Theories of text and discourse: incompatible?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Possenti, Sírio
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Gragoatá
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33071
Resumo: This work believes that there is hardly any debates or controversy in the Brazilian academy, at least in the area of language studies. After reflecting about the theory of Dascal, which discusses the relevance of the controversies, the distinction between studies of text and studies of discourse is analyzed, since the term “discourse” is often related to both of them. It is presented the fundamental differences on certain issues (subject, reading, multisemiosis) and it is emphasized the different conceptions about a current subject in Brazil: the reference. The thesis is that the solutions from discourse analysis and from the study of text are incompatible and that issues like this should be explicitly discussed, as if to “discover” the best solution.
id UFF-6_a768e660ca6e8d628f6236cf224dead8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33071
network_acronym_str UFF-6
network_name_str Gragoatá
repository_id_str
spelling Theories of text and discourse: incompatible?Teorias de texto e de discurso: inconciliáveis?controversydiscoursetextreferencecontrovérsiadiscursotextoreferenciaçãoThis work believes that there is hardly any debates or controversy in the Brazilian academy, at least in the area of language studies. After reflecting about the theory of Dascal, which discusses the relevance of the controversies, the distinction between studies of text and studies of discourse is analyzed, since the term “discourse” is often related to both of them. It is presented the fundamental differences on certain issues (subject, reading, multisemiosis) and it is emphasized the different conceptions about a current subject in Brazil: the reference. The thesis is that the solutions from discourse analysis and from the study of text are incompatible and that issues like this should be explicitly discussed, as if to “discover” the best solution.O trabalho parte da constatação de que não há, praticamente, debates ou polêmicas na academia brasileira, pelo menos na área de estudos da linguagem. Depois de expor a tese de Dascal sobre a relevância das controvérsias, concentra-se na distinção entre os estudos de texto e de discurso, que eventualmente são aproximados, pelo menos pela ocorrência de certos termos, especialmente “discurso”. Apresenta as diferenças fundamentais em relação a determinadas questões (sujeito, leitura, multissemiose) e concentra-se nas diferentes concepções sobre um tema que os estudos de texto tornaram corrente no Brasil, a referenciação. A tese é que as soluções da análise do discurso e dos estudos de texto são incompatíveis e que temas como este deveriam ser explicitamente debatidos, como se se tratasse de “descobrir” efetivamente a melhor solução.Universidade Federal Fluminense2010-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/3307110.22409/gragoata.v15i29.33071Gragoatá; Vol. 15 No. 29 (2010): Methodological approachesGragoatá; v. 15 n. 29 (2010): Abordagens metodológicas2358-41141413-907310.22409/gragoata.v15i29reponame:Gragoatáinstname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)instacron:UFFporhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33071/19058Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatáinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPossenti, Sírio2019-08-23T10:58:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33071Revistahttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoataPUBhttps://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/oai||revistagragoata@gmail.com2358-41141413-9073opendoar:2019-08-23T10:58:49Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Theories of text and discourse: incompatible?
Teorias de texto e de discurso: inconciliáveis?
title Theories of text and discourse: incompatible?
spellingShingle Theories of text and discourse: incompatible?
Possenti, Sírio
controversy
discourse
text
reference
controvérsia
discurso
texto
referenciação
title_short Theories of text and discourse: incompatible?
title_full Theories of text and discourse: incompatible?
title_fullStr Theories of text and discourse: incompatible?
title_full_unstemmed Theories of text and discourse: incompatible?
title_sort Theories of text and discourse: incompatible?
author Possenti, Sírio
author_facet Possenti, Sírio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Possenti, Sírio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv controversy
discourse
text
reference
controvérsia
discurso
texto
referenciação
topic controversy
discourse
text
reference
controvérsia
discurso
texto
referenciação
description This work believes that there is hardly any debates or controversy in the Brazilian academy, at least in the area of language studies. After reflecting about the theory of Dascal, which discusses the relevance of the controversies, the distinction between studies of text and studies of discourse is analyzed, since the term “discourse” is often related to both of them. It is presented the fundamental differences on certain issues (subject, reading, multisemiosis) and it is emphasized the different conceptions about a current subject in Brazil: the reference. The thesis is that the solutions from discourse analysis and from the study of text are incompatible and that issues like this should be explicitly discussed, as if to “discover” the best solution.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33071
10.22409/gragoata.v15i29.33071
url https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33071
identifier_str_mv 10.22409/gragoata.v15i29.33071
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uff.br/gragoata/article/view/33071/19058
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Gragoatá
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Fluminense
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Gragoatá; Vol. 15 No. 29 (2010): Methodological approaches
Gragoatá; v. 15 n. 29 (2010): Abordagens metodológicas
2358-4114
1413-9073
10.22409/gragoata.v15i29
reponame:Gragoatá
instname:Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron:UFF
instname_str Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
instacron_str UFF
institution UFF
reponame_str Gragoatá
collection Gragoatá
repository.name.fl_str_mv Gragoatá - Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistagragoata@gmail.com
_version_ 1799705500207546368

Registros relacionados