Collaboration in construction supply chain in developing countries
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Sistemas & Gestão |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1591 |
Resumo: | Highlights: Supply chain collaboration has been presented in recent decades as a solution to performance issues. However, collaborative supply chains are far from being a reality in the construction industry, especially in emerging countries. Rio de Janeiro, a state of Brazil, was used to investigate CSC (Construction Supply Chain) in an emerging country.Purpose: This article aims to evaluate the characteristics of CSC (Construction Supply Chain) collaboration and identify its critical elements. These elements were also compared in two groups of construction companies: small and medium/large construction companies, in order to verify whether size influences the degree of collaboration.Design / methodology / approach: This study used a combination of two methods: literature review and application of a survey to construction companies in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Data collection was performed from October 2018 to January 2019. The statistical analysis of the elements was performed using the software “R”, by Mann-Whitney U test.Findings: The survey revealed that the elements considered the most important for collaboration were: “joint planning and decision making”, “trust”, and “collaborative culture”. On the other hand, the element considered of minor importance for collaboration was “Information Sharing”. Comparison of the two groups of companies made it possible to conclude that there is a gap between the two groups of builders evaluated, and the medium/large builders were more prone to collaboration. Thus, the article suggests on which points effective collaboration in the CSC should be given attention.Research limitations / implications: This study was limited to researching collaboration in the CSC in construction companies located in the state of Rio de Janeiro.Originality / value: This article contributes to the literature on collaboration at CSC in Brazil and emerging countries, since there are few studies in this area for emerging countries. |
id |
UFF-13_c11a158853702981bbc9ecc3c842fb4c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.revistasg.uff.br:article/1591 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-13 |
network_name_str |
Sistemas & Gestão |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Collaboration in construction supply chain in developing countriesColaboração na cadeia de abastecimento da construção nos países em desenvolvimentoCollaborationConstruction Supply ChainPartnershipConstruction IndustryColaboraçãoCadeia de Fornecimento da Construção CivilParceriaIndústria da Construção.Highlights: Supply chain collaboration has been presented in recent decades as a solution to performance issues. However, collaborative supply chains are far from being a reality in the construction industry, especially in emerging countries. Rio de Janeiro, a state of Brazil, was used to investigate CSC (Construction Supply Chain) in an emerging country.Purpose: This article aims to evaluate the characteristics of CSC (Construction Supply Chain) collaboration and identify its critical elements. These elements were also compared in two groups of construction companies: small and medium/large construction companies, in order to verify whether size influences the degree of collaboration.Design / methodology / approach: This study used a combination of two methods: literature review and application of a survey to construction companies in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Data collection was performed from October 2018 to January 2019. The statistical analysis of the elements was performed using the software “R”, by Mann-Whitney U test.Findings: The survey revealed that the elements considered the most important for collaboration were: “joint planning and decision making”, “trust”, and “collaborative culture”. On the other hand, the element considered of minor importance for collaboration was “Information Sharing”. Comparison of the two groups of companies made it possible to conclude that there is a gap between the two groups of builders evaluated, and the medium/large builders were more prone to collaboration. Thus, the article suggests on which points effective collaboration in the CSC should be given attention.Research limitations / implications: This study was limited to researching collaboration in the CSC in construction companies located in the state of Rio de Janeiro.Originality / value: This article contributes to the literature on collaboration at CSC in Brazil and emerging countries, since there are few studies in this area for emerging countries. Destaques: A colaboração na cadeia de suprimentos tem sido apresentada nas últimas décadas como uma solução para as questões de desempenho. Contudo, as cadeias de abastecimento colaborativas estão longe de ser uma realidade na indústria da construção, especialmente em países emergentes. O Rio de Janeiro, um estado do Brasil, foi usado para investigar a Cadeia de Suprimentos da Construção Civil (Construction Supply Chain – CSC) em um país emergente.Objetivo: Este artigo visa avaliar as características da colaboração CSC e identificar os seus elementos críticos. Estes elementos também foram comparados em dois grupos de empresas de construção: pequenas e médio-grandes empresas de construção, a fim de verificar se o tamanho influencia o grau de colaboração.Projeto / Metodologia / Abordagem: Este estudo utilizou uma combinação de dois métodos: revisão de literatura e aplicação de uma sondagem a empresas construtoras do estado do Rio de Janeiro. A coleta de dados foi realizada de outubro de 2018 a janeiro de 2019. A análise estatística dos elementos foi realizada utilizando o software "R", pelo teste Mann-Whitney U.Resultados: O levantamento revelou que os elementos considerados mais importantes para a colaboração eram: "planejamento e tomada de decisões conjuntas", "confiança" e "cultura colaborativa". Por outro lado, o elemento considerado de menor importância para a colaboração foi o "Compartilhamento de Informações". A comparação dos dois grupos de empresas permitiu concluir que existe uma lacuna entre os dois grupos de construtores avaliados, sendo que os construtores de média/grande dimensão eram mais propensos à colaboração. Assim, o artigo sugere quais os pontos da colaboração efetiva no CSC que devem merecer atenção.Limitações / implicações da pesquisa: This study was limited to researching collaboration in the CSC in construction companies located in the state of Rio de Janeiro.Originalidade / valor: Este artigo contribui para a literatura sobre colaboração na CSC no Brasil e em países emergentes, uma vez que há poucos estudos nesta área para países emergentes. ABEC2020-01-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionEntrevista Controladatext/htmltext/htmlapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/159110.