Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/8319 |
Resumo: | This article aims to analyze the reception, in legal circles, of the ideas proposed by Francisco Campos to legitimize the authoritarian government of Getúlio Vargas. For the analysis of Campos's proposals, cynicism was used as an analytical category capable of revealing the strategic use of law for political purposes. It is argued that, at first, the jurist used discursive strategies based on a mythical discourse revealing a cynical way of conceiving the legitimation of power. It is argued that its proposals were not successful among jurists because of the acceptance of a legitimized discourse based not on the force of political myth but on scientific and sociological foundations of a historical and sociological. |
id |
UFERSA_cf093a28c80b6448d0e74ba5902a2d18 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/8319 |
network_acronym_str |
UFERSA |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicismFrancisco Campos e o cinismo constitucionalThis article aims to analyze the reception, in legal circles, of the ideas proposed by Francisco Campos to legitimize the authoritarian government of Getúlio Vargas. For the analysis of Campos's proposals, cynicism was used as an analytical category capable of revealing the strategic use of law for political purposes. It is argued that, at first, the jurist used discursive strategies based on a mythical discourse revealing a cynical way of conceiving the legitimation of power. It is argued that its proposals were not successful among jurists because of the acceptance of a legitimized discourse based not on the force of political myth but on scientific and sociological foundations of a historical and sociological.O presente artigo tem como objetivo analisar a recepção, nos meios jurídicos, das ideias propostas por Francisco Campos para legitimar o governo autoritário de Getúlio Vargas. Para a análise das propostas de Campos utilizou-se o cinismo como uma categoria analítica apta a descortinar o uso estratégico do direito para fins políticos. Argumenta-se que, em um primeiro momento, o jurista utilizou-se de estratégias discursivas baseadas em um discurso mítico reveladoras de um modo cínico de conceber a legitimação do poder. Defende-se que suas propostas não obtiveram sucesso entre os juristas em razão da aceitação de um discurso legitimado, não na força do mito político, mas em fundamentos cientificistas de cunho histórico e sociológico.Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido2019-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/831910.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.p39-66.2018UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): UFERSA's Law Review; 39-66Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 2 n. 4 (2018): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 39-662526-948810.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.2018reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersainstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)instacron:UFERSAporhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/8319/9893Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Jurídica da UFERSAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinto, Francisco Rogério Madeira2019-01-04T20:07:34Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufersa.edu.br:article/8319Revistahttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/index.php/rejur/oairejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br||2526-94882526-9488opendoar:2019-01-04T20:07:34Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism Francisco Campos e o cinismo constitucional |
title |
Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism |
spellingShingle |
Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism Pinto, Francisco Rogério Madeira |
title_short |
Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism |
title_full |
Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism |
title_fullStr |
Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism |
title_sort |
Francisco Campos and constitutional cynicism |
author |
Pinto, Francisco Rogério Madeira |
author_facet |
Pinto, Francisco Rogério Madeira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinto, Francisco Rogério Madeira |
description |
This article aims to analyze the reception, in legal circles, of the ideas proposed by Francisco Campos to legitimize the authoritarian government of Getúlio Vargas. For the analysis of Campos's proposals, cynicism was used as an analytical category capable of revealing the strategic use of law for political purposes. It is argued that, at first, the jurist used discursive strategies based on a mythical discourse revealing a cynical way of conceiving the legitimation of power. It is argued that its proposals were not successful among jurists because of the acceptance of a legitimized discourse based not on the force of political myth but on scientific and sociological foundations of a historical and sociological. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/8319 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.p39-66.2018 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/8319 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.p39-66.2018 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/rejur/article/view/8319/9893 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
UFERSA's Law Review; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2018): UFERSA's Law Review; 39-66 Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; v. 2 n. 4 (2018): Revista Jurídica da UFERSA; 39-66 2526-9488 10.21708/issn2526-9488.v2.n4.2018 reponame:Revista Jurídica da Ufersa instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) instacron:UFERSA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
instacron_str |
UFERSA |
institution |
UFERSA |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
collection |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica da Ufersa - Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rejur.direito@ufersa.edu.br|| |
_version_ |
1797067650020409344 |