A negação no português falado em Vitória/ES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nascimento, Cristiana Aparecida Reimann do
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/1465
Resumo: All languages have some way to express verbal denial, but each one has its own strategies for their achievement. In Brazilian Portuguese (BP), there are three strategies of denial: 1) preverbal (No+SV); 2) double denial (No+SV+No) and 3) postverbal (SV+No). In light of Variationist Sociolinguistics and based on the sample PortVix (Portuguese spoken in the City of Vitoria), which has as social parameters gender/sex of the speaker, their age and their level of education, this study examines the variation in the use of structures of denial in Portuguese spoken in the city of Vitoria/ES, in order to place, from this phenomenon, capixaba variety in Brazilian Portuguese. This study is also based upon the proposal of Schwenter (2005) that the three variants alternate only when denied content is activated in speech. Thus, if the proposition denied conveys a status of new information, just preverbal negation can be employed. Thereby, in our research, we seek to understand what factors influence the alternation of forms of denial and verify the linguistic-discursive contexts that bring this variation. When we compared our results with those of other studies, we found that double denial is quite productive in capixaba speech, representing 21.1 % of a total of 2263 data. When performing rounds in which two variants were amalgamated and opposed to one another, were selected by the program Goldvarb X (SANKOFF, TAGLIAMONTE and SMITH, 2005) and, therefore, considered statistically relevant to the double denial the following variables: the dialogical sequences, the absence of negative reinforcement, the absence of conversational markers and complete sentences. For postverbal negation, the following variables were selected: denied propositions directly activated and dialogical sequences. For pre-verbal negation, the statistically significant factors were: narrative and argumentative sequences, the presence of negative reinforcement, the presence of conversational markers, main clauses and male gender. The results revealed that the variation in the use of negative structures is essentially a discursive phenomenon, but this variation is also influenced by some syntactic factors.
id UFES_1262986d9ed2dbe7d7ea9efaf933ecfa
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufes.br:10/1465
network_acronym_str UFES
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
repository_id_str 2108
spelling Yacovenco, Lilian CoutinhoNascimento, Cristiana Aparecida Reimann doSherre, Maria MartaMendes, Ronaldo Mendes2015-08-13T21:41:49Z2016-06-24T06:00:06Z2014-05-162014-05-16All languages have some way to express verbal denial, but each one has its own strategies for their achievement. In Brazilian Portuguese (BP), there are three strategies of denial: 1) preverbal (No+SV); 2) double denial (No+SV+No) and 3) postverbal (SV+No). In light of Variationist Sociolinguistics and based on the sample PortVix (Portuguese spoken in the City of Vitoria), which has as social parameters gender/sex of the speaker, their age and their level of education, this study examines the variation in the use of structures of denial in Portuguese spoken in the city of Vitoria/ES, in order to place, from this phenomenon, capixaba variety in Brazilian Portuguese. This study is also based upon the proposal of Schwenter (2005) that the three variants alternate only when denied content is activated in speech. Thus, if the proposition denied conveys a status of new information, just preverbal negation can be employed. Thereby, in our research, we seek to understand what factors influence the alternation of forms of denial and verify the linguistic-discursive contexts that bring this variation. When we compared our results with those of other studies, we found that double denial is quite productive in capixaba speech, representing 21.1 % of a total of 2263 data. When performing rounds in which two variants were amalgamated and opposed to one another, were selected by the program Goldvarb X (SANKOFF, TAGLIAMONTE and SMITH, 2005) and, therefore, considered statistically relevant to the double denial the following variables: the dialogical sequences, the absence of negative reinforcement, the absence of conversational markers and complete sentences. For postverbal negation, the following variables were selected: denied propositions directly activated and dialogical sequences. For pre-verbal negation, the statistically significant factors were: narrative and argumentative sequences, the presence of negative reinforcement, the presence of conversational markers, main clauses and male gender. The results revealed that the variation in the use of negative structures is essentially a discursive phenomenon, but this variation is also influenced by some syntactic factors.Todas as línguas possuem algum recurso para expressar a negação verbal, porém cada uma apresenta estratégias próprias para sua realização. No português brasileiro (PB), há três estratégias de negação: 1) pré-verbal (Não+SV); 2) dupla negação (Não+SV+Não) e 3) pós-verbal (SV+Não). À luz da Sociolinguística Variacionista e com base na amostra PortVix (Português Falado na Cidade de Vitória), que tem por parâmetros sociais o gênero/sexo do falante, sua faixa etária e seu nível de escolaridade, o presente trabalho analisa a variação no uso das estruturas de negação no português falado na cidade de Vitória/ES, a fim de situar, a partir desse fenômeno, a variedade capixaba no cenário do PB. Também toma por base a proposta de Schwenter (2005) de que as três variantes se alternam apenas quando o conteúdo negado é ativado no discurso. Sendo assim, se a proposição negada apresentar um estatuto de uma informação nova, apenas a negação pré-verbal pode ser empregada. Desse modo, em nossa pesquisa, buscamos entender quais fatores influenciam a alternância das formas de negação e verificar os contextos linguístico-discursivos que comportam essa variação. Ao confrontarmos nossos resultados com os de outras pesquisas, observamos que a dupla negação é bastante produtiva na fala capixaba, representando 21,1% de um total de 2263 dados. Ao realizarmos rodadas em que foram amalgamadas duas variantes e contrapostas a uma outra, foram selecionados pelo programa Goldvarb X (SANKOFF; TAGLIAMONTE; SMITH, 2005) e, portanto, considerados estatisticamente relevantes para a dupla negação, os seguintes fatores: as sequências dialogais, a ausência de reforço negativo, a ausência de marcadores conversacionais e as orações absolutas. Para a negação pós-verbal, foram selecionadas as seguintes variáveis: as proposições negadas diretamente ativadas e as sequências dialogais. Para a negação pré-verbal, os fatores estatisticamente relevantes foram: as sequências narrativas e as argumentativas, a presença de reforço negativo, a presença de marcadores conversacionais, as orações principais e o gênero masculino. Os resultados revelaram que a variação no uso das estruturas negativas é um fenômeno marcadamente discursivo, mas também com atuação de alguns fatores sintáticos.Texthttp://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/1465porUniversidade Federal do Espírito SantoMestrado em Estudos LinguísticosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em LinguísticaUFESBRSociolinguísticaLíngua portuguesa - Português faladoLíngua portuguesa - NegaçãoLíngua portuguesa - VariaçãoLíngua portuguesa - BrasilLinguística80A negação no português falado em Vitória/ESinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)instacron:UFESORIGINALA negação no português falado em Vitória-ES.pdfA negação no português falado em Vitória-ES.