Influências das características ambientais adversas na escolha da abordagem de implementação e no sucesso de projetos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moura, Ralf Luis de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/13219
Resumo: The high index of projects that cannot reach the goals and results previously established is a persistent challenge in the project management area. To minimize these challenges, organizations adopt and institutionalize project management methodologies that generalize their application, based on the assumption that a single way can help achieve results in any situation. Most of the methodologies defend that it is only possible to achieve excellence in project management through rigid planning, based on rationalization and application of methods with logical rigor and objectivity, which leads to the application of a prescriptive approach in the project implementation. However, not all projects are the same and some of these, depending on the environment in which they are inserted, may require an adaptive approach. The adverse environmental characteristics represented by the elements: dynamism, uncertainty, technical diversity and ambiguity can influence the success of the project both, in relation to the achievement of established goals and satisfaction with project results. The objective of this study was to propose and test a project classification model that indicates the implementation approach more adjusted to the project adverse environmental characteristics with the capacity to provide a greater probability of success. For such, through an empirical research with 332 professionals involved in projects, this study proposed a structural model that was validated and tested. By means of their causal relationships’ significance, a classification model was created to indicate the implementation approach with greater probability of success, according to the project dominant environmental characteristic. Results showed that, contrary to many studies, not all the projects in which the characteristics derived from the environment are more present tend to be more likely to succeed when adopting adaptive approaches, in addition, not all projects with lower environmental influences tend to perform better when they adopt prescriptive approaches. What denotes that it is necessary to previously understand the environmental context to which the project is inserted and from this understanding opt for the implementation approach with greater chances of success. Showing evidence that a single way is not able to address all types of projects (one size does not fit all).
id UFES_bb357ed1ebd6053444e74ecb93bc7a4c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufes.br:10/13219
network_acronym_str UFES
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
repository_id_str 2108
spelling Carneiro, Teresa Cristina Janeshttps://orcid.org/0000000199871460http://lattes.cnpq.br/3412619629209873Moura, Ralf Luis dehttps://orcid.org/0000000201704056http://lattes.cnpq.br/4393935230634143Russo, Rosaria de Fatima Segger Macrihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3579-4168http://lattes.cnpq.br/2521059777840892Dias, Taciana de Lemoshttps://orcid.org/0000000271721230http://lattes.cnpq.br/0535178144031059Pascuci, Lucilaine Mariahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-6129http://lattes.cnpq.br/5674113274785826Oliveira, Marcos Paulo Valadares dehttps://orcid.org/0000000326465247http://lattes.cnpq.br/30696784385814112024-05-29T22:10:42Z2024-05-29T22:10:42Z2019-05-08The high index of projects that cannot reach the goals and results previously established is a persistent challenge in the project management area. To minimize these challenges, organizations adopt and institutionalize project management methodologies that generalize their application, based on the assumption that a single way can help achieve results in any situation. Most of the methodologies defend that it is only possible to achieve excellence in project management through rigid planning, based on rationalization and application of methods with logical rigor and objectivity, which leads to the application of a prescriptive approach in the project implementation. However, not all projects are the same and some of these, depending on the environment in which they are inserted, may require an adaptive approach. The adverse environmental characteristics represented by the elements: dynamism, uncertainty, technical diversity and ambiguity can influence the success of the project both, in relation to the achievement of established goals and satisfaction with project results. The objective of this study was to propose and test a project classification model that indicates the implementation approach more adjusted to the project adverse environmental characteristics with the capacity to provide a greater probability of success. For such, through an empirical research with 332 professionals involved in projects, this study proposed a structural model that was validated and tested. By means of their causal relationships’ significance, a classification model was created to indicate the implementation approach with greater probability of success, according to the project dominant environmental characteristic. Results showed that, contrary to many studies, not all the projects in which the characteristics derived from the environment are more present tend to be more likely to succeed when adopting adaptive approaches, in addition, not all projects with lower environmental influences tend to perform better when they adopt prescriptive approaches. What