Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology |
Texto Completo: | https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/771 |
Resumo: | Results on appropriate, inappropriate, and painful slaughtering methods of river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) are discussed. Undesirable consequences of poor desensitization and/or slaughtering procedures, causing pain and suffering to animals, are also approached. These considerations are relevant as unsuitable methods can reduce consumer acceptance and commercial value of the meat obtained from animals undergoing deficient slaughtering procedures due to a lack of concern regarding their welfare. Relevant databases –Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed– were searched for this review, including keywords such as pain, slaughter, stunning, Bubalus bubalis, and animal welfare. A detailed description of river buffalo's encephalic anatomy was compared to cattle concerning correct stunning and slaughter methods. The neurobiological processes of pain felt by animals when inadequately desensitized was also examined. Finally, recent findings on stunning methods for buffaloes were discussed, including encephalography. It was concluded that different animal species may require different stunning methods; at the same, time the optimal anatomical site also varies between species. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to train the personnel performing these procedures (transport, stunning, slaughtering) to avoid mishandling that jeopardizes animal welfare by generating stimuli that trigger neurophysiological responses and, in turn, translate into pain during slaughter and reduced meat quality. |
id |
UFERSA-2_e55be07937d56df333a75d4edb37dd75 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.malque.pub:article/771 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA-2 |
network_name_str |
Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)abattoirbuffalo welfarehumane slaughternociceptionpainstunningResults on appropriate, inappropriate, and painful slaughtering methods of river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) are discussed. Undesirable consequences of poor desensitization and/or slaughtering procedures, causing pain and suffering to animals, are also approached. These considerations are relevant as unsuitable methods can reduce consumer acceptance and commercial value of the meat obtained from animals undergoing deficient slaughtering procedures due to a lack of concern regarding their welfare. Relevant databases –Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed– were searched for this review, including keywords such as pain, slaughter, stunning, Bubalus bubalis, and animal welfare. A detailed description of river buffalo's encephalic anatomy was compared to cattle concerning correct stunning and slaughter methods. The neurobiological processes of pain felt by animals when inadequately desensitized was also examined. Finally, recent findings on stunning methods for buffaloes were discussed, including encephalography. It was concluded that different animal species may require different stunning methods; at the same, time the optimal anatomical site also varies between species. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to train the personnel performing these procedures (transport, stunning, slaughtering) to avoid mishandling that jeopardizes animal welfare by generating stimuli that trigger neurophysiological responses and, in turn, translate into pain during slaughter and reduced meat quality.Malque Publishing2021-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/77110.31893/jabb.21015Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): April; 21152318-12652318-1265reponame:Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorologyinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/771/413Copyright (c) 2021 Malque Publishinghttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMota-Rojas, DanielGhezzi, Marcelo DanielNapolitano, FabioRosmini, MarceloGuerrero-Legarreta, IsabelMartínez-Burnes, JulioLezama-García, KarinaMiranda-Cortés, Agathade la Vega, Leonardo ThieloMora-Medina, PatriciaHernández-Ávalos, Ismael2023-05-20T20:21:12Zoai:ojs2.malque.pub:article/771Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/jabbPUBhttp://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/revistas/index.php/jabb/oai||souza.jr@ufersa.edu.br2318-12652318-1265opendoar:2023-05-20T20:21:12Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) |
title |
Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) |
spellingShingle |
Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Mota-Rojas, Daniel abattoir buffalo welfare humane slaughter nociception pain stunning |
title_short |
Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) |
title_full |
Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) |
title_fullStr |
Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) |
title_sort |
Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) |
author |
Mota-Rojas, Daniel |
author_facet |
Mota-Rojas, Daniel Ghezzi, Marcelo Daniel Napolitano, Fabio Rosmini, Marcelo Guerrero-Legarreta, Isabel Martínez-Burnes, Julio Lezama-García, Karina Miranda-Cortés, Agatha de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo Mora-Medina, Patricia Hernández-Ávalos, Ismael |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ghezzi, Marcelo Daniel Napolitano, Fabio Rosmini, Marcelo Guerrero-Legarreta, Isabel Martínez-Burnes, Julio Lezama-García, Karina Miranda-Cortés, Agatha de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo Mora-Medina, Patricia Hernández-Ávalos, Ismael |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mota-Rojas, Daniel Ghezzi, Marcelo Daniel Napolitano, Fabio Rosmini, Marcelo Guerrero-Legarreta, Isabel Martínez-Burnes, Julio Lezama-García, Karina Miranda-Cortés, Agatha de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo Mora-Medina, Patricia Hernández-Ávalos, Ismael |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
abattoir buffalo welfare humane slaughter nociception pain stunning |
topic |
abattoir buffalo welfare humane slaughter nociception pain stunning |
description |
Results on appropriate, inappropriate, and painful slaughtering methods of river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) are discussed. Undesirable consequences of poor desensitization and/or slaughtering procedures, causing pain and suffering to animals, are also approached. These considerations are relevant as unsuitable methods can reduce consumer acceptance and commercial value of the meat obtained from animals undergoing deficient slaughtering procedures due to a lack of concern regarding their welfare. Relevant databases –Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed– were searched for this review, including keywords such as pain, slaughter, stunning, Bubalus bubalis, and animal welfare. A detailed description of river buffalo's encephalic anatomy was compared to cattle concerning correct stunning and slaughter methods. The neurobiological processes of pain felt by animals when inadequately desensitized was also examined. Finally, recent findings on stunning methods for buffaloes were discussed, including encephalography. It was concluded that different animal species may require different stunning methods; at the same, time the optimal anatomical site also varies between species. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to train the personnel performing these procedures (transport, stunning, slaughtering) to avoid mishandling that jeopardizes animal welfare by generating stimuli that trigger neurophysiological responses and, in turn, translate into pain during slaughter and reduced meat quality. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/771 10.31893/jabb.21015 |
url |
https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/771 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31893/jabb.21015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/771/413 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Malque Publishing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Malque Publishing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Malque Publishing |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Malque Publishing |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): April; 2115 2318-1265 2318-1265 reponame:Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology |
collection |
Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||souza.jr@ufersa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799319802688307200 |