The philosophical grammar by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (1783)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Confluência |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaconfluencia.org.br/rc/article/view/366 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the linguistic and pedagogical ideas present in the “Grammatica Philosophica da Língua Portugueza” (1783), by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (ca.1736-post.1787), leaving from a critical reading of this Grammar book and an analysis about other researchers who have already studied it. The “Grammatica” is divided into three parts, according to the parts of the grammatical sentence and their functions in the sentence. These parts are subdivided into chapters. The author uses the case nomenclature to describe the terms of the sentences. His intention was to offer to the readers an innovative material, which could present the rules of the Portuguese language by a new methodology. Bacelar believed that a clear, precise and unambiguous communication would only be possible through the knowledge of these rules. As an attentive follower of Port-Royal’s rationalist ideas and of the Enlightenment, he also believed in the existence of an universal grammar. Although he was a great erudite of classical languages and of the Portuguese language, his job was underestimated by the scholars of his time. Unfortunately, he did not achieve his purpose of providing clarity in communication. |
id |
UFF-4_3b72e710797a103105f13e114a7ecb95 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/366 |
network_acronym_str |
UFF-4 |
network_name_str |
Confluência |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The philosophical grammar by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (1783)A gramática filosófica de Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (1783)Portuguese grammarlinguistic enlightenmentpedagogical ideasXVIII centuryrationalism.gramática portuguesailuminismo linguísticoideias pedagógicasséculo XVIIIracionalismo.The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the linguistic and pedagogical ideas present in the “Grammatica Philosophica da Língua Portugueza” (1783), by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (ca.1736-post.1787), leaving from a critical reading of this Grammar book and an analysis about other researchers who have already studied it. The “Grammatica” is divided into three parts, according to the parts of the grammatical sentence and their functions in the sentence. These parts are subdivided into chapters. The author uses the case nomenclature to describe the terms of the sentences. His intention was to offer to the readers an innovative material, which could present the rules of the Portuguese language by a new methodology. Bacelar believed that a clear, precise and unambiguous communication would only be possible through the knowledge of these rules. As an attentive follower of Port-Royal’s rationalist ideas and of the Enlightenment, he also believed in the existence of an universal grammar. Although he was a great erudite of classical languages and of the Portuguese language, his job was underestimated by the scholars of his time. Unfortunately, he did not achieve his purpose of providing clarity in communication.A proposta deste artigo é demonstrar as ideias linguísticas e pedagógicas presentes na "Grammatica Philosophica da Língua Portugueza" (1783), de Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (ca.1736-post.1787), a partir de uma leitura crítica desta obra e da análise de outros estudiosos que já se empenharam em estudá-la. A "Grammatica" é dividida em três partes, de acordo com as partes da oração, conforme suas funções na frase. Estas partes são subdivididas em capítulos. O autor utiliza a nomenclatura casual para descrever os termos da oração. Sua preocupação ao compor a gramática era oferecer aos leitores um material inédito que pudesse apresentar de maneira inovadora as leis que regem a língua portuguesa, pois acreditava que uma comunicação clara, precisa e sem erros somente seria possível através do conhecimento dessas leis. Atento seguidor das ideias racionalistas de "Port-Royal" e do movimento iluminista, acreditava também na existência de uma gramática universal. Embora tenha sido um grande erudito das línguas clássicas e da língua materna, teve sua obra menosprezada pelos estudiosos de sua época, não atingindo, portanto, seus ideais de proporcionar clareza na comunicação.Liceu Literário Português2020-08-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistaconfluencia.org.br/rc/article/view/36610.18364/rc.v0i0.366Confluência; 2020: Issue 59; 166-176Confluência; 2020: Número 59; 166-176Confluência; 2020: Número 59; 166-176Confluência; 2020: Número 59; 166-176Confluência; 2020: Número 59; 166-1762317-41531415-740310.18364/rc.v1i59reponame:Confluênciainstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://revistaconfluencia.org.br/rc/article/view/366/239Copyright (c) 2021 Lívia de Meloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Melo, Lívia2022-02-13T03:40:37Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/366Revistahttps://revistaconfluencia.org.br/rcPUBhttps://revistaconfluencia.org.br/rc/oairevistaconfluencias.psd@id.uff.br||2318-45581678-7145opendoar:2022-02-13T03:40:37Confluência - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The philosophical grammar by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (1783) A gramática filosófica de Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (1783) |
title |
The philosophical grammar by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (1783) |
spellingShingle |
The philosophical grammar by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (1783) de Melo, Lívia Portuguese grammar linguistic enlightenment pedagogical ideas XVIII century rationalism. gramática portuguesa iluminismo linguístico ideias pedagógicas século XVIII racionalismo. |
title_short |
The philosophical grammar by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (1783) |
title_full |
The philosophical grammar by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (1783) |
title_fullStr |
The philosophical grammar by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (1783) |
title_full_unstemmed |
The philosophical grammar by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (1783) |
title_sort |
The philosophical grammar by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (1783) |
author |
de Melo, Lívia |
author_facet |
de Melo, Lívia |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Melo, Lívia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Portuguese grammar linguistic enlightenment pedagogical ideas XVIII century rationalism. gramática portuguesa iluminismo linguístico ideias pedagógicas século XVIII racionalismo. |
topic |
Portuguese grammar linguistic enlightenment pedagogical ideas XVIII century rationalism. gramática portuguesa iluminismo linguístico ideias pedagógicas século XVIII racionalismo. |
description |
The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the linguistic and pedagogical ideas present in the “Grammatica Philosophica da Língua Portugueza” (1783), by Bernardo de Lima e Melo Bacelar (ca.1736-post.1787), leaving from a critical reading of this Grammar book and an analysis about other researchers who have already studied it. The “Grammatica” is divided into three parts, according to the parts of the grammatical sentence and their functions in the sentence. These parts are subdivided into chapters. The author uses the case nomenclature to describe the terms of the sentences. His intention was to offer to the readers an innovative material, which could present the rules of the Portuguese language by a new methodology. Bacelar believed that a clear, precise and unambiguous communication would only be possible through the knowledge of these rules. As an attentive follower of Port-Royal’s rationalist ideas and of the Enlightenment, he also believed in the existence of an universal grammar. Although he was a great erudite of classical languages and of the Portuguese language, his job was underestimated by the scholars of his time. Unfortunately, he did not achieve his purpose of providing clarity in communication. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaconfluencia.org.br/rc/article/view/366 10.18364/rc.v0i0.366 |
url |
https://revistaconfluencia.org.br/rc/article/view/366 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18364/rc.v0i0.366 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaconfluencia.org.br/rc/article/view/366/239 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Lívia de Melo info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Lívia de Melo |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Liceu Literário Português |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Liceu Literário Português |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Confluência; 2020: Issue 59; 166-176 Confluência; 2020: Número 59; 166-176 Confluência; 2020: Número 59; 166-176 Confluência; 2020: Número 59; 166-176 Confluência; 2020: Número 59; 166-176 2317-4153 1415-7403 10.18364/rc.v1i59 reponame:Confluência instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) instacron:UFF |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
instacron_str |
UFF |
institution |
UFF |
reponame_str |
Confluência |
collection |
Confluência |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Confluência - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistaconfluencias.psd@id.uff.br|| |
_version_ |
1799705458853806080 |