ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santana, Falkner Michael de Sousa
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Souza, Ênio Gomes Flôr, Santos, Manoel Galdino dos, Silva, Antonia Francilene Alves da, Barros Júnior, Aurélio Paes, Lins, Hamurábi Anizio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10143
Resumo: The use of green manure from spontaneous species has gained prominence for vegetable crops focused on environmental sustainability and is an alternative method for the Semiarid region in the Northeast of Brazil. Two experiments were conducted in two growing seasons (autumn and spring-summer), in Serra Talhada, PE, Brazil, to evaluate the effects of different amounts of biomass of Calotropis procera (roostertree) and incorporation times on the agro-economic performance of beet crops. A randomized block experimental design was used, with three replications, in a 4×4 factorial arrangement; the first factor consisted of amounts of C. procera biomass (5.4, 8.8, 12.2, and 15.6 Mg ha-1 on a dry basis) and the second factor consisted of times of incorporation into the soil (0, 10, 20, and 30 days before planting beet). Commercial root yield, production costs, and the following economic indicators were determined: gross income, net income, return rate, and profitability index. The use of 15.6 Mg ha-1 of C. procera biomass resulted in the highest gross and net incomes and the use of 5.4 and 12.2 Mg ha-1 resulted in the best return rates and profitability indexes in autumn and spring-summer seasons, respectively; the planting time was considered as ideal for the biomass incorporation. The spring-summer growing season resulted in a higher economic return than the autumn growing season. The use of C. procera as a green manure for beet production is economically viable, regardless of the factors evaluated.  
id UFERSA-1_cfe3a2ccc6f7d344cceed6789c537fae
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10143
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONSVIABILIDADE ECONÔMICA DA BETERRABA ADUBADA COM Calotropis procera EM DUAS ÉPOCAS DE CULTIVOBeta vulgaris L. Custo. Rentabilidade. Flor-de-seda. Agricultura sustentável.Beta vulgaris L. Cost. Profitability. Roostertree. Sustainable agriculture.The use of green manure from spontaneous species has gained prominence for vegetable crops focused on environmental sustainability and is an alternative method for the Semiarid region in the Northeast of Brazil. Two experiments were conducted in two growing seasons (autumn and spring-summer), in Serra Talhada, PE, Brazil, to evaluate the effects of different amounts of biomass of Calotropis procera (roostertree) and incorporation times on the agro-economic performance of beet crops. A randomized block experimental design was used, with three replications, in a 4×4 factorial arrangement; the first factor consisted of amounts of C. procera biomass (5.4, 8.8, 12.2, and 15.6 Mg ha-1 on a dry basis) and the second factor consisted of times of incorporation into the soil (0, 10, 20, and 30 days before planting beet). Commercial root yield, production costs, and the following economic indicators were determined: gross income, net income, return rate, and profitability index. The use of 15.6 Mg ha-1 of C. procera biomass resulted in the highest gross and net incomes and the use of 5.4 and 12.2 Mg ha-1 resulted in the best return rates and profitability indexes in autumn and spring-summer seasons, respectively; the planting time was considered as ideal for the biomass incorporation. The spring-summer growing season resulted in a higher economic return than the autumn growing season. The use of C. procera as a green manure for beet production is economically viable, regardless of the factors evaluated.  A utilização da adubação verde com o uso de espécies espontâneas tem ganhando destaque no cultivo de hortaliças, visando a sustentabilidade do ambiente e sendo um método alternativo para o Semiárido nordestino. Dois experimentos foram conduzidos em duas épocas de cultivo (outono e primavera-verão), em Serra Talhada, PE, Brasil, a fim de se avaliar os efeitos de quantidades de biomassa e tempos de incorporação de Calotropis procera (Flor-de-seda) no desempenho agroeconômico da beterraba. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi em blocos casualizados, com três repetições. Os tratamentos foram arranjados em esquema fatorial 4 x 4, sendo o primeiro fator correspondente às quantidades de C. procera (5,4; 8,8; 12,2 e 15,6 Mg ha-1 em base seca) e o segundo, aos tempos de incorporação ao solo (0, 10, 20 e 30 dias antes da semeadura da beterraba). Além da produtividade comercial de raízes e dos custos de produção, foram determinados: renda bruta, renda líquida, taxa de retorno e índice de lucratividade. A quantidade de 15,6 Mg ha-1 de C. procera promoveu as maiores rendas bruta e líquida, enquanto que as quantidades de 5,4 e 12,2 Mg ha-1 obtiveram as melhores taxas de retorno e índices de lucratividade no outono e primavera-verão, respectivamente, sendo considerada ideal a adubação realizada no momento do plantio. O cultivo de primavera-verão possibilitou retorno econômico superior à semeadura de outono. Independente dos fatores, o uso da C. procera como adubo verde na produção de beterraba foi viável agroeconomicamente.