irrigation, when using brackish water. However, studies on pulse irrigation with brackish water considering the environmental conditions of the Northeast region of Brazil using are incipient. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of using brackish water for pulse and continuous dripping irrigations on the grain yield and production characteristics of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) crops. A completely randomized block design with four repetitions was used, in a 6×2 factorial arrangement consisted of six electrical conductivities of the irrigation water (EC; 0.2, 1.6, 2.8, 4.0, 5.2, and 6.4 dS m-1) set by adding NaCl to the irrigation water, which originally had 0.2 dS m-1, until reaching the respective EC; and two irrigation methods (pulse and continuous). The evaluated variables were fresh and dry weights of shoot, 10 grains, pods, grains, and production; number of pods and grains; and percentages of empty pods (EP%) and perfect grains (PG%). The addition of salt to the irrigation water negatively affected all variables studied, except for EP% and PG%. The lowest EP% were found for the pulse irrigation, which increased the pod and grain yields, regardless of the EC of the irrigation water. Under the conditions of the present study, the use of brackish waters with electrical conductivities of up to 2.98 dS m-1 is viable for peanut production.  
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9455
10.1590/1983-21252021v34n121rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9455
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252021v34n121rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/9455/10573
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 1 (2021); 208-218
Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 1 (2021); 208-218
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674028880625664