Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/7694 |
Resumo: | This work aims to analyze the jurisprudence of STF and STJ regarding the right of access to information and environmental information, provided for in Laws 12.527/2011 and 10.650/2003, respectively. How the Brazilian Courts interpret the subject of access to information? What are the main arguments used in these decisions? Methodologically it was a case law search in the STF and in the STJ from search terms, or keywords on the topic and Boolean operators. The institutional cut of the choice of organs arose from the need to study the issue of access to information through the Judiciary, in addition to being superior instances with influence and strength of precedents in our legal system, whose decisions once delivered result in the transit judgment of the action. There were five judgments, which were tabled based on the following categories: origin, resource, destination, parties involved in the dispute and arguments of the decision and subsequent qualitative analysis. It is noticed that the tendency of the judges is to assure the access to the information to the parties that pleaded it. The main reasoning of the judges, in turn, is that the right of access to information needs protection to promote citizenship. |
id |
UFERSA_758349e6acc643f8682f1d2e6d83e90c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7694 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental informationAnálise das decisões do STF e STJ sobre o direito à informação e informação ambientalThis work aims to analyze the jurisprudence of STF and STJ regarding the right of access to information and environmental information, provided for in Laws 12.527/2011 and 10.650/2003, respectively. How the Brazilian Courts interpret the subject of access to information? What are the main arguments used in these decisions? Methodologically it was a case law search in the STF and in the STJ from search terms, or keywords on the topic and Boolean operators. The institutional cut of the choice of organs arose from the need to study the issue of access to information through the Judiciary, in addition to being superior instances with influence and strength of precedents in our legal system, whose decisions once delivered result in the transit judgment of the action. There were five judgments, which were tabled based on the following categories: origin, resource, destination, parties involved in the dispute and arguments of the decision and subsequent qualitative analysis. It is noticed that the tendency of the judges is to assure the access to the information to the parties that pleaded it. The main reasoning of the judges, in turn, is that the right of access to information needs protection to promote citizenship.Este trabalho objetiva analisar a jurisprudência do STF e do STJ, acerca do direito do acesso à informação e da informação ambiental, previstos nas Leis nºs 12.527/2011 e 10.650/2003, respectivamente. Como as Cortes brasileiras vêm interpretando tema do acesso à informação? Qual (is) principal (is) argumentos utilizados nessas decisões? Metodologicamente tratou-se de uma busca jurisprudencial no STF e no STJ a partir de termos de pesquisa, ou palavras-chave sobre o tema e operadores booleanos. O recorte institucional da escolha dos órgãos surgiu da necessidade de se estudar o tema do acesso à informação pela vertente do Poder Judiciário, além de se tratarem de instâncias superiores com influência e força de precedentes no nosso ordenamento, cujas decisões uma vez proferidas resultam no trânsito em julgado da ação. Encontrou-se cinco acórdãos, os quais passaram por uma sistematização em tabela, baseadas nas seguintes categorias: origem, recurso, destino, partes envolvidas na lide e argumentos da decisão e posterior análise qualitativa. Percebe-se que a tendência dos julgadores é a de assegurar o acesso à informação às partes que o pleiteavam. A principal fundamentação dos julgados, por sua vez, é que o direito de acesso à informação necessita de proteção para promover a cidadania.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/769410.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.p128-140.2018UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): UFERSA's Law Review; 128-140Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 2 n. 4 (2018): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 128-1402526-948810.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.2018reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAporhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/7694/9896Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Jurídica da UFERSAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVogado Correia, VanessaFarranha Santana, Ana CláudiaNunes Lopes Espiñeira Lemos, Amanda2019-01-04T20:07:34Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/7694Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/oairejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br||2526-94882526-9488opendoar:2019-01-04T20:07:34Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information Análise das decisões do STF e STJ sobre o direito à informação e informação ambiental |
title |
Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information Vogado Correia, Vanessa |
title_short |
Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information |
title_full |
Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information |
title_sort |
Analysis of STF and STJ decisions on the right to information and environmental information |
author |
Vogado Correia, Vanessa |
author_facet |
Vogado Correia, Vanessa Farranha Santana, Ana Cláudia Nunes Lopes Espiñeira Lemos, Amanda |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Farranha Santana, Ana Cláudia Nunes Lopes Espiñeira Lemos, Amanda |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vogado Correia, Vanessa Farranha Santana, Ana Cláudia Nunes Lopes Espiñeira Lemos, Amanda |
description |
This work aims to analyze the jurisprudence of STF and STJ regarding the right of access to information and environmental information, provided for in Laws 12.527/2011 and 10.650/2003, respectively. How the Brazilian Courts interpret the subject of access to information? What are the main arguments used in these decisions? Methodologically it was a case law search in the STF and in the STJ from search terms, or keywords on the topic and Boolean operators. The institutional cut of the choice of organs arose from the need to study the issue of access to information through the Judiciary, in addition to being superior instances with influence and strength of precedents in our legal system, whose decisions once delivered result in the transit judgment of the action. There were five judgments, which were tabled based on the following categories: origin, resource, destination, parties involved in the dispute and arguments of the decision and subsequent qualitative analysis. It is noticed that the tendency of the judges is to assure the access to the information to the parties that pleaded it. The main reasoning of the judges, in turn, is that the right of access to information needs protection to promote citizenship. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/7694 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.p128-140.2018 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/7694 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.p128-140.2018 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/7694/9896 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): UFERSA's Law Review; 128-140 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 2 n. 4 (2018): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 128-140 2526-9488 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.2018 reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersa instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
collection |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br|| |
_version_ |
1808129613875904512 |