ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Caatinga |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10143 |
Resumo: | The use of green manure from spontaneous species has gained prominence for vegetable crops focused on environmental sustainability and is an alternative method for the Semiarid region in the Northeast of Brazil. Two experiments were conducted in two growing seasons (autumn and spring-summer), in Serra Talhada, PE, Brazil, to evaluate the effects of different amounts of biomass of Calotropis procera (roostertree) and incorporation times on the agro-economic performance of beet crops. A randomized block experimental design was used, with three replications, in a 4×4 factorial arrangement; the first factor consisted of amounts of C. procera biomass (5.4, 8.8, 12.2, and 15.6 Mg ha-1 on a dry basis) and the second factor consisted of times of incorporation into the soil (0, 10, 20, and 30 days before planting beet). Commercial root yield, production costs, and the following economic indicators were determined: gross income, net income, return rate, and profitability index. The use of 15.6 Mg ha-1 of C. procera biomass resulted in the highest gross and net incomes and the use of 5.4 and 12.2 Mg ha-1 resulted in the best return rates and profitability indexes in autumn and spring-summer seasons, respectively; the planting time was considered as ideal for the biomass incorporation. The spring-summer growing season resulted in a higher economic return than the autumn growing season. The use of C. procera as a green manure for beet production is economically viable, regardless of the factors evaluated. |
id |
UFERSA-1_cfe3a2ccc6f7d344cceed6789c537fae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10143 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Caatinga |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONSVIABILIDADE ECONÔMICA DA BETERRABA ADUBADA COM Calotropis procera EM DUAS ÉPOCAS DE CULTIVOBeta vulgaris L. Custo. Rentabilidade. Flor-de-seda. Agricultura sustentável.Beta vulgaris L. Cost. Profitability. Roostertree. Sustainable agriculture.The use of green manure from spontaneous species has gained prominence for vegetable crops focused on environmental sustainability and is an alternative method for the Semiarid region in the Northeast of Brazil. Two experiments were conducted in two growing seasons (autumn and spring-summer), in Serra Talhada, PE, Brazil, to evaluate the effects of different amounts of biomass of Calotropis procera (roostertree) and incorporation times on the agro-economic performance of beet crops. A randomized block experimental design was used, with three replications, in a 4×4 factorial arrangement; the first factor consisted of amounts of C. procera biomass (5.4, 8.8, 12.2, and 15.6 Mg ha-1 on a dry basis) and the second factor consisted of times of incorporation into the soil (0, 10, 20, and 30 days before planting beet). Commercial root yield, production costs, and the following economic indicators were determined: gross income, net income, return rate, and profitability index. The use of 15.6 Mg ha-1 of C. procera biomass resulted in the highest gross and net incomes and the use of 5.4 and 12.2 Mg ha-1 resulted in the best return rates and profitability indexes in autumn and spring-summer seasons, respectively; the planting time was considered as ideal for the biomass incorporation. The spring-summer growing season resulted in a higher economic return than the autumn growing season. The use of C. procera as a green manure for beet production is economically viable, regardless of the factors evaluated. A utilização da adubação verde com o uso de espécies espontâneas tem ganhando destaque no cultivo de hortaliças, visando a sustentabilidade do ambiente e sendo um método alternativo para o Semiárido nordestino. Dois experimentos foram conduzidos em duas épocas de cultivo (outono e primavera-verão), em Serra Talhada, PE, Brasil, a fim de se avaliar os efeitos de quantidades de biomassa e tempos de incorporação de Calotropis procera (Flor-de-seda) no desempenho agroeconômico da beterraba. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi em blocos casualizados, com três repetições. Os tratamentos foram arranjados em esquema fatorial 4 x 4, sendo o primeiro fator correspondente às quantidades de C. procera (5,4; 8,8; 12,2 e 15,6 Mg ha-1 em base seca) e o segundo, aos tempos de incorporação ao solo (0, 10, 20 e 30 dias antes da semeadura da beterraba). Além da produtividade comercial de raízes e dos custos de produção, foram determinados: renda bruta, renda líquida, taxa de retorno e índice de lucratividade. A quantidade de 15,6 Mg ha-1 de C. procera promoveu as maiores rendas bruta e líquida, enquanto que as quantidades de 5,4 e 12,2 Mg ha-1 obtiveram as melhores taxas de retorno e índices de lucratividade no outono e primavera-verão, respectivamente, sendo considerada ideal a adubação realizada no momento do plantio. O cultivo de primavera-verão possibilitou retorno econômico superior à semeadura de outono. Independente dos fatores, o uso da C. procera como adubo verde na produção de beterraba foi viável agroeconomicamente.