Visions of death in the indigenous novels in Darcy Ribeiro and Jorge Icaza

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques, Paulo Sérgio
Data de Publicação: 2007
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Gragoatá
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33198
Resumo: One objective of this comparative study between two scenes of death in the indigenous novels Maí­ra, by Brazilian Darcy Ribeiro, and Huasipungo, by Ecuadorian Jorge Icaza, is to disclose differing notions of death: the white European culture’s and the American native’s. Another objective is to show the way they expresses a peculiar weltans­chuung to each culture: the Christian and pagan, and the settlers and settled. The settlers’ views about death in Icaza’s Huasipungo perform as objects of separation and hierarchy, while the nati­ves’ views in Ribeiro’s Maíra appear as processes of communion and participation. Comparisons between each conception make use of anthropo­logical and archetypal criticism methodologies from the theories of Humberto Maturana, Gilbert Durand, and Joseph Campbell, among others.
id UFF-6_a571f1a3f0a7535dbc0e5785cd1c1386
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33198
network_acronym_str UFF-6
network_name_str Gragoatá
repository_id_str
spelling Visions of death in the indigenous novels in Darcy Ribeiro and Jorge IcazaVisões da morte no indigenismo de Darcy Ribeiro e Jorge IcazaBrazilian LiteratureHispanic-American Literatureindigenousmyth and narrativeLiteratura brasileiraLitera¬tura hispano-AmericanaIndigenismoMito e NarrativaOne objective of this comparative study between two scenes of death in the indigenous novels Maí­ra, by Brazilian Darcy Ribeiro, and Huasipungo, by Ecuadorian Jorge Icaza, is to disclose differing notions of death: the white European culture’s and the American native’s. Another objective is to show the way they expresses a peculiar weltans­chuung to each culture: the Christian and pagan, and the settlers and settled. The settlers’ views about death in Icaza’s Huasipungo perform as objects of separation and hierarchy, while the nati­ves’ views in Ribeiro’s Maíra appear as processes of communion and participation. Comparisons between each conception make use of anthropo­logical and archetypal criticism methodologies from the theories of Humberto Maturana, Gilbert Durand, and Joseph Campbell, among others.O objetivo deste estudo comparativo entre duas cenas de morte presentes em Maíra, do brasileiro Darcy Ribeiro, e Huasipungo, do equatoriano Jorge Icaza, é mostrar as diferentes concepções da morte, da cultura branca européia e do indígena americano, apresentadas nos dois romances indi­genistas, e como elas expressam uma cosmovisão peculiar a cada uma dessas culturas, a cristã e a pagã, a colonizadora e a colonizada. Enquanto em Jorge Icaza a morte descrita pelo olhar do coloniza­dor serve de objeto de hierarquização e separação, a morte pelo olhar indígena de Maíra revela-se como um processo de comunhão e participação. Utilizamos, para a comparação, elementos da crítica arquetípica e antropológica, a partir das teorias de Humberto Maturana, Gilbert Durand e Joseph Campbell, dentre outras.Universidade Federal Fluminense2007-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33198Gragoatá; Vol. 12 No. 22 (2007): Latin-American relations: language and literatureGragoatá; v. 12 n. 22 (2007): Relações latino-americanas: língua e literatura2358-41141413-9073reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33198/19185Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques, Paulo Sérgio2020-08-18T23:31:06Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33198Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2020-08-18T23:31:06Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Visions of death in the indigenous novels in Darcy Ribeiro and Jorge Icaza
Visões da morte no indigenismo de Darcy Ribeiro e Jorge Icaza
title Visions of death in the indigenous novels in Darcy Ribeiro and Jorge Icaza
spellingShingle Visions of death in the indigenous novels in Darcy Ribeiro and Jorge Icaza
Marques, Paulo Sérgio
Brazilian Literature
Hispanic-American Literature
indigenous
myth and narrative
Literatura brasileira
Litera¬tura hispano-Americana
Indigenismo
Mito e Narrativa
title_short Visions of death in the indigenous novels in Darcy Ribeiro and Jorge Icaza
title_full Visions of death in the indigenous novels in Darcy Ribeiro and Jorge Icaza
title_fullStr Visions of death in the indigenous novels in Darcy Ribeiro and Jorge Icaza
title_full_unstemmed Visions of death in the indigenous novels in Darcy Ribeiro and Jorge Icaza
title_sort Visions of death in the indigenous novels in Darcy Ribeiro and Jorge Icaza
author Marques, Paulo Sérgio
author_facet Marques, Paulo Sérgio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques, Paulo Sérgio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Brazilian Literature
Hispanic-American Literature
indigenous
myth and narrative
Literatura brasileira
Litera¬tura hispano-Americana
Indigenismo
Mito e Narrativa
topic Brazilian Literature
Hispanic-American Literature
indigenous
myth and narrative
Literatura brasileira
Litera¬tura hispano-Americana
Indigenismo
Mito e Narrativa
description One objective of this comparative study between two scenes of death in the indigenous novels Maí­ra, by Brazilian Darcy Ribeiro, and Huasipungo, by Ecuadorian Jorge Icaza, is to disclose differing notions of death: the white European culture’s and the American native’s. Another objective is to show the way they expresses a peculiar weltans­chuung to each culture: the Christian and pagan, and the settlers and settled. The settlers’ views about death in Icaza’s Huasipungo perform as objects of separation and hierarchy, while the nati­ves’ views in Ribeiro’s Maíra appear as processes of communion and participation. Comparisons between each conception make use of anthropo­logical and archetypal criticism methodologies from the theories of Humberto Maturana, Gilbert Durand, and Joseph Campbell, among others.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33198
url https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33198
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33198/19185
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Gragoatá; Vol. 12 No. 22 (2007): Latin-American relations: language and literature
Gragoatá; v. 12 n. 22 (2007): Relações latino-americanas: língua e literatura
2358-4114
1413-9073
reponame:Gragoatá
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Gragoatá
collection Gragoatá
repository.name.fl_str_mv Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistagragoata@gmail.com
_version_ 1799705500633268224