Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bridi, Cassiano Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Costa, Carlos Alberto, dos Reis, Zaida Cristiane
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Sistemas & Gestão
Texto Completo: https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380
Resumo: Choosing a Production Planning and Control (Planejamento e Controle da Produção – PCP) technique that is aligned with and is appropriate to a company's production environment scenario is considered a crucial factor in its strategy. Such a choice may reflect on how the company manages its timing, inventory, and, consequently, its costs. This study proposes an instrument to evaluate the adherence between the focus and practices of PCP in companies. Six PCP techniques were considered within the scope of work in four production environments: Assemble to Order, Make to Stock, Engineer to Order, and Make to Order. The selected techniques were based on the work of Stevenson, Hendry and Kingsman (2005), and they three classic techniques – Material Requirements Planning, Drum Buffer Rope and Kanban and three emerging – Constant Work in Process, Workload Control and Paired cell Overlapping Loops of Cards with Authorization. Two different perspectives within a company were considered: the one of management and the one of operation, for the analysis, with questions addressing the relations between the techniques and the production environments. The research instrument was developed based on sensitive parameters, to a greater or lesser degree, to the use of each of the techniques in each company. A multiple case study with eight companies from the metalworking segment aligned with the four production environments located in the Serra Gaúcha was carried out. We interviewed managers, who established the focus of the PCP in each company, and PCP and operation specialists, who informed the practices of the production environment. The use of the research instrument was adequate, making it possible to capture the essence of the company's PCP activities. The results show that some techniques have greater compatibility with certain production environments, while others still deserve a finer adjustment.
id UFF-13_a43f7653c493d52fcfc5fb56f80628a6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.revistasg.uff.br:article/1380
network_acronym_str UFF-13
network_name_str Sistemas & Gestão
repository_id_str
spelling Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do SulProposta de um instrumento para verificação da aderência entre o foco e a prática do Planejamento e Controle da Produção: um estudo no segmento metalmecânico da serra gaúchaProduction Planning and Control TechniquesProduction environmentAdherenceFocus and Practice of Production Planning and Control.Técnicas de Planejamento e Controle da ProduçãoAmbiente de produçãoAderênciaFoco e Prática do PlanejamentoControle da Produção.Choosing a Production Planning and Control (Planejamento e Controle da Produção – PCP) technique that is aligned with and is appropriate to a company's production environment scenario is considered a crucial factor in its strategy. Such a choice may reflect on how the company manages its timing, inventory, and, consequently, its costs. This study proposes an instrument to evaluate the adherence between the focus and practices of PCP in companies. Six PCP techniques were considered within the scope of work in four production environments: Assemble to Order, Make to Stock, Engineer to Order, and Make to Order. The selected techniques were based on the work of Stevenson, Hendry and Kingsman (2005), and they three classic techniques – Material Requirements Planning, Drum Buffer Rope and Kanban and three emerging – Constant Work in Process, Workload Control and Paired cell Overlapping Loops of Cards with Authorization. Two different perspectives within a company were considered: the one of management and the one of operation, for the analysis, with questions addressing the relations between the techniques and the production environments. The research instrument was developed based on sensitive parameters, to a greater or lesser degree, to the use of each of the techniques in each company. A multiple case study with eight companies from the metalworking segment aligned with the four production environments located in the Serra Gaúcha was carried out. We interviewed managers, who established the focus of the PCP in each company, and PCP and operation specialists, who informed the practices of the production environment. The use of the research instrument was adequate, making it possible to capture the essence of the company's PCP activities. The results show that some techniques have greater compatibility with certain production environments, while others still deserve a finer adjustment.A escolha por uma técnica de Planejamento e Controle da Produção (PCP) alinhada e adequada com o cenário de ambiente de produção de uma empresa é considerado um fator crucial para a sua estratégia. Tal escolha poderá refletir na forma como a empresa gerencia seus prazos, estoques e, consequentemente, seus custos. Este estudo propõe um instrumento para avaliação da aderência entre o foco e as práticas de PCP em empresas. Foram considerados dentro do escopo do trabalho seis técnicas de PCP dentro de quatro ambientes de produção: Assemble To Order, Make To Stock, Engineer To Order e Make To Order. As técnicas selecionadas foram baseadas no trabalho de Stevenson, Hendry e Kingsman (2005) sendo três clássicas – Material Requirements Planning, Drum Buffer Rope e Kanban e três emergentes – Constant Work in Process, Workload Control e Paired cell Overlapping Loops of Cards with Authorization. Foram consideradas duas diferentes perspectivas dentro de uma empresa: a de gestão e a de operação, para a análise, com questões abordando as relações entre as técnicas e os ambientes de produção. O instrumento de pesquisa foi elaborado com base em parâmetros sensíveis, em maior ou menor grau, à utilização de cada uma das técnicas em cada empresa. Um estudo de caso múltiplo com oito empresas do segmento metalmecânico alinhadas com os quatro ambientes de produção e localizadas na Serra Gaúcha foi realizado. Foram entrevistados gestores, que estabeleceram o foco do PCP em cada empresa, e especialistas de PCP e operação, que