denotes that it is necessary to previously understand the environmental context to which the project is inserted and from this understanding opt for the implementation approach with greater chances of success. Showing evidence that a single way is not able to address all types of projects (one size does not fit all).O alto índice de projetos que não conseguem atingir as metas e resultados previamente estabelecidos é um desafio persistente na área de gestão de projetos. Para minimizar estes desafios, as organizações adotam metodologias de gestão de projetos que se sustentam no pressuposto de que um único meio é capaz de ajudar no alcance dos resultados em quaisquer situações (one size fits all). Grande parte das metodologias defendem que somente é possível atingir a excelência na gestão de projetos por meio do planejamento rígido, baseado na aplicação de métodos dotados de rigor lógico e objetividade, o que direciona à aplicação de uma abordagem prescritiva na implementação dos projetos. Entretanto, nem todos os projetos são iguais e alguns destes, em função do ambiente em que estão inseridos, podem depender de uma abordagem adaptativa para alcançar o sucesso, pois as características ambientais adversas do projeto representadas pelos elementos: dinamicidade, incerteza, diversidade técnica e ambiguidade podem influenciar seu sucesso tanto em relação ao alcance das metas estabelecidas quanto à satisfação com os resultados do projeto. Por meio de um arcabouço teórico, este estudo teve por objetivo propor e testar um modelo de classificação de projetos que indica a abordagem de implementação mais ajustada às características ambientais adversas do projeto com capacidade de propiciar maior probabilidade de sucesso. Para tal, por intermédio de uma pesquisa empírica com 332 profissionais envolvidos em projetos, este estudo propôs um modelo estrutural que foi validado e testado. A partir dos resultados do modelo testado, criou-se um modelo de classificação de projetos que permitiu a indicação da abordagem de implementação com maior probabilidade de auxiliar o projeto a alcançar o sucesso. Os resultados mostraram que, contrapondo o que afirmam muitos estudos, nem todos os projetos no qual as características ambientais adversas têm grande influência, têm maior probabilidade de sucesso quando adotam abordagens adaptativas. Ademais, nem todos os projetos em que as influências ambientais têm baixa influência tendem a apresentar melhores resultados quando adotam abordagens prescritivas. O que denota que é necessário entender previamente o contexto ambiental ao qual o projeto está inserido e a partir deste entendimento optar pela abordagem de implementação com maiores chances de sucesso. Mostrando evidências de que um único meio não é capaz de endereçar todos os tipos de projetos (one size does not fit all).Texthttp://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/13219porUniversidade Federal do Espírito SantoDoutorado em AdministraçãoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em AdministraçãoUFESBRCentro de Ciências Jurídicas e Econômicassubject.br-rjbnAdministraçãoGestão de projetosCaracterísticas ambientais adversasSucessoAbordagem de implementaçãoProject managementAdverse environmental characteristicsSuccessImplementation approachInfluências das características ambientais adversas na escolha da abordagem de implementação e no sucesso de projetostitle.alternativeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)instacron:UFESORIGINALTese - Ralf Moura(2019).pdfapplication/pdf3863988http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/fbbda3ee-51a6-40a1-bb41-f28725cdad72/download97e6a7790d236751a946077ef330033aMD5110/132192024-08-27 14:07:35.922oai:repositorio.ufes.br:10/13219http://repositorio.ufes.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufes.br/oai/requestopendoar:21082024-10-15T17:53:13.447832Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influências das características ambientais adversas na escolha da abordagem de implementação e no sucesso de projetos
dc.title.alternative.none.fl_str_mv title.alternative
title Influências das características ambientais adversas na escolha da abordagem de implementação e no sucesso de projetos
spellingShingle Influências das características ambientais adversas na escolha da abordagem de implementação e no sucesso de projetos
Moura, Ralf Luis de
Administração
Gestão de projetos
Características ambientais adversas
Sucesso
Abordagem de implementação
Project management
Adverse environmental characteristics
Success
Implementation approach
subject.br-rjbn
title_short Influências das características ambientais adversas na escolha da abordagem de implementação e no sucesso de projetos
title_full Influências das características ambientais adversas na escolha da abordagem de implementação e no sucesso de projetos
title_fullStr Influências das características ambientais adversas na escolha da abordagem de implementação e no sucesso de projetos
title_full_unstemmed Influências das características ambientais adversas na escolha da abordagem de implementação e no sucesso de projetos
title_sort Influências das características ambientais adversas na escolha da abordagem de implementação e no sucesso de projetos
author Moura, Ralf Luis de
author_facet Moura, Ralf Luis de
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorID.none.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000000201704056
dc.contributor.authorLattes.none.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4393935230634143
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Carneiro, Teresa Cristina Janes
