Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mota-Rojas, Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ghezzi, Marcelo Daniel, Napolitano, Fabio, Rosmini, Marcelo, Guerrero-Legarreta, Isabel, Martínez-Burnes, Julio, Lezama-García, Karina, Miranda-Cortés, Agatha, de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo, Mora-Medina, Patricia, Hernández-Ávalos, Ismael
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
Texto Completo: https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/771
Resumo: Results on appropriate, inappropriate, and painful slaughtering methods of river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) are discussed. Undesirable consequences of poor desensitization and/or slaughtering procedures, causing pain and suffering to animals, are also approached.  These considerations are relevant as unsuitable methods can reduce consumer acceptance and commercial value of the meat obtained from animals undergoing deficient slaughtering procedures due to a lack of concern regarding their welfare. Relevant databases –Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed– were searched for this review, including keywords such as pain, slaughter, stunning, Bubalus bubalis, and animal welfare. A detailed description of river buffalo's encephalic anatomy was compared to cattle concerning correct stunning and slaughter methods. The neurobiological processes of pain felt by animals when inadequately desensitized was also examined. Finally, recent findings on stunning methods for buffaloes were discussed, including encephalography. It was concluded that different animal species may require different stunning methods; at the same, time the optimal anatomical site also varies between species. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to train the personnel performing these procedures (transport, stunning, slaughtering) to avoid mishandling that jeopardizes animal welfare by generating stimuli that trigger neurophysiological responses and, in turn, translate into pain during slaughter and reduced meat quality.
id UFERSA-2_e55be07937d56df333a75d4edb37dd75
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.malque.pub:article/771
network_acronym_str UFERSA-2
network_name_str Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
repository_id_str
spelling Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)abattoirbuffalo welfarehumane slaughternociceptionpainstunningResults on appropriate, inappropriate, and painful slaughtering methods of river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) are discussed. Undesirable consequences of poor desensitization and/or slaughtering procedures, causing pain and suffering to animals, are also approached.  These considerations are relevant as unsuitable methods can reduce consumer acceptance and commercial value of the meat obtained from animals undergoing deficient slaughtering procedures due to a lack of concern regarding their welfare. Relevant databases –Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed– were searched for this review, including keywords such as pain, slaughter, stunning, Bubalus bubalis, and animal welfare. A detailed description of river buffalo's encephalic anatomy was compared to cattle concerning correct stunning and slaughter methods. The neurobiological processes of pain felt by animals when inadequately desensitized was also examined. Finally, recent findings on stunning methods for buffaloes were discussed, including encephalography. It was concluded that different animal species may require different stunning methods; at the same, time the optimal anatomical site also varies between species. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to train the personnel performing these procedures (transport, stunning, slaughtering) to avoid mishandling that jeopardizes animal welfare by generating stimuli that trigger neurophysiological responses and, in turn, translate into pain during slaughter and reduced meat quality.Malque Publishing2021-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/77110.31893/jabb.21015Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): April; 21152318-12652318-1265reponame:Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorologyinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAenghttps://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/771/413Copyright (c) 2021 Malque Publishinghttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMota-Rojas, DanielGhezzi, Marcelo DanielNapolitano, FabioRosmini, MarceloGuerrero-Legarreta, IsabelMartínez-Burnes, JulioLezama-García, KarinaMiranda-Cortés, Agathade la Vega, Leonardo ThieloMora-Medina, PatriciaHernández-Ávalos, Ismael2023-05-20T20:21:12Zoai:ojs2.malque.pub:article/771Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/jabbPUBhttp://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/revistas/index.php/jabb/oai||souza.jr@ufersa.edu.br2318-12652318-1265opendoar:2023-05-20T20:21:12Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
title Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
spellingShingle Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
Mota-Rojas, Daniel
abattoir
buffalo welfare
humane slaughter
nociception
pain
stunning
title_short Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
title_full Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
title_fullStr Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
title_full_unstemmed Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
title_sort Quality of death in the river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
author Mota-Rojas, Daniel
author_facet Mota-Rojas, Daniel
Ghezzi, Marcelo Daniel
Napolitano, Fabio
Rosmini, Marcelo
Guerrero-Legarreta, Isabel
Martínez-Burnes, Julio
Lezama-García, Karina
Miranda-Cortés, Agatha
de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo
Mora-Medina, Patricia
Hernández-Ávalos, Ismael
author_role author
author2 Ghezzi, Marcelo Daniel
Napolitano, Fabio
Rosmini, Marcelo
Guerrero-Legarreta, Isabel
Martínez-Burnes, Julio
Lezama-García, Karina
Miranda-Cortés, Agatha
de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo
Mora-Medina, Patricia
Hernández-Ávalos, Ismael
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mota-Rojas, Daniel
Ghezzi, Marcelo Daniel
Napolitano, Fabio
Rosmini, Marcelo
Guerrero-Legarreta, Isabel
Martínez-Burnes, Julio
Lezama-García, Karina
Miranda-Cortés, Agatha
de la Vega, Leonardo Thielo
Mora-Medina, Patricia
Hernández-Ávalos, Ismael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv abattoir
buffalo welfare
humane slaughter
nociception
pain
stunning
topic abattoir
buffalo welfare
humane slaughter
nociception
pain
stunning
description Results on appropriate, inappropriate, and painful slaughtering methods of river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) are discussed. Undesirable consequences of poor desensitization and/or slaughtering procedures, causing pain and suffering to animals, are also approached.  These considerations are relevant as unsuitable methods can reduce consumer acceptance and commercial value of the meat obtained from animals undergoing deficient slaughtering procedures due to a lack of concern regarding their welfare. Relevant databases –Scopus, Science Direct, and PubMed– were searched for this review, including keywords such as pain, slaughter, stunning, Bubalus bubalis, and animal welfare. A detailed description of river buffalo's encephalic anatomy was compared to cattle concerning correct stunning and slaughter methods. The neurobiological processes of pain felt by animals when inadequately desensitized was also examined. Finally, recent findings on stunning methods for buffaloes were discussed, including encephalography. It was concluded that different animal species may require different stunning methods; at the same, time the optimal anatomical site also varies between species. Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to train the personnel performing these procedures (transport, stunning, slaughtering) to avoid mishandling that jeopardizes animal welfare by generating stimuli that trigger neurophysiological responses and, in turn, translate into pain during slaughter and reduced meat quality.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/771
10.31893/jabb.21015
url https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/771
identifier_str_mv 10.31893/jabb.21015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/jabb/article/view/771/413
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Malque Publishing
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Malque Publishing
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Malque Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Malque Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): April; 2115
2318-1265
2318-1265
reponame:Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
collection Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||souza.jr@ufersa.edu.br
_version_ 1799319802688307200