POLYPHENOL OXIDASE AND PEROXIDASE ENZYME ASSAYS IN SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT TIMES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Samara Lopes de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Morais, Maria Aparecida dos Santos, Albuquerque, José Ricardo Tavares de, Barros Júnior, Aurélio Paes, Simões, Adriano do Nascimento, Fonseca, Kelem Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Caatinga
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8070
Resumo: Enzyme assays are based on methodologies described in the literature. However, the enzyme kinetics must be adjusted to obtain more reliable results. This study aimed to adjust assays by testing different polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) extract amounts and reaction times in sweet potato cultivars harvested at different times. Sweet potato cultivars Paraná, Mãe de Família, and ESAM1 were harvested at 120, 150, and 180 days after planting and minimally processed. A 0.25 g sample was used to determine PPO and POD activities immediately after minimal processing at each harvest. Extraction was performed in 1500 μL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.0). The PPO assay was performed by adding 10–50 μL extract, 1490–1450 μL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.0), and 1500 μL catechol (0.2 M). The POD assay was carried out by adding 10–50 μL extract to a reaction medium containing 1790–1750 μL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6), 100 μl guaiacol (5 g L-1), and 100 μL hydrogen peroxide (0.8 g L-1). In both cases, the evaluated reaction times were 1, 2, and 3 min. In the three cultivars, PPO and POD activities increased with the volume of extract and reaction time at all harvest times. The enzyme extract volume of 10 μL for 2 min promoted a continuous increase in PPO and POD enzyme activities in all studied cultivars and at all reaction times.
id UFERSA-1_d4645ab7e167983d35767a4cd21a7c9b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/8070
network_acronym_str UFERSA-1
network_name_str Revista Caatinga
repository_id_str
spelling POLYPHENOL OXIDASE AND PEROXIDASE ENZYME ASSAYS IN SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT TIMESENSAIOS ENZIMÁTICOS DA POLIFENOLOXIDASE E PEROXIDASE EM CULTIVARES DE BATATA DOCE COLHIDAS EM DIFERENTES ÉPOCASIpomoea batatas L. (Lam.). Standardization. Minimum processing.Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam.). Padronização. Processamento mínimo.Enzyme assays are based on methodologies described in the literature. However, the enzyme kinetics must be adjusted to obtain more reliable results. This study aimed to adjust assays by testing different polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) extract amounts and reaction times in sweet potato cultivars harvested at different times. Sweet potato cultivars Paraná, Mãe de Família, and ESAM1 were harvested at 120, 150, and 180 days after planting and minimally processed. A 0.25 g sample was used to determine PPO and POD activities immediately after minimal processing at each harvest. Extraction was performed in 1500 μL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.0). The PPO assay was performed by adding 10–50 μL extract, 1490–1450 μL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.0), and 1500 μL catechol (0.2 M). The POD assay was carried out by adding 10–50 μL extract to a reaction medium containing 1790–1750 μL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6), 100 μl guaiacol (5 g L-1), and 100 μL hydrogen peroxide (0.8 g L-1). In both cases, the evaluated reaction times were 1, 2, and 3 min. In the three cultivars, PPO and POD activities increased with the volume of extract and reaction time at all harvest times. The enzyme extract volume of 10 μL for 2 min promoted a continuous increase in PPO and POD enzyme activities in all studied cultivars and at all reaction times.Ensaios enzimáticos são baseados em metodologias descritas na literatura. Entretanto, a cinética enzimática deve ser ajustada para resultados mais confiáveis. Objetivou-se ajustar os ensaios testando diferentes volumes de extrato de polifenoloxidase (PPO) e peroxidase (POD) e tempos de reação em cultivares de batata-doce colhidas em diferentes épocas. As cultivares Paraná, Mãe de Família e ESAM1 foram colhidas aos 120, 150 e 180 dias e minimamente processadas. Amostra de 0,25 g foi usada para determinar as atividades de PPO e POD imediatamente após o processamento mínimo em cada colheita. A extração foi realizada em 1500 μL de tampão fosfato (0,2 M, pH 6,0). O ensaio para PPO foi realizado pela adição de 10 a 50 μL de extrato, 1490 a 1450 μL de tampão fosfato (0,2 M, pH 6,0) e 1500 μL de catecol (0,2 M). O ensaio para a POD foi realizado adicionando 10–50 μL de extrato a um meio de reação contendo 1790 a 1750 μL de tampão fosfato (0,2 M, pH 6), 100 μl de guaiacol (5 g L-1) e 100 μL de peróxido de hidrogênio (0,8 g L-1). Em ambos os casos, os tempos de reação avaliados foram 1, 2 e 3 min. Nas três cultivares, as atividades da PPO e POD aumentaram com o volume de extrato e tempo de reação em todas as épocas de colheita. Alíquota de 10 μL de extrato por 2 minutos promoveu um incremento contínuo na atividade da PPO e POD em todas as cultivares e tempos de reação estudados.