Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Sistemas & Gestão |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380 |
Resumo: | Choosing a Production Planning and Control (Planejamento e Controle da Produção – PCP) technique that is aligned with and is appropriate to a company's production environment scenario is considered a crucial factor in its strategy. Such a choice may reflect on how the company manages its timing, inventory, and, consequently, its costs. This study proposes an instrument to evaluate the adherence between the focus and practices of PCP in companies. Six PCP techniques were considered within the scope of work in four production environments: Assemble to Order, Make to Stock, Engineer to Order, and Make to Order. The selected techniques were based on the work of Stevenson, Hendry and Kingsman (2005), and they three classic techniques – Material Requirements Planning, Drum Buffer Rope and Kanban and three emerging – Constant Work in Process, Workload Control and Paired cell Overlapping Loops of Cards with Authorization. Two different perspectives within a company were considered: the one of management and the one of operation, for the analysis, with questions addressing the relations between the techniques and the production environments. The research instrument was developed based on sensitive parameters, to a greater or lesser degree, to the use of each of the techniques in each company. A multiple case study with eight companies from the metalworking segment aligned with the four production environments located in the Serra Gaúcha was carried out. We interviewed managers, who established the focus of the PCP in each company, and PCP and operation specialists, who informed the practices of the production environment. The use of the research instrument was adequate, making it possible to capture the essence of the company's PCP activities. The results show that some techniques have greater compatibility with certain production environments, while others still deserve a finer adjustment. |
id |
UFF-13_a43f7653c493d52fcfc5fb56f80628a6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.revistasg.uff.br:article/1380 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-13 |
network_name_str |
Sistemas & Gestão |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do SulProposta de um instrumento para verificação da aderência entre o foco e a prática do Planejamento e Controle da Produção: um estudo no segmento metalmecânico da serra gaúchaProduction Planning and Control TechniquesProduction environmentAdherenceFocus and Practice of Production Planning and Control.Técnicas de Planejamento e Controle da ProduçãoAmbiente de produçãoAderênciaFoco e Prática do PlanejamentoControle da Produção.Choosing a Production Planning and Control (Planejamento e Controle da Produção – PCP) technique that is aligned with and is appropriate to a company's production environment scenario is considered a crucial factor in its strategy. Such a choice may reflect on how the company manages its timing, inventory, and, consequently, its costs. This study proposes an instrument to evaluate the adherence between the focus and practices of PCP in companies. Six PCP techniques were considered within the scope of work in four production environments: Assemble to Order, Make to Stock, Engineer to Order, and Make to Order. The selected techniques were based on the work of Stevenson, Hendry and Kingsman (2005), and they three classic techniques – Material Requirements Planning, Drum Buffer Rope and Kanban and three emerging – Constant Work in Process, Workload Control and Paired cell Overlapping Loops of Cards with Authorization. Two different perspectives within a company were considered: the one of management and the one of operation, for the analysis, with questions addressing the relations between the techniques and the production environments. The research instrument was developed based on sensitive parameters, to a greater or lesser degree, to the use of each of the techniques in each company. A multiple case study with eight companies from the metalworking segment aligned with the four production environments located in the Serra Gaúcha was carried out. We interviewed managers, who established the focus of the PCP in each company, and PCP and operation specialists, who informed the practices of the production environment. The use of the research instrument was adequate, making it possible to capture the essence of the company's PCP activities. The results show that some techniques have greater compatibility with certain production environments, while others still deserve a finer adjustment.A escolha por uma técnica de Planejamento e Controle da Produção (PCP) alinhada e adequada com o cenário de ambiente de produção de uma empresa é considerado um fator crucial para a sua estratégia. Tal escolha poderá refletir na forma como a empresa gerencia seus prazos, estoques e, consequentemente, seus custos. Este estudo propõe um instrumento para avaliação da aderência entre o foco e as práticas de PCP em empresas. Foram considerados dentro do escopo do trabalho seis técnicas de PCP dentro de quatro ambientes de produção: Assemble To Order, Make To Stock, Engineer To Order e Make To Order. As técnicas selecionadas foram baseadas no trabalho de Stevenson, Hendry e Kingsman (2005) sendo três clássicas – Material Requirements Planning, Drum Buffer Rope e Kanban e três emergentes – Constant Work in Process, Workload Control e Paired cell Overlapping Loops of Cards with Authorization. Foram consideradas duas diferentes perspectivas dentro de uma empresa: a de gestão e a de operação, para a análise, com questões abordando as relações entre as técnicas e os ambientes de produção. O instrumento de pesquisa foi elaborado com base em parâmetros sensíveis, em maior ou menor grau, à utilização de cada uma das técnicas em cada empresa. Um estudo de caso múltiplo com oito empresas do segmento metalmecânico alinhadas com os quatro ambientes de produção e localizadas na Serra Gaúcha foi realizado. Foram entrevistados gestores, que estabeleceram o foco do PCP em cada empresa, e especialistas de PCP e operação, que informaram as práticas do ambiente de produção. O uso do instrumento de pesquisa se mostrou adequado, tornando possível captar a essência das atividades de PCP da empresa. Os