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2021-09-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1014310.1590/1983-21252021v34n412rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021); 846-856Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 4 (2021); 846-8561983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10143/10747Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantana, Falkner Michael de SousaSouza, Ênio Gomes FlôrSantos, Manoel Galdino dosSilva, Antonia Francilene Alves daBarros Júnior, Aurélio PaesLins, Hamurábi Anizio2023-07-04T13:36:19Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10143Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:55.459684Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS VIABILIDADE ECONÔMICA DA BETERRABA ADUBADA COM Calotropis procera EM DUAS ÉPOCAS DE CULTIVO |
title |
ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS |
spellingShingle |
ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS Santana, Falkner Michael de Sousa Beta vulgaris L. Custo. Rentabilidade. Flor-de-seda. Agricultura sustentável. Beta vulgaris L. Cost. Profitability. Roostertree. Sustainable agriculture. |
title_short |
ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS |
title_full |
ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS |
title_fullStr |
ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS |
title_full_unstemmed |
ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS |
title_sort |
ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF BEET CROPS USING Calotropis procera BIOMASS AS SOIL FERTILIZER IN TWO GROWING SEASONS |
author |
Santana, Falkner Michael de Sousa |
author_facet |
Santana, Falkner Michael de Sousa Souza, Ênio Gomes Flôr Santos, Manoel Galdino dos Silva, Antonia Francilene Alves da Barros Júnior, Aurélio Paes Lins, Hamurábi Anizio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Ênio Gomes Flôr Santos, Manoel Galdino dos Silva, Antonia Francilene Alves da Barros Júnior, Aurélio Paes Lins, Hamurábi Anizio |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santana, Falkner Michael de Sousa Souza, Ênio Gomes Flôr Santos, Manoel Galdino dos Silva, Antonia Francilene Alves da Barros Júnior, Aurélio Paes Lins, Hamurábi Anizio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Beta vulgaris L. Custo. Rentabilidade. Flor-de-seda. Agricultura sustentável. Beta vulgaris L. Cost. Profitability. Roostertree. Sustainable agriculture. |
topic |
Beta vulgaris L. Custo. Rentabilidade. Flor-de-seda. Agricultura sustentável. Beta vulgaris L. Cost. Profitability. Roostertree. Sustainable agriculture. |
description |
The use of green manure from spontaneous species has gained prominence for vegetable crops focused on environmental sustainability and is an alternative method for the Semiarid region in the Northeast of Brazil. Two experiments were conducted in two growing seasons (autumn and spring-summer), in Serra Talhada, PE, Brazil, to evaluate the effects of different amounts of biomass of Calotropis procera (roostertree) and incorporation times on the agro-economic performance of beet crops. A randomized block experimental design was used, with three replications, in a 4×4 factorial arrangement; the first factor consisted of amounts of C. procera biomass (5.4, 8.8, 12.2, and 15.6 Mg ha-1 on a dry basis) and the second factor consisted of times of incorporation into the soil (0, 10, 20, and 30 days before planting beet). Commercial root yield, production costs, and the following economic indicators were determined: gross income, net income, return rate, and profitability index. The use of 15.6 Mg ha-1 of C. procera biomass resulted in the highest gross and net incomes and the use of 5.4 and 12.2 Mg ha-1 resulted in the best return rates and profitability indexes in autumn and spring-summer seasons, respectively; the planting time was considered as ideal for the biomass incorporation. The spring-summer growing season resulted in a higher economic return than the autumn growing season. The use of C. procera as a green manure for beet production is economically viable, regardless of the factors evaluated. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10143 10.1590/1983-21252021v34n412rc |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10143 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1983-21252021v34n412rc |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10143/10747 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021); 846-856 Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 4 (2021); 846-856 1983-2125 0100-316X reponame:Revista Caatinga instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Caatinga |
collection |
Revista Caatinga |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1797674029425885184 |