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-05-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/807010.1590/1983-21252019v32n226rcREVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2019); 537-542Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 2 (2019); 537-5421983-21250100-316Xreponame:Revista Caatingainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8070/9969Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatingainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Samara Lopes deMorais, Maria Aparecida dos SantosAlbuquerque, José Ricardo Tavares deBarros Júnior, Aurélio PaesSimões, Adriano do NascimentoFonseca, Kelem Silva2023-07-20T17:19:50Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/8070Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/caatinga/oaipatricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br1983-21250100-316Xopendoar:2024-04-29T09:46:38.091493Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv POLYPHENOL OXIDASE AND PEROXIDASE ENZYME ASSAYS IN SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT TIMES
ENSAIOS ENZIMÁTICOS DA POLIFENOLOXIDASE E PEROXIDASE EM CULTIVARES DE BATATA DOCE COLHIDAS EM DIFERENTES ÉPOCAS
title POLYPHENOL OXIDASE AND PEROXIDASE ENZYME ASSAYS IN SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT TIMES
spellingShingle POLYPHENOL OXIDASE AND PEROXIDASE ENZYME ASSAYS IN SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT TIMES
Almeida, Samara Lopes de
Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam.). Standardization. Minimum processing.
Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam.). Padronização. Processamento mínimo.
title_short POLYPHENOL OXIDASE AND PEROXIDASE ENZYME ASSAYS IN SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT TIMES
title_full POLYPHENOL OXIDASE AND PEROXIDASE ENZYME ASSAYS IN SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT TIMES
title_fullStr POLYPHENOL OXIDASE AND PEROXIDASE ENZYME ASSAYS IN SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT TIMES
title_full_unstemmed POLYPHENOL OXIDASE AND PEROXIDASE ENZYME ASSAYS IN SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT TIMES
title_sort POLYPHENOL OXIDASE AND PEROXIDASE ENZYME ASSAYS IN SWEET POTATO CULTIVARS HARVESTED AT DIFFERENT TIMES
author Almeida, Samara Lopes de
author_facet Almeida, Samara Lopes de
Morais, Maria Aparecida dos Santos
Albuquerque, José Ricardo Tavares de
Barros Júnior, Aurélio Paes
Simões, Adriano do Nascimento
Fonseca, Kelem Silva
author_role author
author2 Morais, Maria Aparecida dos Santos
Albuquerque, José Ricardo Tavares de
Barros Júnior, Aurélio Paes
Simões, Adriano do Nascimento
Fonseca, Kelem Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Samara Lopes de
Morais, Maria Aparecida dos Santos
Albuquerque, José Ricardo Tavares de
Barros Júnior, Aurélio Paes
Simões, Adriano do Nascimento
Fonseca, Kelem Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam.). Standardization. Minimum processing.
Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam.). Padronização. Processamento mínimo.
topic Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam.). Standardization. Minimum processing.
Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam.). Padronização. Processamento mínimo.
description Enzyme assays are based on methodologies described in the literature. However, the enzyme kinetics must be adjusted to obtain more reliable results. This study aimed to adjust assays by testing different polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (POD) extract amounts and reaction times in sweet potato cultivars harvested at different times. Sweet potato cultivars Paraná, Mãe de Família, and ESAM1 were harvested at 120, 150, and 180 days after planting and minimally processed. A 0.25 g sample was used to determine PPO and POD activities immediately after minimal processing at each harvest. Extraction was performed in 1500 μL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.0). The PPO assay was performed by adding 10–50 μL extract, 1490–1450 μL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.0), and 1500 μL catechol (0.2 M). The POD assay was carried out by adding 10–50 μL extract to a reaction medium containing 1790–1750 μL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6), 100 μl guaiacol (5 g L-1), and 100 μL hydrogen peroxide (0.8 g L-1). In both cases, the evaluated reaction times were 1, 2, and 3 min. In the three cultivars, PPO and POD activities increased with the volume of extract and reaction time at all harvest times. The enzyme extract volume of 10 μL for 2 min promoted a continuous increase in PPO and POD enzyme activities in all studied cultivars and at all reaction times.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8070
10.1590/1983-21252019v32n226rc
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8070
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1983-21252019v32n226rc
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/8070/9969
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Caatinga
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAATINGA; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2019); 537-542
Revista Caatinga; v. 32 n. 2 (2019); 537-542
1983-2125
0100-316X
reponame:Revista Caatinga
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Caatinga
collection Revista Caatinga
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Caatinga - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv patricio@ufersa.edu.br|| caatinga@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1797674027673714688