The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocha, Luiz Fernando Matos
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Dias, Ana Carolina Neves, Vieira, Karina Carolina, Silva, Joice Carla Ribeiro da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Gragoatá
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/36586
Resumo: This paper investigates semantic-pragmatic distinctions in the "acredita isso/acredita nisso" pair of grammatical constructions in Portuguese, fostered by their syntactic differences and licensed by specific discursive contexts. Given the Cognitive Linguistcs’ theoretical framework, represented here by authors such as Almeida (2010), Croft and Cruse (2004), Ferrari (2011), Goldberg (1995, 2006), Langacker (1999, 2007), Pascual (2014), and Talmy (2000), it postulates that the uses of "acredita isso", common to local counter-expectation contexts, involve a more subjective perspective about the scene evoked, and thus, by triggering the frame of perplexity or admiration, the speaker invokes this to himself rather than the addressee reaction; "acredita nisso", common to experienced counter-expectations and local counterposition contexts, encompasses a more objective perspective on the evoked scene, and by triggering the belief frame, the speaker evokes it for the other. The antecedent term anaphorically taken up by the pronoun “isso” shapes the addressee's conception, in a disjunctive perspective; whereas the antecedent term anaphorically taken up by the pronoun “nisso” shapes the speaker's own conception, in a conjunctive perspective. If the verb "acreditar" falls within the scope of negation, the pronoun “isso” shapes the speaker's own conception, and the pronoun “nisso” shapes the addressee's conception. The hypotheses were raised from data extracted from websites in Portuguese on the internet.
id UFF-6_031eb89ce9c20c2781640a9ff59b3281
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36586
network_acronym_str UFF-6
network_name_str Gragoatá
repository_id_str
spelling The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic differenceO par construcional “acredita nisso/acredita isso”: distinção sintática no uso implica diferença semântico-pragmáticaConstruction Grammar. Fictivity. Subjectivity. Intersubjectivity. Use.Gramática das Construções. Fictividade. Subjetividade. Intersubjetividade. Uso.This paper investigates semantic-pragmatic distinctions in the "acredita isso/acredita nisso" pair of grammatical constructions in Portuguese, fostered by their syntactic differences and licensed by specific discursive contexts. Given the Cognitive Linguistcs’ theoretical framework, represented here by authors such as Almeida (2010), Croft and Cruse (2004), Ferrari (2011), Goldberg (1995, 2006), Langacker (1999, 2007), Pascual (2014), and Talmy (2000), it postulates that the uses of "acredita isso", common to local counter-expectation contexts, involve a more subjective perspective about the scene evoked, and thus, by triggering the frame of perplexity or admiration, the speaker invokes this to himself rather than the addressee reaction; "acredita nisso", common to experienced counter-expectations and local counterposition contexts, encompasses a more objective perspective on the evoked scene, and by triggering the belief frame, the speaker evokes it for the other. The antecedent term anaphorically taken up by the pronoun “isso” shapes the addressee's conception, in a disjunctive perspective; whereas the antecedent term anaphorically taken up by the pronoun “nisso” shapes the speaker's own conception, in a conjunctive perspective. If the verb "acreditar" falls within the scope of negation, the pronoun “isso” shapes the speaker's own conception, and the pronoun “nisso” shapes the addressee's conception. The hypotheses were raised from data extracted from websites in Portuguese on the internet.Este trabalho investiga, no par de construções gramaticais “acredita nisso/acredita isso”, distinções semântico-pragmáticas suscitadas por diferenças sintáticas e licenciadas por contextos discursivos específicos. Tendo em vista o arcabouço teórico da Linguística Cognitiva, representado aqui por autores como Almeida (2010), Croft e Cruse (2004), Ferrari (2011), Goldberg (1995, 2006), Langacker (1999, 2007), Pascual (2014) e Talmy (2000), postula-se que os usos de “acredita nisso”, comuns a contextos de contraexpectativa reiterada e contraposição local, abarcam uma perspectiva mais objetiva sobre a cena evocada, sendo que, ao acionar o frame de crença, o enunciador evoca-o para o outro; já os de “acredita isso”, comuns a contextos de contraexpectativa local, envolvem uma perspectiva mais subjetiva do enunciador sobre a cena evocada, sendo que, ao acionar o frame de perplexidade, o enunciador invoca-o para si em detrimento da reação do interlocutor. O termo antecedente anaforicamente retomado pelo pronome “nisso” perfila a concepção própria do enunciador, em perspectiva conjuntiva; ao passo que o termo antecedente anaforicamente retomado pelo pronome “isso” perfila a concepção do interlocutor, em perspectiva disjuntiva. Se o verbo “acreditar” estiver sob o escopo da negação, dá-se o oposto: “nisso” perfila a concepção do interlocutor; “isso” perfila a concepção própria do enunciador. As hipóteses foram levantadas com base em dados extraídos de sites em português na internet.Universidade Federal Fluminense2020-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/3658610.22409/gragoata.v25i52.36586Gragoatá; Vol. 25 No. 52 (2020): Grammar of constructions and interfaces; 809-833Gragoatá; v. 25 n. 52 (2020): Gramática de Construções e interfaces; 809-8332358-41141413-907310.22409/gragoata.v25i52reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/36586/26458Copyright (c) 2020 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRocha, Luiz Fernando MatosDias, Ana Carolina NevesVieira, Karina CarolinaSilva, Joice Carla Ribeiro da2020-09-21T09:06:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36586Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2020-09-21T09:06:32Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference
O par construcional “acredita nisso/acredita isso”: distinção sintática no uso implica diferença semântico-pragmática
title The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference
spellingShingle The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference
Rocha, Luiz Fernando Matos
Construction Grammar. Fictivity. Subjectivity. Intersubjectivity. Use.
