Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vogado Correia, Vanessa
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Farranha Santana, Ana Cláudia, Nunes Lopes Espiñeira Lemos, Amanda
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/7694
Resumo: This work aims to analyze the jurisprudence of STF and STJ regarding the right of access to information and environmental information, provided for in Laws 12.527/2011 and 10.650/2003, respectively. How the Brazilian Courts interpret the subject of access to information? What are the main arguments used in these decisions? Methodologically it was a case law search in the STF and in the STJ from search terms, or keywords on the topic and Boolean operators. The institutional cut of the choice of organs arose from the need to study the issue of access to information through the Judiciary, in addition to being superior instances with influence and strength of precedents in our legal system, whose decisions once delivered result in the transit judgment of the action. There were five judgments, which were tabled based on the following categories: origin, resource, destination, parties involved in the dispute and arguments of the decision and subsequent qualitative analysis. It is noticed that the tendency of the judges is to assure the access to the information to the parties that pleaded it. The main reasoning of the judges, in turn, is that the right of access to information needs protection to promote citizenship.
id UFERSA_758349e6acc643f8682f1d2e6d83e90c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7694
network_acronym_str UFERSA
network_name_str Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental informationAnálise das decisões do STF e STJ sobre o direito à informação e informação ambientalThis work aims to analyze the jurisprudence of STF and STJ regarding the right of access to information and environmental information, provided for in Laws 12.527/2011 and 10.650/2003, respectively. How the Brazilian Courts interpret the subject of access to information? What are the main arguments used in these decisions? Methodologically it was a case law search in the STF and in the STJ from search terms, or keywords on the topic and Boolean operators. The institutional cut of the choice of organs arose from the need to study the issue of access to information through the Judiciary, in addition to being superior instances with influence and strength of precedents in our legal system, whose decisions once delivered result in the transit judgment of the action. There were five judgments, which were tabled based on the following categories: origin, resource, destination, parties involved in the dispute and arguments of the decision and subsequent qualitative analysis. It is noticed that the tendency of the judges is to assure the access to the information to the parties that pleaded it. The main reasoning of the judges, in turn, is that the right of access to information needs protection to promote citizenship.Este trabalho objetiva analisar a jurisprudência do STF e do STJ, acerca do direito do acesso à informação e da informação ambiental, previstos nas Leis nºs 12.527/2011 e 10.650/2003, respectivamente. Como as Cortes brasileiras vêm interpretando tema do acesso à informação? Qual (is) principal (is) argumentos utilizados nessas decisões? Metodologicamente tratou-se de uma busca jurisprudencial no STF e no STJ a partir de termos de pesquisa, ou palavras-chave sobre o tema e operadores booleanos. O recorte institucional da escolha dos órgãos surgiu da necessidade de se estudar o tema do acesso à informação pela vertente do Poder Judiciário, além de se tratarem de instâncias superiores com influência e força de precedentes no nosso ordenamento, cujas decisões uma vez proferidas resultam no trânsito em julgado da ação. Encontrou-se cinco acórdãos, os quais passaram por uma sistematização em tabela, baseadas nas seguintes categorias: origem, recurso, destino, partes envolvidas na lide e argumentos da decisão e posterior análise qualitativa. Percebe-se que a tendência dos julgadores é a de assegurar o acesso à informação às partes que o pleiteavam. A principal fundamentação dos julgados, por sua vez, é que o direito de acesso à informação necessita de proteção para promover a cidadania.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/769410.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.p128-140.2018UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): UFERSA's Law Review; 128-140Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 2 n. 4 (2018): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 128-1402526-948810.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.2018reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAporhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/7694/9896Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Jurídica da UFERSAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVogado Correia, VanessaFarranha Santana, Ana CláudiaNunes Lopes Espiñeira Lemos, Amanda2019-01-04T20:07:34Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7694Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/oairejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br||2526-94882526-9488opendoar:2019-01-04T20:07:34Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information
Análise das decisões do STF e STJ sobre o direito à informação e informação ambiental
title Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information
spellingShingle Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information
Vogado Correia, Vanessa
title_short Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information
title_full Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information
title_fullStr Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information
title_sort Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information
author Vogado Correia, Vanessa
author_facet Vogado Correia, Vanessa
Farranha Santana, Ana Cláudia
Nunes Lopes Espiñeira Lemos, Amanda
author_role author
author2 Farranha Santana, Ana Cláudia
Nunes Lopes Espiñeira Lemos, Amanda
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vogado Correia, Vanessa
Farranha Santana, Ana Cláudia
Nunes Lopes Espiñeira Lemos, Amanda
description This work aims to analyze the jurisprudence of STF and STJ regarding the right of access to information and environmental information, provided for in Laws 12.527/2011 and 10.650/2003, respectively. How the Brazilian Courts interpret the subject of access to information? What are the main arguments used in these decisions? Methodologically it was a case law search in the STF and in the STJ from search terms, or keywords on the topic and Boolean operators. The institutional cut of the choice of organs arose from the need to study the issue of access to information through the Judiciary, in addition to being superior instances with influence and strength of precedents in our legal system, whose decisions once delivered result in the transit judgment of the action. There were five judgments, which were tabled based on the following categories: origin, resource, destination, parties involved in the dispute and arguments of the decision and subsequent qualitative analysis. It is noticed that the tendency of the judges is to assure the access to the information to the parties that pleaded it. The main reasoning of the judges, in turn, is that the right of access to information needs protection to promote citizenship.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/7694
10.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.p128-140.2018
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/7694
identifier_str_mv 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.p128-140.2018
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/7694/9896
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): UFERSA's Law Review; 128-140
Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 2 n. 4 (2018): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 128-140
2526-9488
10.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.2018
reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
collection Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br||
_version_ 1808129613875904512