Veganism and animal welfare, scientific, ethical, and philosophical arguments

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mota-Rojas, Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Whittaker, Alexandra L., de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo, Ghezzi, Marcelo, Lezama-García, Karina, Domínguez-Oliva, Adriana, Falcón, Isabel, Casas-Alvarado, Alejandro, Alonso-Spilsbury, María
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
Texto Completo: https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/625
Resumo: The justification for this review article is to understand the position of vegans and those individuals who consume food of animal origin from an unbiased perspective but with a grounding in scientific evidence. This will provide people who eat meat with scientific and ethical arguments to defend their alimentary autonomy in the context of the moral conflict that has emerged in societies regarding the consumption of meat and animal products, which is criticized –sometimes even attacked– by activists, ovolactovegetarians, or vegetarians with alimentary habits that stress ethical and moral respect for animals. These individuals refuse to eat meat and animal products but sometimes show disrespect for those who do. In recent decades, veganism and vegetarianism have reached an apogee in some western societies where they are often considered a healthy option for humans that simultaneously fosters animal and environmental welfare. While those diets may provide numerous benefits, they can also entail health risks by failing to provide balance and necessary dietary supplements. Various researchers concur that they are not appropriate for pregnant women, children, or carnivorous or omnivorous pets. Our review of scientific articles in favor and against dietary regimens that lack protein of animal origin leads to the conclusion that these dietary changes, on their own, do not reduce animal suffering or the contamination generated by the meat, dairy, and poultry industries. Finally, it is important to consider that, despite the popular opinion that vegetarianism and veganism are healthy diet alternatives, the diet must be individualized and well-balanced according to each stage of their life cycle.
id UFERSA-2_360aa8a60e95f4db3139a1b59717a199
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.malque.pub:article/625
network_acronym_str UFERSA-2
network_name_str Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
repository_id_str
spelling Veganism and animal welfare, scientific, ethical, and philosophical argumentsalimentary autonomyanimal sufferingvegetarianismanimal welfaremeat consumptionThe justification for this review article is to understand the position of vegans and those individuals who consume food of animal origin from an unbiased perspective but with a grounding in scientific evidence. This will provide people who eat meat with scientific and ethical arguments to defend their alimentary autonomy in the context of the moral conflict that has emerged in societies regarding the consumption of meat and animal products, which is criticized –sometimes even attacked– by activists, ovolactovegetarians, or vegetarians with alimentary habits that stress ethical and moral respect for animals. These individuals refuse to eat meat and animal products but sometimes show disrespect for those who do. In recent decades, veganism and vegetarianism have reached an apogee in some western societies where they are often considered a healthy option for humans that simultaneously fosters animal and environmental welfare. While those diets may provide numerous benefits, they can also entail health risks by failing to provide balance and necessary dietary supplements. Various researchers concur that they are not appropriate for pregnant women, children, or carnivorous or omnivorous pets. Our review of scientific articles in favor and against dietary regimens that lack protein of animal origin leads to the conclusion that these dietary changes, on their own, do not reduce animal suffering or the contamination generated by the meat, dairy, and poultry industries. Finally, it is important to consider that, despite the popular opinion that vegetarianism and veganism are healthy diet alternatives, the diet must be individualized and well-balanced according to each stage of their life cycle.Malque Publishing2023-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/62510.31893/jabb.23015Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): April; 20230152318-12652318-1265reponame:Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorologyinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/625/417Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorologyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMota-Rojas, DanielWhittaker, Alexandra L.de la Vega, Leonardo ThieloGhezzi, MarceloLezama-García, KarinaDomínguez-Oliva, AdrianaFalcón, IsabelCasas-Alvarado, AlejandroAlonso-Spilsbury, María2023-06-05T17:53:09Zoai:ojs2.malque.pub:article/625Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/jabbPUBhttp://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/revistas/index.php/jabb/oai||souza.jr@ufersa.edu.br2318-12652318-1265opendoar:2023-06-05T17:53:09Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Veganism and animal welfare, scientific, ethical, and philosophical arguments
title Veganism and animal welfare, scientific, ethical, and philosophical arguments
spellingShingle Veganism and animal welfare, scientific, ethical, and philosophical arguments
Mota-Rojas, Daniel
alimentary autonomy
animal suffering
vegetarianism
animal welfare
meat consumption
title_short Veganism and animal welfare, scientific, ethical, and philosophical arguments
title_full Veganism and animal welfare, scientific, ethical, and philosophical arguments
title_fullStr Veganism and animal welfare, scientific, ethical, and philosophical arguments
title_full_unstemmed Veganism and animal welfare, scientific, ethical, and philosophical arguments
title_sort Veganism and animal welfare, scientific, ethical, and philosophical arguments
author Mota-Rojas, Daniel
author_facet Mota-Rojas, Daniel
Whittaker, Alexandra L.
de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo
Ghezzi, Marcelo
Lezama-García, Karina
Domínguez-Oliva, Adriana
Falcón, Isabel
Casas-Alvarado, Alejandro
Alonso-Spilsbury, María
author_role author
author2 Whittaker, Alexandra L.
de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo
Ghezzi, Marcelo
Lezama-García, Karina
Domínguez-Oliva, Adriana
Falcón, Isabel
Casas-Alvarado, Alejandro
Alonso-Spilsbury, María
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mota-Rojas, Daniel
Whittaker, Alexandra L.
de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo
Ghezzi, Marcelo
Lezama-García, Karina
Domínguez-Oliva, Adriana
Falcón, Isabel
Casas-Alvarado, Alejandro
Alonso-Spilsbury, María
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv alimentary autonomy
animal suffering
vegetarianism
animal welfare
meat consumption
topic alimentary autonomy
animal suffering
vegetarianism
animal welfare
meat consumption
description The justification for this review article is to understand the position of vegans and those individuals who consume food of animal origin from an unbiased perspective but with a grounding in scientific evidence. This will provide people who eat meat with scientific and ethical arguments to defend their alimentary autonomy in the context of the moral conflict that has emerged in societies regarding the consumption of meat and animal products, which is criticized –sometimes even attacked– by activists, ovolactovegetarians, or vegetarians with alimentary habits that stress ethical and moral respect for animals. These individuals refuse to eat meat and animal products but sometimes show disrespect for those who do. In recent decades, veganism and vegetarianism have reached an apogee in some western societies where they are often considered a healthy option for humans that simultaneously fosters animal and environmental welfare. While those diets may provide numerous benefits, they can also entail health risks by failing to provide balance and necessary dietary supplements. Various researchers concur that they are not appropriate for pregnant women, children, or carnivorous or omnivorous pets. Our review of scientific articles in favor and against dietary regimens that lack protein of animal origin leads to the conclusion that these dietary changes, on their own, do not reduce animal suffering or the contamination generated by the meat, dairy, and poultry industries. Finally, it is important to consider that, despite the popular opinion that vegetarianism and veganism are healthy diet alternatives, the diet must be individualized and well-balanced according to each stage of their life cycle.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/625
10.31893/jabb.23015
url https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/625
identifier_str_mv 10.31893/jabb.23015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/625/417
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Malque Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Malque Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): April; 2023015
2318-1265
2318-1265
reponame:Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
collection Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||souza.jr@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1799319802654752768