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf1244715http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/961b8b59-a36c-46dc-90ea-7fcb92dd344d/download8f2855f0591ecb711aa156a06bae2382MD51CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/e923e3e9-9933-48c7-8a2c-2f6e850cbef8/download4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-818695http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/1eb0ea12-85d1-4825-861d-74e276f303cd/download706fa86f01594bbd4ec888ac35076615MD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-823148http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/195923ae-0704-435e-8ed6-d577749c752b/download9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306MD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/a1ef95ee-05df-4928-acf1-535512707213/download8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD5510/14652024-07-01 20:21:02.766oai:repositorio.ufes.br:10/1465http://repositorio.ufes.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufes.br/oai/requestopendoar:21082024-07-11T14:30:44.671814Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)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
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A negação no português falado em Vitória/ES
title A negação no português falado em Vitória/ES
spellingShingle A negação no português falado em Vitória/ES
Nascimento, Cristiana Aparecida Reimann do
Linguística
Sociolinguística
Língua portuguesa - Português falado
Língua portuguesa - Negação
Língua portuguesa - Variação
Língua portuguesa - Brasil
80
title_short A negação no português falado em Vitória/ES
title_full A negação no português falado em Vitória/ES
title_fullStr A negação no português falado em Vitória/ES
title_full_unstemmed A negação no português falado em Vitória/ES
title_sort A negação no português falado em Vitória/ES
author Nascimento, Cristiana Aparecida Reimann do
author_facet Nascimento, Cristiana Aparecida Reimann do
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Yacovenco, Lilian Coutinho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nascimento, Cristiana Aparecida Reimann do
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Sherre, Maria Marta
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Mendes, Ronaldo Mendes
contributor_str_mv Yacovenco, Lilian Coutinho
Sherre, Maria Marta
Mendes, Ronaldo Mendes
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv Linguística
topic Linguística
Sociolinguística
Língua portuguesa - Português falado
Língua portuguesa - Negação
Língua portuguesa - Variação
Língua portuguesa - Brasil
80
dc.subject.br-rjbn.none.fl_str_mv Sociolinguística
Língua portuguesa - Português falado
Língua portuguesa - Negação
Língua portuguesa - Variação
Língua portuguesa - Brasil
dc.subject.udc.none.fl_str_mv 80
description All languages have some way to express verbal denial, but each one has its own strategies for their achievement. In Brazilian Portuguese (BP), there are three strategies of denial: 1) preverbal (No+SV); 2) double denial (No+SV+No) and 3) postverbal (SV+No). In light of Variationist Sociolinguistics and based on the sample PortVix (Portuguese spoken in the City of Vitoria), which has as social parameters gender/sex of the speaker, their age and their level of education, this study examines the variation in the use of structures of denial in Portuguese spoken in the city of Vitoria/ES, in order to place, from this phenomenon, capixaba variety in Brazilian Portuguese. This study is also based upon the proposal of Schwenter (2005) that the three variants alternate only when denied content is activated in speech. Thus, if the proposition denied conveys a status of new information, just preverbal negation can be employed. Thereby, in our research, we seek to understand what factors influence the alternation of forms of denial and verify the linguistic-discursive contexts that bring this variation. When we compared our results with those of other studies, we found that double denial is quite productive in capixaba speech, representing 21.1 % of a total of 2263 data. When performing rounds in which two variants were amalgamated and opposed to one another, were selected by the program Goldvarb X (SANKOFF, TAGLIAMONTE and SMITH, 2005) and, therefore, considered statistically relevant to the double denial the following variables: the dialogical sequences, the absence of negative reinforcement, the absence of conversational markers and complete sentences. For postverbal negation, the following variables were selected: denied propositions directly activated and dialogical sequences. For pre-verbal negation, the statistically significant factors were: narrative and argumentative sequences, the presence of negative reinforcement, the presence of conversational markers, main clauses and male gender. The results revealed that the variation in the use of negative structures is essentially a discursive phenomenon, but this variation is also influenced by some syntactic factors.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.submitted.none.fl_str_mv 2014-05-16
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014-05-16
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-08-13T21:41:49Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2016-06-24T06:00:06Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/1465
url http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/1465
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv Text
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
Mestrado em Estudos Linguísticos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFES
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
Mestrado em Estudos Linguísticos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
instacron:UFES
instname_str Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
instacron_str UFES
institution UFES
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/961b8b59-a36c-46dc-90ea-7fcb92dd344d/download
http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/e923e3e9-9933-48c7-8a2c-2f6e850cbef8/download
http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/1eb0ea12-85d1-4825-861d-74e276f303cd/download
http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/195923ae-0704-435e-8ed6-d577749c752b/download
http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/a1ef95ee-05df-4928-acf1-535512707213/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8f2855f0591ecb711aa156a06bae2382
4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f
706fa86f01594bbd4ec888ac35076615
9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1813022602428416000