Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto, Francisco Rogério Madeira
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/8319
Resumo: This article aims to analyze the reception, in legal circles, of the ideas proposed by Francisco Campos to legitimize the authoritarian government of Getúlio Vargas. For the analysis of Campos's proposals, cynicism was used as an analytical category capable of revealing the strategic use of law for political purposes. It is argued that, at first, the jurist used discursive strategies based on a mythical discourse revealing a cynical way of conceiving the legitimation of power. It is argued that its proposals were not successful among jurists because of the acceptance of a legitimized discourse based not on the force of political myth but on scientific and sociological foundations of a historical and sociological.
id UFERSA_cf093a28c80b6448d0e74ba5902a2d18
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/8319
network_acronym_str UFERSA
network_name_str Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
repository_id_str
spelling Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicismFrancisco Campos e o cinismo constitucionalThis article aims to analyze the reception, in legal circles, of the ideas proposed by Francisco Campos to legitimize the authoritarian government of Getúlio Vargas. For the analysis of Campos's proposals, cynicism was used as an analytical category capable of revealing the strategic use of law for political purposes. It is argued that, at first, the jurist used discursive strategies based on a mythical discourse revealing a cynical way of conceiving the legitimation of power. It is argued that its proposals were not successful among jurists because of the acceptance of a legitimized discourse based not on the force of political myth but on scientific and sociological foundations of a historical and sociological.O presente artigo tem como objetivo analisar a recepção, nos meios jurídicos, das ideias propostas por Francisco Campos para legitimar o governo autoritário de Getúlio Vargas. Para a análise das propostas de Campos utilizou-se o cinismo como uma categoria analítica apta a descortinar o uso estratégico do direito para fins políticos. Argumenta-se que, em um primeiro momento, o jurista utilizou-se de estratégias discursivas baseadas em um discurso mítico reveladoras de um modo cínico de conceber a legitimação do poder. Defende-se que suas propostas não obtiveram sucesso entre os juristas em razão da aceitação de um discurso legitimado, não na força do mito político, mas em fundamentos cientificistas de cunho histórico e sociológico.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/831910.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.p39-66.2018UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): UFERSA's Law Review; 39-66Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 2 n. 4 (2018): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 39-662526-948810.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.2018reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAporhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/8319/9893Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Jurídica da UFERSAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinto, Francisco Rogério Madeira2019-01-04T20:07:34Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/8319Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/oairejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br||2526-94882526-9488opendoar:2019-01-04T20:07:34Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism
Francisco Campos e o cinismo constitucional
title Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism
spellingShingle Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism
Pinto, Francisco Rogério Madeira
title_short Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism
title_full Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism
title_fullStr Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism
title_full_unstemmed Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism
title_sort Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism
author Pinto, Francisco Rogério Madeira
author_facet Pinto, Francisco Rogério Madeira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, Francisco Rogério Madeira
description This article aims to analyze the reception, in legal circles, of the ideas proposed by Francisco Campos to legitimize the authoritarian government of Getúlio Vargas. For the analysis of Campos's proposals, cynicism was used as an analytical category capable of revealing the strategic use of law for political purposes. It is argued that, at first, the jurist used discursive strategies based on a mythical discourse revealing a cynical way of conceiving the legitimation of power. It is argued that its proposals were not successful among jurists because of the acceptance of a legitimized discourse based not on the force of political myth but on scientific and sociological foundations of a historical and sociological.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/8319
10.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.p39-66.2018
url https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/8319
identifier_str_mv 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.p39-66.2018
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/8319/9893
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): UFERSA's Law Review; 39-66
Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 2 n. 4 (2018): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 39-66
2526-9488
10.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.2018
reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron:UFERSA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
instacron_str UFERSA
institution UFERSA
reponame_str Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
collection Revista Jurídica da Ufersa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br||
_version_ 1797067650020409344