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n2.1591Sistemas & Gestão; v. 14 n. 2 (2019): JUNHO 20191980-516010.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n2reponame:Sistemas & Gestãoinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporenghttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1591/htmlhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1591/html_1https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1591/pdfhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1591/pdf_1Copyright (c) 2019 Sistemas & Gestãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSimões, Carolina Ponte NegraesMello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito2020-05-29T17:16:12Zoai:ojs.www.revistasg.uff.br:article/1591Revistahttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sgPUBhttps://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/oai||sg.revista@gmail.com|| periodicos@proppi.uff.br1980-51601980-5160opendoar:2020-05-29T17:16:12Sistemas & Gestão - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Collaboration in construction supply chain in developing countries Colaboração na cadeia de abastecimento da construção nos países em desenvolvimento |
title |
Collaboration in construction supply chain in developing countries |
spellingShingle |
Collaboration in construction supply chain in developing countries Simões, Carolina Ponte Negraes Collaboration Construction Supply Chain Partnership Construction Industry Colaboração Cadeia de Fornecimento da Construção Civil Parceria Indústria da Construção. |
title_short |
Collaboration in construction supply chain in developing countries |
title_full |
Collaboration in construction supply chain in developing countries |
title_fullStr |
Collaboration in construction supply chain in developing countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Collaboration in construction supply chain in developing countries |
title_sort |
Collaboration in construction supply chain in developing countries |
author |
Simões, Carolina Ponte Negraes |
author_facet |
Simões, Carolina Ponte Negraes Mello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Simões, Carolina Ponte Negraes Mello, Luiz Carlos Brasil de Brito |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Collaboration Construction Supply Chain Partnership Construction Industry Colaboração Cadeia de Fornecimento da Construção Civil Parceria Indústria da Construção. |
topic |
Collaboration Construction Supply Chain Partnership Construction Industry Colaboração Cadeia de Fornecimento da Construção Civil Parceria Indústria da Construção. |
description |
Highlights: Supply chain collaboration has been presented in recent decades as a solution to performance issues. However, collaborative supply chains are far from being a reality in the construction industry, especially in emerging countries. Rio de Janeiro, a state of Brazil, was used to investigate CSC (Construction Supply Chain) in an emerging country.Purpose: This article aims to evaluate the characteristics of CSC (Construction Supply Chain) collaboration and identify its critical elements. These elements were also compared in two groups of construction companies: small and medium/large construction companies, in order to verify whether size influences the degree of collaboration.Design / methodology / approach: This study used a combination of two methods: literature review and application of a survey to construction companies in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Data collection was performed from October 2018 to January 2019. The statistical analysis of the elements was performed using the software “R”, by Mann-Whitney U test.Findings: The survey revealed that the elements considered the most important for collaboration were: “joint planning and decision making”, “trust”, and “collaborative culture”. On the other hand, the element considered of minor importance for collaboration was “Information Sharing”. Comparison of the two groups of companies made it possible to conclude that there is a gap between the two groups of builders evaluated, and the medium/large builders were more prone to collaboration. Thus, the article suggests on which points effective collaboration in the CSC should be given attention.Research limitations / implications: This study was limited to researching collaboration in the CSC in construction companies located in the state of Rio de Janeiro.Originality / value: This article contributes to the literature on collaboration at CSC in Brazil and emerging countries, since there are few studies in this area for emerging countries. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Entrevista Controlada |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1591 10.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n2.1591 |
url |
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1591 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n2.1591 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1591/html https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1591/html_1 https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1591/pdf https://www.revistasg.uff.br/sg/article/view/1591/pdf_1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Sistemas & Gestão info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Sistemas & Gestão |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html text/html application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABEC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sistemas & Gestão; v. 14 n. 2 (2019): JUNHO 2019 1980-5160 10.20985/1980-5160.2019.v14n2 reponame:Sistemas & Gestão instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Sistemas & Gestão |
collection |
Sistemas & Gestão |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sistemas & Gestão - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sg.revista@gmail.com|| periodicos@proppi.uff.br |
_version_ |
1798320145003708416 |