THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9279 |
Resumo: | The article addresses the contributions of history to the understanding of the constitutional meaning of the listing of quilombola heritage, in art. 216, § 5 of the Federal Constitution, taking the controversies between Anthropology and History, concerning the redefinition of quilombos, as a starting point. The listing of all sites with historical reminiscences of the old quilombos constitutes a legal and constitutional command that still lacks enforcement, considering that the historic definition of quilombo is the subject of many criticisms, which understand that the concept, in fact, tries to "refrigerate" the quilombo. Disagreeing with this premise, the article intends to demonstrate that such controversy must be mediated by the Law, based on the reconciliation of the contributions of Anthropology and History to the quilombola cause. In this sense, the contributions of history to the problem of quilombos present them as symbols of black resistance, which was recognized by the Federal Constitution, which made possible, through patrimonial protection, the adding of new elements to the myth of the Nation-State. The methodology used was a critical review of previous research. |
id |
UFERSA_15f3ad86c8429606690f1f4cbf86849c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9279 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGEO sentido constitucional do tombamento quilombola: reflexões a partir do diálogo entre Direito e históriaThe article addresses the contributions of history to the understanding of the constitutional meaning of the listing of quilombola heritage, in art. 216, § 5 of the Federal Constitution, taking the controversies between Anthropology and History, concerning the redefinition of quilombos, as a starting point. The listing of all sites with historical reminiscences of the old quilombos constitutes a legal and constitutional command that still lacks enforcement, considering that the historic definition of quilombo is the subject of many criticisms, which understand that the concept, in fact, tries to "refrigerate" the quilombo. Disagreeing with this premise, the article intends to demonstrate that such controversy must be mediated by the Law, based on the reconciliation of the contributions of Anthropology and History to the quilombola cause. In this sense, the contributions of history to the problem of quilombos present them as symbols of black resistance, which was recognized by the Federal Constitution, which made possible, through patrimonial protection, the adding of new elements to the myth of the Nation-State. The methodology used was a critical review of previous research.O artigo aborda as contribuições da História para a compreensão do sentido constitucional do tombamento quilombola previsto no art. 216, § 5º da Constituição Federal, tendo como ponto de partida as controvérsias travadas entre a Antropologia e a História, em torno da ressignificação dos quilombos. O tombamento de todos os sítios com reminiscências históricas dos antigos quilombos constitui uma nomeação jurídica ainda de pouca aplicabilidade no Brasil, tendo em vista que o conceito de quilombo histórico é objeto de muitas críticas, as quais entendem que o conceito, em verdade, tenta "frigorificar" o quilombo. Discordando dessa premissa, pretende-se evidenciar que tal controvérsia deve ser mediada pelo Direito, a partir da conciliação das contribuições da Antropologia e da História para a questão quilombola. Nesse sentido, as contribuições da História para a problemática dos quilombos evidenciam os quilombos como símbolos da resistência negra, os quais tiveram um reconhecimento destacado pela Constituição Federal, a qual possibilitou, através da patrimonialidade, novas narrativas no mito do Estado-Nação. A metodologia consistiu na revisão crítica de literatura.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2020-07-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/927910.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.p138-153.2020UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 4 No. 7 (2020): UFERSA´s Law Review; 138-153Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 4 n. 7 (2020): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 138-1532526-948810.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.2020reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAporhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9279/10264Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica da UFERSAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares Pereira, Paulo Fernando2023-01-18T16:07:42Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/9279Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/oairejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br||2526-94882526-9488opendoar:2023-01-18T16:07:42Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE O sentido constitucional do tombamento quilombola: reflexões a partir do diálogo entre Direito e história |
title |
THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE |
spellingShingle |
THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE Soares Pereira, Paulo Fernando |
title_short |
THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE |
title_full |
THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE |
title_fullStr |
THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE |
title_sort |
THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF THE LISTING OF QUILOMBOLA HERITAGE |
author |
Soares Pereira, Paulo Fernando |
author_facet |
Soares Pereira, Paulo Fernando |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soares Pereira, Paulo Fernando |
description |
The article addresses the contributions of history to the understanding of the constitutional meaning of the listing of quilombola heritage, in art. 216, § 5 of the Federal Constitution, taking the controversies between Anthropology and History, concerning the redefinition of quilombos, as a starting point. The listing of all sites with historical reminiscences of the old quilombos constitutes a legal and constitutional command that still lacks enforcement, considering that the historic definition of quilombo is the subject of many criticisms, which understand that the concept, in fact, tries to "refrigerate" the quilombo. Disagreeing with this premise, the article intends to demonstrate that such controversy must be mediated by the Law, based on the reconciliation of the contributions of Anthropology and History to the quilombola cause. In this sense, the contributions of history to the problem of quilombos present them as symbols of black resistance, which was recognized by the Federal Constitution, which made possible, through patrimonial protection, the adding of new elements to the myth of the Nation-State. The methodology used was a critical review of previous research. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9279 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.p138-153.2020 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9279 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.p138-153.2020 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/9279/10264 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 4 No. 7 (2020): UFERSA´s Law Review; 138-153 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 4 n. 7 (2020): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 138-153 2526-9488 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v4.n7.2020 reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersa instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
collection |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br|| |
_version_ |
1808129613930430464 |