Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Diversitates |
Texto Completo: | http://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1/article/view/16 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: Democracy has been recognized as the most appealing political and social model, a model that should be promoted and implemented in virtually every country. However, not even such a model is capable of dealing efficiently with realities of discrimination and social exclusion. Under this light, how can one overcome the dichotomy between theory and practice? In this article I will argue that the most effective way to overcome this dichotomy lies in the project of implementing a public ethics. It is an uncontested factor that this project is a challenging and difficult one, regardless of the country that hopes to apply it. On the one hand, because the notion of 'ethics' by itself generally exposes a 'multiple' understanding of its meanings, which are not necessarily conciliable between them. On the other hand, because the reference to a 'public' projects the responsibility of finding a criteria that can accommodate the multiplicity of ethical conceptualizations under a universal umbrella, which the public must recognize as legitimate and valid. For this reason I want to develop a very specific argument, namely, that a (public) ethics should be grounded in a Kantian conceptualization of individual autonomy, which simultaneously represents the conditions of possibility for the success of any democratic project. In order to defend the argument with a sharper intensity and clarity I will take a case study, namely, a country which is going through a democratization process: South Africa.KEYWORDS: democracy, Kant, Apartheid, discrimination, multiculturalism. |
id |
UFF-17_ee18dffce2a35fcd7495225778e2a055 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.uff.br:article/16 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-17 |
network_name_str |
Diversitates |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Challenges for a Public Ethics in South AfricaABSTRACT: Democracy has been recognized as the most appealing political and social model, a model that should be promoted and implemented in virtually every country. However, not even such a model is capable of dealing efficiently with realities of discrimination and social exclusion. Under this light, how can one overcome the dichotomy between theory and practice? In this article I will argue that the most effective way to overcome this dichotomy lies in the project of implementing a public ethics. It is an uncontested factor that this project is a challenging and difficult one, regardless of the country that hopes to apply it. On the one hand, because the notion of 'ethics' by itself generally exposes a 'multiple' understanding of its meanings, which are not necessarily conciliable between them. On the other hand, because the reference to a 'public' projects the responsibility of finding a criteria that can accommodate the multiplicity of ethical conceptualizations under a universal umbrella, which the public must recognize as legitimate and valid. For this reason I want to develop a very specific argument, namely, that a (public) ethics should be grounded in a Kantian conceptualization of individual autonomy, which simultaneously represents the conditions of possibility for the success of any democratic project. In order to defend the argument with a sharper intensity and clarity I will take a case study, namely, a country which is going through a democratization process: South Africa.KEYWORDS: democracy, Kant, Apartheid, discrimination, multiculturalism.Universidade Federal FluminenseCosta, Marta Nunes da2016-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1/article/view/16DIVERSITATES International Journal; Diversitates, Vol. 02, N. 1 (Junho-2010)1984-5073reponame:Diversitatesinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttp://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1/article/view/16/14info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-12-14T00:36:25ZRevistahttp://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1PUB |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa |
title |
Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa |
spellingShingle |
Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa Costa, Marta Nunes da |
title_short |
Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa |
title_full |
Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa |
title_fullStr |
Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa |
title_sort |
Challenges for a Public Ethics in South Africa |
author |
Costa, Marta Nunes da |
author_facet |
Costa, Marta Nunes da |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Marta Nunes da |
description |
ABSTRACT: Democracy has been recognized as the most appealing political and social model, a model that should be promoted and implemented in virtually every country. However, not even such a model is capable of dealing efficiently with realities of discrimination and social exclusion. Under this light, how can one overcome the dichotomy between theory and practice? In this article I will argue that the most effective way to overcome this dichotomy lies in the project of implementing a public ethics. It is an uncontested factor that this project is a challenging and difficult one, regardless of the country that hopes to apply it. On the one hand, because the notion of 'ethics' by itself generally exposes a 'multiple' understanding of its meanings, which are not necessarily conciliable between them. On the other hand, because the reference to a 'public' projects the responsibility of finding a criteria that can accommodate the multiplicity of ethical conceptualizations under a universal umbrella, which the public must recognize as legitimate and valid. For this reason I want to develop a very specific argument, namely, that a (public) ethics should be grounded in a Kantian conceptualization of individual autonomy, which simultaneously represents the conditions of possibility for the success of any democratic project. In order to defend the argument with a sharper intensity and clarity I will take a case study, namely, a country which is going through a democratization process: South Africa.KEYWORDS: democracy, Kant, Apartheid, discrimination, multiculturalism. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1/article/view/16 |
url |
http://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1/article/view/16 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.diversitates.uff.br/index.php/1diversitates-uff1/article/view/16/14 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Fluminense |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
DIVERSITATES International Journal; Diversitates, Vol. 02, N. 1 (Junho-2010) 1984-5073 reponame:Diversitates instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Diversitates |
collection |
Diversitates |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1797067670877634560 |