CHICORY AND ARUGULA IN INTERCROPPING WITH COLLARD GREENS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cecilio Filho, Arthur Bernardes
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Medelo, María José Yáñez, Pontes, Sara Caroline de, Nascimento, Camila Seno
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10041
Resumo: Vegetable intercropping systems use complementarity between species to increase agricultural profitability. This study evaluated the effects of intercropping chicory and arugula species with collard greens on crop yield and land use efficiency (LUE). Six treatments, consisting of species planted as monocultures or intercropped in various combinations, were evaluated in a randomized block design with four replicates. The cultivars ‘Top Bunch’ (collard greens), ‘Pão de Açúcar’ (chicory) and ‘Folha Larga’ (arugula) were used. The yield of collard greens in monoculture did not differ from those obtained when they were intercropped with chicory, arugula, or both species, whereas chicory and arugula yields were higher in monoculture. However, even with yield losses for chicory and arugula in intercropping, LUE indices were greater than 1.0 in all intercropping systems, indicating their viability. The highest LUE index (2.41) was obtained in the chicory-arugula-collard green intercropping system.
id UFERSA-1_d0b8df73239dc8fe87debae9562ad663
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10041
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling CHICORY AND ARUGULA IN INTERCROPPING WITH COLLARD GREENSALMEIRÃO E RÚCULA EM CONSÓRCIO COM A COUVEBrassica oleracea L. var. acephala. Cichorium intybus. Eruca sativa. Índice de competição. Eficiência de uso da área.Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala. Cichorium intybus. Eruca sativa. Competition indices. Land use efficiency.Vegetable intercropping systems use complementarity between species to increase agricultural profitability. This study evaluated the effects of intercropping chicory and arugula species with collard greens on crop yield and land use efficiency (LUE). Six treatments, consisting of species planted as monocultures or intercropped in various combinations, were evaluated in a randomized block design with four replicates. The cultivars ‘Top Bunch’ (collard greens), ‘Pão de Açúcar’ (chicory) and ‘Folha Larga’ (arugula) were used. The yield of collard greens in monoculture did not differ from those obtained when they were intercropped with chicory, arugula, or both species, whereas chicory and arugula yields were higher in monoculture. However, even with yield losses for chicory and arugula in intercropping, LUE indices were greater than 1.0 in all intercropping systems, indicating their viability. The highest LUE index (2.41) was obtained in the chicory-arugula-collard green intercropping system.O consórcio de hortaliças é um sistema de cultivo que utiliza a complementaridade entre espécies para aumentar a rentabilidade da atividade agrícola. Nesse sentido, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito das espécies almeirão e rúcula em consórcio com a couve na produtividade das culturas e no índice de eficiência do uso da área (EUA). Seis tratamentos (espécies em consórcio e em monocultura) foram avaliados em delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com quatro repetições. Foram utilizadas as cultivares ‘Top Bunch’ (couve), ‘Pão de Açúcar’ (almeirão) e ‘Folha Larga’ (rúcula). A produtividade da couve em monocultura não diferiu das obtidas em consórcios com almeirão, rúcula ou com ambas as espécies, enquanto as produtividades do almeirão e da rúcula foram maiores no monocultivo. Entretanto, mesmo com perdas de produtividade pelo almeirão e rúcula, os índices de EUA foram maiores que 1,0 em todas as consorciações indicando a viabilidade do consórcio. Maior índice EUA (2,41) foi obtido no consórcio de almeirão-rúcula-couve.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2021-09-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1004110.1590/1983-21252021v34n404rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021); 772-779Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 4 (2021); 772-7791983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10041/10739Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCecilio Filho, Arthur BernardesMedelo, María José YáñezPontes, Sara Caroline deNascimento, Camila Seno2023-07-04T13:30:51Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/10041Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:54.930162Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CHICORY AND ARUGULA IN INTERCROPPING WITH COLLARD GREENS
ALMEIRÃO E RÚCULA EM CONSÓRCIO COM A COUVE
title CHICORY AND ARUGULA IN INTERCROPPING WITH COLLARD GREENS
spellingShingle CHICORY AND ARUGULA IN INTERCROPPING WITH COLLARD GREENS
Cecilio Filho, Arthur Bernardes
Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala. Cichorium intybus. Eruca sativa. Índice de competição. Eficiência de uso da área.
Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala. Cichorium intybus. Eruca sativa. Competition indices. Land use efficiency.
title_short CHICORY AND ARUGULA IN INTERCROPPING WITH COLLARD GREENS
title_full CHICORY AND ARUGULA IN INTERCROPPING WITH COLLARD GREENS
title_fullStr CHICORY AND ARUGULA IN INTERCROPPING WITH COLLARD GREENS
title_full_unstemmed CHICORY AND ARUGULA IN INTERCROPPING WITH COLLARD GREENS
title_sort CHICORY AND ARUGULA IN INTERCROPPING WITH COLLARD GREENS
author Cecilio Filho, Arthur Bernardes
author_facet Cecilio Filho, Arthur Bernardes
Medelo, María José Yáñez
Pontes, Sara Caroline de
Nascimento, Camila Seno
author_role author
author2 Medelo, María José Yáñez
Pontes, Sara Caroline de
Nascimento, Camila Seno
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cecilio Filho, Arthur Bernardes
Medelo, María José Yáñez
Pontes, Sara Caroline de
Nascimento, Camila Seno
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala. Cichorium intybus. Eruca sativa. Índice de competição. Eficiência de uso da área.
Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala. Cichorium intybus. Eruca sativa. Competition indices. Land use efficiency.
topic Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala. Cichorium intybus. Eruca sativa. Índice de competição. Eficiência de uso da área.
Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala. Cichorium intybus. Eruca sativa. Competition indices. Land use efficiency.
description Vegetable intercropping systems use complementarity between species to increase agricultural profitability. This study evaluated the effects of intercropping chicory and arugula species with collard greens on crop yield and land use efficiency (LUE). Six treatments, consisting of species planted as monocultures or intercropped in various combinations, were evaluated in a randomized block design with four replicates. The cultivars ‘Top Bunch’ (collard greens), ‘Pão de Açúcar’ (chicory) and ‘Folha Larga’ (arugula) were used. The yield of collard greens in monoculture did not differ from those obtained when they were intercropped with chicory, arugula, or both species, whereas chicory and arugula yields were higher in monoculture. However, even with yield losses for chicory and arugula in intercropping, LUE indices were greater than 1.0 in all intercropping systems, indicating their viability. The highest LUE index (2.41) was obtained in the chicory-arugula-collard green intercropping system.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10041
10.1590/1983-21252021v34n404rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10041
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252021v34n404rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/10041/10739
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 34 No. 4 (2021); 772-779
Revista Caatinga; v. 34 n. 4 (2021); 772-779
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674029401767936

Registros relacionados