Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Marta Nunes da
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Diversitates
Texto Completo: http://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1/article/view/16
Resumo: ABSTRACT: Democracy has been recognized as the most appealing political and social model, a model that should be promoted and implemented in virtually every country. However, not even such a model is capable of dealing efficiently with realities of discrimination and social exclusion. Under this light, how can one overcome the dichotomy between theory and practice? In this article I will argue that the most effective way to overcome this dichotomy lies in the project of implementing a public ethics. It is an uncontested factor that this project is a challenging and difficult one, regardless of the country that hopes to apply it. On the one hand, because the notion of 'ethics' by itself generally exposes a 'multiple' understanding of its meanings, which are not necessarily conciliable between them. On the other hand, because the reference to a 'public' projects the responsibility of finding a criteria that can accommodate the multiplicity of ethical conceptualizations under a universal umbrella, which the public must recognize as legitimate and valid. For this reason I want to develop a very specific argument, namely, that a (public) ethics should be grounded in a Kantian conceptualization of individual autonomy, which simultaneously represents the conditions of possibility for the success of any democratic project. In order to defend the argument with a sharper intensity and clarity I will take a case study, namely, a country which is going through a democratization process: South Africa.KEYWORDS: democracy, Kant, Apartheid, discrimination, multiculturalism.
id UFF-17_ee18dffce2a35fcd7495225778e2a055
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.uff.br:article/16
network_acronym_str UFF-17
network_name_str Diversitates
repository_id_str
spelling Challenges for a Public Ethics in South AfricaABSTRACT: Democracy has been recognized as the most appealing political and social model, a model that should be promoted and implemented in virtually every country. However, not even such a model is capable of dealing efficiently with realities of discrimination and social exclusion. Under this light, how can one overcome the dichotomy between theory and practice? In this article I will argue that the most effective way to overcome this dichotomy lies in the project of implementing a public ethics. It is an uncontested factor that this project is a challenging and difficult one, regardless of the country that hopes to apply it. On the one hand, because the notion of 'ethics' by itself generally exposes a 'multiple' understanding of its meanings, which are not necessarily conciliable between them. On the other hand, because the reference to a 'public' projects the responsibility of finding a criteria that can accommodate the multiplicity of ethical conceptualizations under a universal umbrella, which the public must recognize as legitimate and valid. For this reason I want to develop a very specific argument, namely, that a (public) ethics should be grounded in a Kantian conceptualization of individual autonomy, which simultaneously represents the conditions of possibility for the success of any democratic project. In order to defend the argument with a sharper intensity and clarity I will take a case study, namely, a country which is going through a democratization process: South Africa.KEYWORDS: democracy, Kant, Apartheid, discrimination, multiculturalism.Universidade Federal FluminenseCosta, Marta Nunes da2016-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1/article/view/16DIVERSITATES International Journal; Diversitates, Vol. 02, N. 1 (Junho-2010)1984-5073reponame:Diversitatesinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttp://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1/article/view/16/14info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-12-14T00:36:25ZRevistahttp://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1PUB
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa
title Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa
spellingShingle Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa
Costa, Marta Nunes da
title_short Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa
title_full Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa
title_fullStr Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa
title_sort Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa
author Costa, Marta Nunes da
author_facet Costa, Marta Nunes da
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Marta Nunes da
description ABSTRACT: Democracy has been recognized as the most appealing political and social model, a model that should be promoted and implemented in virtually every country. However, not even such a model is capable of dealing efficiently with realities of discrimination and social exclusion. Under this light, how can one overcome the dichotomy between theory and practice? In this article I will argue that the most effective way to overcome this dichotomy lies in the project of implementing a public ethics. It is an uncontested factor that this project is a challenging and difficult one, regardless of the country that hopes to apply it. On the one hand, because the notion of 'ethics' by itself generally exposes a 'multiple' understanding of its meanings, which are not necessarily conciliable between them. On the other hand, because the reference to a 'public' projects the responsibility of finding a criteria that can accommodate the multiplicity of ethical conceptualizations under a universal umbrella, which the public must recognize as legitimate and valid. For this reason I want to develop a very specific argument, namely, that a (public) ethics should be grounded in a Kantian conceptualization of individual autonomy, which simultaneously represents the conditions of possibility for the success of any democratic project. In order to defend the argument with a sharper intensity and clarity I will take a case study, namely, a country which is going through a democratization process: South Africa.KEYWORDS: democracy, Kant, Apartheid, discrimination, multiculturalism.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1/article/view/16
url http://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1/article/view/16
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1/article/view/16/14
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv DIVERSITATES International Journal; Diversitates, Vol. 02, N. 1 (Junho-2010)
1984-5073
reponame:Diversitates
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Diversitates
collection Diversitates
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797067670877634560