informaram as práticas do ambiente de produção. O uso do instrumento de pesquisa se mostrou adequado, tornando possível captar a essência das atividades de PCP da empresa. Os resultados mostram que algumas técnicas possuem maior compatibilidade com determinados ambientes de produção, enquanto outras ainda merecem um ajuste mais fino.ABEC2018-09-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/othertext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/138010.20985/1980-5160.2018.v13n3.1380Sistemas & Gestão; v. 13 n. 3 (2018): SETEMBRO 2018; 334-3441980-516010.20985/1980-5160.2018.v13n3reponame:Sistemas & Gestãoinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporenghttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/htmlhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/html_1https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/pdfhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2018 Sistemas & Gestãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBridi, Cassiano DanielCosta, Carlos Albertodos Reis, Zaida Cristiane2020-05-29T17:19:00Zoai:ojs.www.revistasg.uff.br:article/1380Revistahttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sgPUBhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/oai||sg.revista@gmail.com|| periodicos@proppi.uff.br1980-51601980-5160opendoar:2020-05-29T17:19Sistemas & Gestão - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul
Proposta de um instrumento para verificação da aderência entre o foco e a prática do Planejamento e Controle da Produção: um estudo no segmento metalmecânico da serra gaúcha
title Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul
spellingShingle Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul
Bridi, Cassiano Daniel
Production Planning and Control Techniques
Production environment
Adherence
Focus and Practice of Production Planning and Control.
Técnicas de Planejamento e Controle da Produção
Ambiente de produção
Aderência
Foco e Prática do Planejamento
Controle da Produção.
title_short Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul
title_full Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul
title_fullStr Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul
title_full_unstemmed Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul
title_sort Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul
author Bridi, Cassiano Daniel
author_facet Bridi, Cassiano Daniel
Costa, Carlos Alberto
dos Reis, Zaida Cristiane
author_role author
author2 Costa, Carlos Alberto
dos Reis, Zaida Cristiane
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bridi, Cassiano Daniel
Costa, Carlos Alberto
dos Reis, Zaida Cristiane
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Production Planning and Control Techniques
Production environment
Adherence
Focus and Practice of Production Planning and Control.
Técnicas de Planejamento e Controle da Produção
Ambiente de produção
Aderência
Foco e Prática do Planejamento
Controle da Produção.
topic Production Planning and Control Techniques
Production environment
Adherence
Focus and Practice of Production Planning and Control.
Técnicas de Planejamento e Controle da Produção
Ambiente de produção
Aderência
Foco e Prática do Planejamento
Controle da Produção.
description Choosing a Production Planning and Control (Planejamento e Controle da Produção – PCP) technique that is aligned with and is appropriate to a company's production environment scenario is considered a crucial factor in its strategy. Such a choice may reflect on how the company manages its timing, inventory, and, consequently, its costs. This study proposes an instrument to evaluate the adherence between the focus and practices of PCP in companies. Six PCP techniques were considered within the scope of work in four production environments: Assemble to Order, Make to Stock, Engineer to Order, and Make to Order. The selected techniques were based on the work of Stevenson, Hendry and Kingsman (2005), and they three classic techniques – Material Requirements Planning, Drum Buffer Rope and Kanban and three emerging – Constant Work in Process, Workload Control and Paired cell Overlapping Loops of Cards with Authorization. Two different perspectives within a company were considered: the one of management and the one of operation, for the analysis, with questions addressing the relations between the techniques and the production environments. The research instrument was developed based on sensitive parameters, to a greater or lesser degree, to the use of each of the techniques in each company. A multiple case study with eight companies from the metalworking segment aligned with the four production environments located in the Serra Gaúcha was carried out. We interviewed managers, who established the focus of the PCP in each company, and PCP and operation specialists, who informed the practices of the production environment. The use of the research instrument was adequate, making it possible to capture the essence of the company's PCP activities. The results show that some techniques have greater compatibility with certain production environments, while others still deserve a finer adjustment.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380
10.20985/1980-5160.2018.v13n3.1380
url https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380
identifier_str_mv 10.20985/1980-5160.2018.v13n3.1380
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/html
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/html_1
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/pdf
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/pdf_1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Sistemas & Gestão
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Sistemas & Gestão
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
text/html
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABEC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sistemas & Gestão; v. 13 n. 3 (2018): SETEMBRO 2018; 334-344
1980-5160
10.20985/1980-5160.2018.v13n3
reponame:Sistemas & Gestão
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Sistemas & Gestão
collection Sistemas & Gestão
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sistemas & Gestão - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sg.revista@gmail.com|| periodicos@proppi.uff.br
_version_ 1798320144521363456