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000000199871460
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3412619629209873
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moura, Ralf Luis de
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Russo, Rosaria de Fatima Segger Macri
dc.contributor.referee1ID.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3579-4168
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2521059777840892
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Dias, Taciana de Lemos
dc.contributor.referee2ID.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000000271721230
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0535178144031059
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Pascuci, Lucilaine Maria
dc.contributor.referee3ID.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-6129
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5674113274785826
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Marcos Paulo Valadares de
dc.contributor.referee4ID.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000000326465247
dc.contributor.referee4Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3069678438581411
contributor_str_mv Carneiro, Teresa Cristina Janes
Russo, Rosaria de Fatima Segger Macri
Dias, Taciana de Lemos
Pascuci, Lucilaine Maria
Oliveira, Marcos Paulo Valadares de
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv Administração
topic Administração
Gestão de projetos
Características ambientais adversas
Sucesso
Abordagem de implementação
Project management
Adverse environmental characteristics
Success
Implementation approach
subject.br-rjbn
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gestão de projetos
Características ambientais adversas
Sucesso
Abordagem de implementação
Project management
Adverse environmental characteristics
Success
Implementation approach
dc.subject.br-rjbn.none.fl_str_mv subject.br-rjbn
description The high index of projects that cannot reach the goals and results previously established is a persistent challenge in the project management area. To minimize these challenges, organizations adopt and institutionalize project management methodologies that generalize their application, based on the assumption that a single way can help achieve results in any situation. Most of the methodologies defend that it is only possible to achieve excellence in project management through rigid planning, based on rationalization and application of methods with logical rigor and objectivity, which leads to the application of a prescriptive approach in the project implementation. However, not all projects are the same and some of these, depending on the environment in which they are inserted, may require an adaptive approach. The adverse environmental characteristics represented by the elements: dynamism, uncertainty, technical diversity and ambiguity can influence the success of the project both, in relation to the achievement of established goals and satisfaction with project results. The objective of this study was to propose and test a project classification model that indicates the implementation approach more adjusted to the project adverse environmental characteristics with the capacity to provide a greater probability of success. For such, through an empirical research with 332 professionals involved in projects, this study proposed a structural model that was validated and tested. By means of their causal relationships’ significance, a classification model was created to indicate the implementation approach with greater probability of success, according to the project dominant environmental characteristic. Results showed that, contrary to many studies, not all the projects in which the characteristics derived from the environment are more present tend to be more likely to succeed when adopting adaptive approaches, in addition, not all projects with lower environmental influences tend to perform better when they adopt prescriptive approaches. What denotes that it is necessary to previously understand the environmental context to which the project is inserted and from this understanding opt for the implementation approach with greater chances of success. Showing evidence that a single way is not able to address all types of projects (one size does not fit all).
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-05-08
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2024-05-29T22:10:42Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2024-05-29T22:10:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/13219
url http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/13219
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv Text
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
Doutorado em Administração
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFES
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Centro de Ciências Jurídicas e Econômicas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
Doutorado em Administração
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
instname:Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
instacron:UFES
instname_str Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
instacron_str UFES
institution UFES
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
collection Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstreams/fbbda3ee-51a6-40a1-bb41-f28725cdad72/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 97e6a7790d236751a946077ef330033a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes) - Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1813022513127489536