Gramática das Construções. Fictividade. Subjetividade. Intersubjetividade. Uso.
title_short The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference
title_full The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference
title_fullStr The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference
title_full_unstemmed The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference
title_sort The constructional pair "acredita nisso/acredita isso": syntactic distinction in use implies semantic-pragmatic difference
author Rocha, Luiz Fernando Matos
author_facet Rocha, Luiz Fernando Matos
Dias, Ana Carolina Neves
Vieira, Karina Carolina
Silva, Joice Carla Ribeiro da
author_role author
author2 Dias, Ana Carolina Neves
Vieira, Karina Carolina
Silva, Joice Carla Ribeiro da
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocha, Luiz Fernando Matos
Dias, Ana Carolina Neves
Vieira, Karina Carolina
Silva, Joice Carla Ribeiro da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Construction Grammar. Fictivity. Subjectivity. Intersubjectivity. Use.
Gramática das Construções. Fictividade. Subjetividade. Intersubjetividade. Uso.
topic Construction Grammar. Fictivity. Subjectivity. Intersubjectivity. Use.
Gramática das Construções. Fictividade. Subjetividade. Intersubjetividade. Uso.
description This paper investigates semantic-pragmatic distinctions in the "acredita isso/acredita nisso" pair of grammatical constructions in Portuguese, fostered by their syntactic differences and licensed by specific discursive contexts. Given the Cognitive Linguistcs’ theoretical framework, represented here by authors such as Almeida (2010), Croft and Cruse (2004), Ferrari (2011), Goldberg (1995, 2006), Langacker (1999, 2007), Pascual (2014), and Talmy (2000), it postulates that the uses of "acredita isso", common to local counter-expectation contexts, involve a more subjective perspective about the scene evoked, and thus, by triggering the frame of perplexity or admiration, the speaker invokes this to himself rather than the addressee reaction; "acredita nisso", common to experienced counter-expectations and local counterposition contexts, encompasses a more objective perspective on the evoked scene, and by triggering the belief frame, the speaker evokes it for the other. The antecedent term anaphorically taken up by the pronoun “isso” shapes the addressee's conception, in a disjunctive perspective; whereas the antecedent term anaphorically taken up by the pronoun “nisso” shapes the speaker's own conception, in a conjunctive perspective. If the verb "acreditar" falls within the scope of negation, the pronoun “isso” shapes the speaker's own conception, and the pronoun “nisso” shapes the addressee's conception. The hypotheses were raised from data extracted from websites in Portuguese on the internet.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/36586
10.22409/gragoata.v25i52.36586
url https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/36586
identifier_str_mv 10.22409/gragoata.v25i52.36586
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/36586/26458
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Gragoatá
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Gragoatá
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Gragoatá; Vol. 25 No. 52 (2020): Grammar of constructions and interfaces; 809-833
Gragoatá; v. 25 n. 52 (2020): Gramática de Construções e interfaces; 809-833
2358-4114
1413-9073
10.22409/gragoata.v25i52
reponame:Gragoatá
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Gragoatá
collection Gragoatá
repository.name.fl_str_mv Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistagragoata@gmail.com
_version_ 1799705502837374976