Diagnóstico sorológico da paracoccidioidomicose : comparação entre os testes de Imunodifusão Dupla (IDD) e Ensaio Imunoenzimático (ELISA)

• Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Aline Lyra
• Data de Publicação: 2012
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (riUfes)
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/5958
• topic: Paracoccidioidomycosis; Serodiagnosis; Antibody titers; Double immunodiffusion (IDD); Enzyme immunoassay (ELISA); Paracoccidioidomicose; Diagnóstico sorológico; Títulos de anticorpo; Imunodifusão dupla (IDD); Ensaio imunoenzimático (ELISA); Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias; 61

Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) is a systemic mycosis caused by the dimorphic fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. It is among the most common fungal infections in Latin America, with Brazil being the country of highest endemicity, mainly in the Southeast part. The diagnosis considered by many authors as gold standard for the PCM is the finding of suggestive yeast cells of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in the Direct Microscopic Examination of sputum or other clinical specimens, such as scraping the lesion, lymph node aspirate, biopsy, etc. The serological tests are of great importance, since they complement or replace the mycological examination in the diagnosis / prognosis of the disease. The aim of this study was to compare two serological tests for PCM: a double immunodiffusion (IDD) and Enzyme-Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay (ELISA). The methodology was established by comparing antibody titers obtained from three groups of patients: 145 serum samples from 83 patients with PCM (Group I), 49 healthy blood donors (Group II) and 13 patients with IDD positive for other pulmonary mycoses: 11 with histoplasmosis and 2 with aspergillosis (Group III). Our results showed that eight (9.6%) and 5 (6.0%) of patients with PCM were false negative to the IDD and ELISA tests, respectively. In the group of healthy patients, no cases of false positive in IDD were observed; however, 5 (10.2%) of samples were positive with low titers in ELISA. Among the 13 patients with other mycoses, the ELISA showed that 10 (77.0%) were positive while the IDD tests did not show any case of cross-reaction. The sensitivity of the ELISA (93.9%) was slightly higher than the IDD (90.3%). The specificity of the ELISA calculated basing on the healthy control and patients with other mycoses was 89.7% and 23.1%, respectively. IDD showed 100% of specificity for both cases. The positive predictive and negative predictive values were 100% and 83.8% for IDD and 88.5% and 90.3% for ELISA, respectively. The accuracy of the tests was also calculated: the IDD was 94.4% while ELISA was 86.2%.