resultados mostram que algumas técnicas possuem maior compatibilidade com determinados ambientes de produção, enquanto outras ainda merecem um ajuste mais fino.ABEC2018-09-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/othertext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/138010.20985/1980-5160.2018.v13n3.1380Sistemas & Gestão; v. 13 n. 3 (2018): SETEMBRO 2018; 334-3441980-516010.20985/1980-5160.2018.v13n3reponame:Sistemas & Gestãoinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporenghttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/htmlhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/html_1https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/pdfhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2018 Sistemas & Gestãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBridi, Cassiano DanielCosta, Carlos Albertodos Reis, Zaida Cristiane2020-05-29T17:19:00Zoai:ojs.www.revistasg.uff.br:article/1380Revistahttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sgPUBhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/oai||sg.revista@gmail.com|| periodicos@proppi.uff.br1980-51601980-5160opendoar:2020-05-29T17:19Sistemas & Gestão - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul Proposta de um instrumento para verificação da aderência entre o foco e a prática do Planejamento e Controle da Produção: um estudo no segmento metalmecânico da serra gaúcha |
title |
Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul |
spellingShingle |
Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul Bridi, Cassiano Daniel Production Planning and Control Techniques Production environment Adherence Focus and Practice of Production Planning and Control. Técnicas de Planejamento e Controle da Produção Ambiente de produção Aderência Foco e Prática do Planejamento Controle da Produção. |
title_short |
Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul |
title_full |
Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul |
title_fullStr |
Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul |
title_full_unstemmed |
Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul |
title_sort |
Proposal of an instrument to verify the adherence between the focus and the practice of Production Planning and Control: a study in the metal-mechanical segment in Serra Gaúcha, Rio Grande do Sul |
author |
Bridi, Cassiano Daniel |
author_facet |
Bridi, Cassiano Daniel Costa, Carlos Alberto dos Reis, Zaida Cristiane |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Carlos Alberto dos Reis, Zaida Cristiane |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bridi, Cassiano Daniel Costa, Carlos Alberto dos Reis, Zaida Cristiane |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Production Planning and Control Techniques Production environment Adherence Focus and Practice of Production Planning and Control. Técnicas de Planejamento e Controle da Produção Ambiente de produção Aderência Foco e Prática do Planejamento Controle da Produção. |
topic |
Production Planning and Control Techniques Production environment Adherence Focus and Practice of Production Planning and Control. Técnicas de Planejamento e Controle da Produção Ambiente de produção Aderência Foco e Prática do Planejamento Controle da Produção. |
description |
Choosing a Production Planning and Control (Planejamento e Controle da Produção – PCP) technique that is aligned with and is appropriate to a company's production environment scenario is considered a crucial factor in its strategy. Such a choice may reflect on how the company manages its timing, inventory, and, consequently, its costs. This study proposes an instrument to evaluate the adherence between the focus and practices of PCP in companies. Six PCP techniques were considered within the scope of work in four production environments: Assemble to Order, Make to Stock, Engineer to Order, and Make to Order. The selected techniques were based on the work of Stevenson, Hendry and Kingsman (2005), and they three classic techniques – Material Requirements Planning, Drum Buffer Rope and Kanban and three emerging – Constant Work in Process, Workload Control and Paired cell Overlapping Loops of Cards with Authorization. Two different perspectives within a company were considered: the one of management and the one of operation, for the analysis, with questions addressing the relations between the techniques and the production environments. The research instrument was developed based on sensitive parameters, to a greater or lesser degree, to the use of each of the techniques in each company. A multiple case study with eight companies from the metalworking segment aligned with the four production environments located in the Serra Gaúcha was carried out. We interviewed managers, who established the focus of the PCP in each company, and PCP and operation specialists, who informed the practices of the production environment. The use of the research instrument was adequate, making it possible to capture the essence of the company's PCP activities. The results show that some techniques have greater compatibility with certain production environments, while others still deserve a finer adjustment. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380 10.20985/1980-5160.2018.v13n3.1380 |
url |
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20985/1980-5160.2018.v13n3.1380 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/html https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/html_1 https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/pdf https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1380/pdf_1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Sistemas & Gestão info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Sistemas & Gestão |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html text/html application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sistemas & Gestão; v. 13 n. 3 (2018): SETEMBRO 2018; 334-344 1980-5160 10.20985/1980-5160.2018.v13n3 reponame:Sistemas & Gestão instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Sistemas & Gestão |
collection |
Sistemas & Gestão |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sistemas & Gestão - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sg.revista@gmail.com|| periodicos@proppi.uff.br |
_version_ |
1798320144521363456 |