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2021-09-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1014310.1590/1983-21252021v34n412rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021); 846-856Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 4 (2021); 846-8561983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10143/10747Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantana, Falkner Michael de SousaSouza, Ênio Gomes FlôrSantos, Manoel Galdino dosSilva, Antonia Francilene Alves daBarros Júnior, Aurélio PaesLins, Hamurábi Anizio2023-07-04T13:36:19Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10143Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:55.459684Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS
VIABILIDADE ECONÔMICA DA BETERRABA ADUBADA COM Calotropis procera EM DUAS ÉPOCAS DE CULTIVO
title ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS
spellingShingle ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS
Santana, Falkner Michael de Sousa
Beta vulgaris L. Custo. Rentabilidade. Flor-de-seda. Agricultura sustentável.
Beta vulgaris L. Cost. Profitability. Roostertree. Sustainable agriculture.
title_short ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS
title_full ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS
title_fullStr ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS
title_full_unstemmed ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS
title_sort ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS
author Santana, Falkner Michael de Sousa
author_facet Santana, Falkner Michael de Sousa
Souza, Ênio Gomes Flôr
Santos, Manoel Galdino dos
Silva, Antonia Francilene Alves da
Barros Júnior, Aurélio Paes
Lins, Hamurábi Anizio
author_role author
author2 Souza, Ênio Gomes Flôr
Santos, Manoel Galdino dos
Silva, Antonia Francilene Alves da
Barros Júnior, Aurélio Paes
Lins, Hamurábi Anizio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santana, Falkner Michael de Sousa
Souza, Ênio Gomes Flôr
Santos, Manoel Galdino dos
Silva, Antonia Francilene Alves da
Barros Júnior, Aurélio Paes
Lins, Hamurábi Anizio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beta vulgaris L. Custo. Rentabilidade. Flor-de-seda. Agricultura sustentável.
Beta vulgaris L. Cost. Profitability. Roostertree. Sustainable agriculture.
topic Beta vulgaris L. Custo. Rentabilidade. Flor-de-seda. Agricultura sustentável.
Beta vulgaris L. Cost. Profitability. Roostertree. Sustainable agriculture.
description The use of green manure from spontaneous species has gained prominence for vegetable crops focused on environmental sustainability and is an alternative method for the Semiarid region in the Northeast of Brazil. Two experiments were conducted in two growing seasons (autumn and spring-summer), in Serra Talhada, PE, Brazil, to evaluate the effects of different amounts of biomass of Calotropis procera (roostertree) and incorporation times on the agro-economic performance of beet crops. A randomized block experimental design was used, with three replications, in a 4×4 factorial arrangement; the first factor consisted of amounts of C. procera biomass (5.4, 8.8, 12.2, and 15.6 Mg ha-1 on a dry basis) and the second factor consisted of times of incorporation into the soil (0, 10, 20, and 30 days before planting beet). Commercial root yield, production costs, and the following economic indicators were determined: gross income, net income, return rate, and profitability index. The use of 15.6 Mg ha-1 of C. procera biomass resulted in the highest gross and net incomes and the use of 5.4 and 12.2 Mg ha-1 resulted in the best return rates and profitability indexes in autumn and spring-summer seasons, respectively; the planting time was considered as ideal for the biomass incorporation. The spring-summer growing season resulted in a higher economic return than the autumn growing season. The use of C. procera as a green manure for beet production is economically viable, regardless of the factors evaluated.  
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10143
10.1590/1983-21252021v34n412rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10143
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252021v34n412rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10143/10747
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021); 846-856
Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 4 (2021); 846-856
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674029425885184