THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares Pereira, Paulo Fernando
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9279
Resumo: The article addresses the contributions of history to the understanding of the constitutional meaning of the listing of quilombola heritage, in art. 216, § 5 of the Federal Constitution, taking the controversies between Anthropology and History, concerning the redefinition of quilombos, as a starting point. The listing of all sites with historical reminiscences of the old quilombos constitutes a legal and constitutional command that still lacks enforcement, considering that the historic definition of quilombo is the subject of many criticisms, which understand that the concept, in fact, tries to "refrigerate" the quilombo. Disagreeing with this premise, the article intends to demonstrate that such controversy must be mediated by the Law, based on the reconciliation of the contributions of Anthropology and History to the quilombola cause. In this sense, the contributions of history to the problem of quilombos present them as symbols of black resistance, which was recognized by the Federal Constitution, which made possible, through patrimonial protection, the adding of new elements to the myth of the Nation-State. The methodology used was a critical review of previous research.
id UFERSA_15f3ad86c8429606690f1f4cbf86849c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9279
network_acronym_str UFERSA
network_name_str Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
repository_id_str
spelling THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGEO sentido constitucional do tombamento quilombola: reflexões a partir do diálogo entre Direito e históriaThe article addresses the contributions of history to the understanding of the constitutional meaning of the listing of quilombola heritage, in art. 216, § 5 of the Federal Constitution, taking the controversies between Anthropology and History, concerning the redefinition of quilombos, as a starting point. The listing of all sites with historical reminiscences of the old quilombos constitutes a legal and constitutional command that still lacks enforcement, considering that the historic definition of quilombo is the subject of many criticisms, which understand that the concept, in fact, tries to "refrigerate" the quilombo. Disagreeing with this premise, the article intends to demonstrate that such controversy must be mediated by the Law, based on the reconciliation of the contributions of Anthropology and History to the quilombola cause. In this sense, the contributions of history to the problem of quilombos present them as symbols of black resistance, which was recognized by the Federal Constitution, which made possible, through patrimonial protection, the adding of new elements to the myth of the Nation-State. The methodology used was a critical review of previous research.O artigo aborda as contribuições da História para a compreensão do sentido constitucional do tombamento quilombola previsto no art. 216, § 5º da Constituição Federal, tendo como ponto de partida as controvérsias travadas entre a Antropologia e a História, em torno da ressignificação dos quilombos. O tombamento de todos os sítios com reminiscências históricas dos antigos quilombos constitui uma nomeação jurídica ainda de pouca aplicabilidade no Brasil, tendo em vista que o conceito de quilombo histórico é objeto de muitas críticas, as quais entendem que o conceito, em verdade, tenta "frigorificar" o quilombo. Discordando dessa premissa, pretende-se evidenciar que tal controvérsia deve ser mediada pelo Direito, a partir da conciliação das contribuições da Antropologia e da História para a questão quilombola. Nesse sentido, as contribuições da História para a problemática dos quilombos evidenciam os quilombos como símbolos da resistência negra, os quais tiveram um reconhecimento destacado pela Constituição Federal, a qual possibilitou, através da patrimonialidade, novas narrativas no mito do Estado-Nação. A metodologia consistiu na revisão crítica de literatura.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2020-07-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/927910.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.p138-153.2020UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 4 No. 7 (2020): UFERSA´s Law Review; 138-153Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 4 n. 7 (2020): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 138-1532526-948810.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.2020reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAporhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9279/10264Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica da UFERSAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares Pereira, Paulo Fernando2023-01-18T16:07:42Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9279Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/oairejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br||2526-94882526-9488opendoar:2023-01-18T16:07:42Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE
O sentido constitucional do tombamento quilombola: reflexões a partir do diálogo entre Direito e história
title THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE
spellingShingle THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE
Soares Pereira, Paulo Fernando
title_short THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE
title_full THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE
title_fullStr THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE
title_full_unstemmed THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE
title_sort THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE
author Soares Pereira, Paulo Fernando
author_facet Soares Pereira, Paulo Fernando
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares Pereira, Paulo Fernando
description The article addresses the contributions of history to the understanding of the constitutional meaning of the listing of quilombola heritage, in art. 216, § 5 of the Federal Constitution, taking the controversies between Anthropology and History, concerning the redefinition of quilombos, as a starting point. The listing of all sites with historical reminiscences of the old quilombos constitutes a legal and constitutional command that still lacks enforcement, considering that the historic definition of quilombo is the subject of many criticisms, which understand that the concept, in fact, tries to "refrigerate" the quilombo. Disagreeing with this premise, the article intends to demonstrate that such controversy must be mediated by the Law, based on the reconciliation of the contributions of Anthropology and History to the quilombola cause. In this sense, the contributions of history to the problem of quilombos present them as symbols of black resistance, which was recognized by the Federal Constitution, which made possible, through patrimonial protection, the adding of new elements to the myth of the Nation-State. The methodology used was a critical review of previous research.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9279
10.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.p138-153.2020
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9279
identifier_str_mv 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.p138-153.2020
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9279/10264
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 4 No. 7 (2020): UFERSA´s Law Review; 138-153
Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 4 n. 7 (2020): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 138-153
2526-9488
10.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.2020
reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
collection Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br||
_version_ 1808129613930430464